• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科生的良好实践和学习策略。

Good Practices and Learning Strategies of Undergraduate University Students.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Teacher Training College, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 12;17(6):1849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061849.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17061849
PMID:32178395
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7143265/
Abstract

The educational models currently in use in higher education aim to make students active participants in their learning process, while the lecturer is seen more as a facilitator of the said process. Students' learning strategies (superficial approach-memorizing, deep approach-looking for meaning, and achievement approach-aimed at results) and their good practices are gaining in importance and the aim of this study is to identify university students' good practices, which are related to their learning strategies. To do so, our research covered 610 students from different science degree courses at the University of Extremadura who anonymously completed the University Students' Good Practice Inventory (IBPEU and the University students' Questionnaire to Evaluate Study and Learning Processes (CEPEA). The influence of context, understood here as the center or scientific field, was discarded. The factor 'Actively learning' was positively associated with the deep and achievement approaches; the factor 'Interaction with lecturers' was positively associated with the superficial approach and negatively with the deep approach; the factor 'Cooperative work' was also associated with the deep approach; while the achievement approach was positively associated with the factor 'Optimizing time' and negatively with 'respect for different capacities'. These associations are promising as good practices can be learnt and evaluated.

摘要

目前在高等教育中使用的教育模式旨在使学生成为学习过程的积极参与者,而讲师则更多地被视为该过程的促进者。学生的学习策略(浅层学习策略——死记硬背、深层学习策略——寻找意义、成就学习策略——追求结果)及其良好实践越来越受到重视,本研究旨在确定与学生学习策略相关的大学生良好实践。为此,我们的研究涵盖了来自埃斯特雷马杜拉大学不同科学学位课程的 610 名学生,他们匿名填写了大学生良好实践清单(IBPEU)和大学生评估学习和学习过程问卷(CEPEA)。这里的上下文被理解为中心或科学领域的影响被排除在外。“主动学习”因素与深层和成就学习策略呈正相关;“与讲师互动”因素与浅层学习策略呈正相关,与深层学习策略呈负相关;“合作工作”因素也与深层学习策略相关;而成就学习策略与“优化时间”因素呈正相关,与“尊重不同能力”因素呈负相关。这些关联很有希望,因为良好的实践可以被学习和评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d37f/7143265/662fd14903d2/ijerph-17-01849-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d37f/7143265/dafb7f49b085/ijerph-17-01849-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d37f/7143265/662fd14903d2/ijerph-17-01849-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d37f/7143265/dafb7f49b085/ijerph-17-01849-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d37f/7143265/662fd14903d2/ijerph-17-01849-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Good Practices and Learning Strategies of Undergraduate University Students.本科生的良好实践和学习策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 12;17(6):1849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061849.
2
Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement.诱发先前学习经验和学习方法作为学业成绩的预测指标。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Sep;83(Pt 3):363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02066.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
3
Lecturers' reflection on the three-part assessment discussions with students and preceptors during clinical practice education: A repeated group discussion study.教师对临床实践教育中与学生和导师进行三部分评估讨论的反思:一项重复的小组讨论研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Mar;36:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
Teaching neuroanatomy using computer-aided learning: What makes for successful outcomes?运用计算机辅助学习教授神经解剖学:哪些因素决定了成功的结果?
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):560-569. doi: 10.1002/ase.1694. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Which lecturers' characteristics facilitate the learning process? A qualitative study on students' perceptions in the rehabilitation sciences.哪些讲师的特点有助于学习过程?康复科学领域学生感知的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04308-y.
6
Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context.在职前教师教育背景下开发深度学习方法和个人教学效能。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Dec;72(Pt 4):483-511. doi: 10.1348/00070990260377488.
7
University students dataset related to achievement, classroom practices, perceptions and attitudes of multimedia-based learning quantum physics.与基于多媒体的量子物理学习的成绩、课堂实践、认知和态度相关的大学生数据集。
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 12;12:4. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.128013.2. eCollection 2023.
8
Students' general learning approaches and performances in medical school: a longitudinal study.医学院学生的一般学习方法与学业表现:一项纵向研究。
Acad Med. 1995 Aug;70(8):715-22. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199508000-00016.
9
Dental Students' Educational Achievement in Relation to Their Learning Styles: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran.牙科学生的教育成就与其学习风格的关系:伊朗的一项横断面研究。
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):152-8. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p152.
10
Observations of veterinary medicine students' approaches to study in pre-clinical years.对兽医学专业学生临床前几年学习方法的观察。
J Vet Med Educ. 2004 Fall;31(3):242-54. doi: 10.3138/jvme.31.3.242.

引用本文的文献

1
Satisfaction with Self and External Regulation of Learning in Higher Education Students in Brazil.巴西高等教育学生的自我满意度与学习的外部调节
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115914.
2
Gender and Socioeconomic Status as Factors of Individual Differences in Pre-University Students' Decision-Making for Careers, with a Focus on Family Influence and Psychosocial Factors.性别和社会经济地位是影响大学生职业决策的个体差异因素,重点关注家庭影响和心理社会因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031344.
3
Sex and Careers of University Students in Educational Practices as Factors of Individual Differences in Learning Environment and Psychological Factors during COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
University Student's Academic Goals When Working in Teams: Questionnaire on Academic Goals in Teamwork, 3 × 2 Model.大学生团队合作中的学术目标:团队合作中学术目标问卷,3×2模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02434. eCollection 2019.
2
Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument for Attitudes towards Teamwork.团队合作态度测量工具的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 20;8:1009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01009. eCollection 2017.
3
Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education.
新冠疫情期间,教育实践中大学生的性别和职业与学习环境和心理因素的个体差异有关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14):5036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145036.
英国高等教育中的学习观念、学习方法与个人发展
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Jun;79(Pt 2):295-309. doi: 10.1348/000709908X368866. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
4
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.修订后的双因素学习过程问卷:R-SPQ-2F。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Mar;71(Pt 1):133-49. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433.
5
What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification.学生学习过程的评估清单究竟衡量的是什么?一项理论综述与阐释。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1993 Feb;63 ( Pt 1):3-19. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x.