• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即刻种植体乳房重建术后种植体丢失的经历:定性研究

Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: qualitative study.

作者信息

Mahoney B, Walklet E, Bradley E, Thrush S, Skillman J, Whisker L, Barnes N, Holcombe C, Potter S

机构信息

School of Psychology, College of Business, Psychology and Sport, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.

College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):380-390. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50275. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50275
PMID:32181587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7260419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' quality of life. The first phase of the Loss of implant Breast Reconstruction (LiBRA) study aimed to use qualitative methods to explore women's experiences of implant loss and develop recommendations to improve care.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who experienced implant loss after immediate IBBR, performed for malignancy or risk reduction across six centres. Interviews explored decision-making regarding IBBR, and experiences of implant loss and support received. Thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative interview data. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women were interviewed; 19 had surgery for malignancy and five for risk reduction. The median time between implant loss and interview was 42 (range 22-74) months. Ten women had undergone secondary reconstruction, two were awaiting surgery, and 12 had declined further reconstruction. Three key themes were identified: the need for accurate information about the risks and benefits of IBBR; the need for more information about 'early-warning' signs of postoperative problems, to empower women to seek help; and better support following implant loss.

CONCLUSION

Implant loss is a devastating event for many women. Better preoperative information and support, along with holistic patient-centred care when complications occur, may significantly improve the experience and outcome of care.

摘要

背景

即刻乳房植入重建术(IBBR)是英国最常用的重建手术,但近十分之一的女性在接受该技术后会出现植入物丢失和重建失败的情况。对于植入物丢失如何影响患者的生活质量,人们知之甚少。乳房重建植入物丢失(LiBRA)研究的第一阶段旨在运用定性方法,探究女性植入物丢失的经历,并提出改善护理的建议。

方法

对在六个中心因恶性肿瘤或降低风险而接受即刻IBBR术后出现植入物丢失的女性进行了有目的抽样的半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了关于IBBR的决策、植入物丢失的经历以及获得的支持。采用主题分析法对定性访谈数据进行探究。抽样、数据收集和分析同时且反复进行,直至达到数据饱和。

结果

共访谈了24名女性;其中19名因恶性肿瘤接受手术,5名因降低风险接受手术。植入物丢失至访谈的中位时间为42(范围22 - 74)个月。10名女性接受了二次重建,2名等待手术,12名拒绝进一步重建。确定了三个关键主题:需要获得关于IBBR风险和益处的准确信息;需要更多关于术后问题“预警”迹象的信息,以使女性有能力寻求帮助;以及在植入物丢失后获得更好的支持。

结论

植入物丢失对许多女性来说是一个毁灭性事件。更好的术前信息和支持,以及并发症发生时以患者为中心的整体护理,可能会显著改善护理体验和结果。

相似文献

1
Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: qualitative study.即刻种植体乳房重建术后种植体丢失的经历:定性研究
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):380-390. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50275. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
2
Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.直接植入式乳房重建:更高的并发症发生率与美容获益。
Breast J. 2018 Nov;24(6):957-964. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13113. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
3
Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.使用全国真实世界数据对比即刻直接植入式与两阶段植入式乳房重建术后的翻修发生率
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):693-702. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009979. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.基于假体的两阶段乳房重建与即刻一期基于假体的乳房重建联合脱细胞真皮基质的比较:一项开放标签、四期、多中心、随机、对照临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):251-258. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30668-4. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
5
Risk of breast implant removal after one- versus two-stage breast reconstructive surgery.一期与二期乳房重建手术后乳房假体取出的风险。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1610-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.112. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.脱细胞真皮基质一期植入式乳房重建与两期乳房重建(BRIOS)后生活质量和患者满意度比较:一项随机对照试验的主要结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1205-1214. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30378-4. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve? A qualitative study.乳房重建随机对照试验中感知到的障碍:是试验启动的障碍还是解决的机会?一项定性研究。
Trials. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4227-1.
8
The Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.辅助放疗对即刻胸前预置假体乳房重建的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jul;48(13):2432-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03661-z. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
9
Single versus Double Drainage for Immediate Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.单管引流与双管引流在即刻二期基于假体的乳房重建中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Sep;48(17):3304-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03800-6. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.生物基质辅助一期基于植入物的乳房重建与两期基于植入物的乳房重建:患者报告的结果和并发症。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2581-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02509-8. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
"Microsurgical breast reconstruction - A salvage option for failed implant-based breast reconstruction".显微外科乳房重建——基于植入物的乳房重建失败后的挽救选择
Breast. 2025 Apr 22;82:104480. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104480.
2
Salvage of the Mastectomy Pocket in Infected Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.采用滴注式负压伤口治疗挽救感染的乳房植入物乳房重建术的乳房切除腔:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2730. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082730.
3
Assessment of Appearance-related Questions About Breast Reconstruction Generated by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer.由聊天生成式预训练变换器生成的关于乳房重建的外貌相关问题评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 21;13(3):e6625. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Patient-reported outcomes 3 and 18 months after mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.英国Pre - BRA前瞻性多中心队列研究中乳房切除术后3个月和18个月以及即刻胸肌前植入物乳房重建后的患者报告结局。
Br J Surg. 2025 Feb 1;112(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf032.
5
Patient Perspectives of "Failure" in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature: Points de vue des patients sur les «échecs» de la reconstruction mammaire: Revue systématique des publications sur l'aspect qualitatif.乳房重建中“失败”的患者观点:定性文献的系统评价:患者对乳房重建“失败”的观点:关于定性方面的系统文献综述
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Jan 15:22925503241311255. doi: 10.1177/22925503241311255.
6
Comparison of Single-Use Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (sNPWT) and Standard Dressings Applied to the Same Patient During Bilateral Tissue Expander-to-Implant Exchanges.一次性负压伤口治疗(sNPWT)与标准敷料在同一患者双侧组织扩张器至植入物置换过程中的应用比较。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;17(1):3. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010003.
7
Does the use of Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review.在同样的情况下,与不使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)相比,在接受假体乳房重建的女性中使用 ADM 是否会增加手术成功率?一项系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1186. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12978-0.
8
Gothenburg Breast reconstruction (GoBreast) II protocol: a Swedish partially randomised patient preference, superiority trial comparing autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction.哥德堡乳房重建(GoBreast)II方案:一项瑞典的部分随机化患者偏好、优效性试验,比较自体组织和乳房假体植入式乳房重建。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 17;14(7):e084025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084025.
9
Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.在同一环境下,与不使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)相比,在接受经胸肌前置假体乳房重建的女性中使用 ADM 是否会增加手术成功率?系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 7;13(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02564-7.
10
Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.钛涂层聚丙烯网(TiLOOP® Bra)在乳房重建中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar;48(5):925-935. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03500-1. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Salvage of the failed implant-based breast reconstruction using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A single centre experience with tertiary breast reconstruction.使用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣挽救失败的乳房植入物重建:三级乳房重建的单中心经验
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul;72(7):1075-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
2
Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.基于细胞外基质的一期植入式乳房重建与多中心随机临床试验中两期扩张器-植入物重建的短期成本效益比较。
Br J Surg. 2019 Apr;106(5):586-595. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11102. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life.自体乳房重建后失败的基于植入物的重建:手术和患者报告的结果及生活质量的评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):373-379. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005197.
4
Beyond 30 Days: A Risk Calculator for Longer Term Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.30天以上:乳房假体再造长期预后风险计算器
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 12;6(12):e2065. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002065. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.乳房切除术和即刻基于植入物的乳房重建(iBRA)有无网片的短期安全性结局:一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):254-266. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30781-2. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Tissue Expander Complications Do Not Preclude a Second Successful Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.组织扩张器并发症不排除二次成功的基于植入物的乳房重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005131.
7
A Multicenter Analysis Examining Patients Undergoing Conversion of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction to Abdominally based Free Tissue Transfer.一项多中心分析,研究接受基于植入物的乳房重建转换为基于腹部的游离组织移植的患者。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Nov;34(9):685-691. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641680. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
Nonresponse bias in survey research: lessons from a prospective study of breast reconstruction.调查研究中的无应答偏差:来自一项乳房重建前瞻性研究的经验教训。
J Surg Res. 2018 Apr;224:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.058. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Salvage of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies With Autologous Flaps.带蒂皮瓣自体组织乳房重建术中挽救假体乳房再造术的应用。
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Jun 13;38(7):734-741. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx247.
10
The association between complications and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer.乳腺癌乳房切除术和重建术后并发症与生活质量的关系。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3460-3467. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30788. Epub 2017 May 17.