Suppr超能文献

推拿治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

Efficacy of Tuina in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.

Institute of Tuina, Shanghai Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4198-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is a common reason for medical care and carries a heavy social burden. The efficacy of Tuina or health care education for low back pain has been evaluated in previous systematic reviews. However, there is no evidence to support the superiority of one form of treatment over another. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Tuina with health care education in the management of low back pain.

METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a randomized controlled trial with parallel-group design including two groups: a Tuina group and a health care education group. A total of 160 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to the groups in a 1:1 ratio. The interventions of both groups will last for 20 min and be carried out twice each week for a period of 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index. The secondary outcomes include a visual analogue scale and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. They will be assessed at baseline, at the end of the intervention every month, and during 6 months and 9 months of follow-up by repeated measures analysis of variance. The significance level is 5%. The safety of Tuina and health care education will be evaluated after each treatment session. This study will focus on the value of Tuina and health care education for low back pain and will highlight any differences in the efficacy of the treatments.

DISCUSSION

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tuina intervention for low back pain, which could provide reliable evidence for clinical decision making for patients with low back pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900022656. Registered on 23 April 2019.

摘要

背景

腰痛是医疗保健的常见原因,且社会负担沉重。既往系统评价已评估推拿或健康教育治疗腰痛的疗效,但尚无证据支持一种治疗方法优于另一种。本研究旨在比较推拿与健康教育在腰痛管理中的疗效。

方法/设计:这是一项平行组设计的随机对照试验,包括两组:推拿组和健康教育组。共纳入 160 名符合条件的参与者,按 1:1 的比例随机分配到两组。两组的干预措施均持续 20 分钟,每周进行两次,共 12 周。主要结局指标为 Oswestry 残疾指数。次要结局指标包括视觉模拟评分和 36 项简明健康状况调查问卷。通过重复测量方差分析,在基线、干预结束时每月以及随访 6 个月和 9 个月时进行评估。显著性水平为 5%。每次治疗后将评估推拿和健康教育的安全性。本研究将重点关注推拿和健康教育对腰痛的价值,并突出治疗效果的任何差异。

讨论

本研究将评估推拿干预腰痛的疗效和安全性,可为腰痛患者的临床决策提供可靠证据。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR1900022656。于 2019 年 4 月 23 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9c1/7077020/306c86809e33/13063_2020_4198_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验