• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身体素养环境评估(PLEA)工具的开发。

Development of the Physical Literacy Environmental Assessment (PLEA) tool.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0230447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230447. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230447
PMID:32182272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7077881/
Abstract

Physical literacy is becoming increasingly popular in sport, recreation, physical education and physical activity settings and programming. We developed an environmental assessment tool to evaluate the extent child and youth activity programs implement physical literacy across four domains: environment, programming, leaders and staff, and values and goals. The Physical Literacy Environmental Assessment (PLEA) tool was developed in 3 phases. First, the PLEA tool was created, content validity established, and physical literacy leaders were consulted. In the second phase, the PLEA tool was completed and tested by 83 child and youth programs and it was validated with individual physical literacy assessments completed on children in programs that scored in the top 10% and bottom 10% on the PLEA tool. Third, a National consultation was conducted, and program leaders provided feedback on the PLEA tool. In Phase 1, the PLEA tool was modified and shortened from 41 to 29 indicators, based on feedback from physical literacy content leaders. In Phase 2, participants in programs that scored in the top 10% had significantly higher scores on the upper body object control domain of PLAYfun (p = 0.018), and significantly higher PLAYself scores (p = 0.04) than participants in programs that scored in the bottom 10%. In Phase 3, over 80% of program leaders identified the PLEA tool was useful, and relevant to their areas of practice. The completed PLEA tool is a 20-item environmental assessment tool to evaluate to what degree child and youth programming implement physical literacy across four domains: environment, programming, leaders and staff, and values and goals. The application and validity of the PLEA tool beyond child and youth physical education, sport, dance and recreation sectors, such as in early years programs, should be investigated.

摘要

身体素养在运动、娱乐、体育教育和体育活动环境和项目中变得越来越流行。我们开发了一种环境评估工具,用于评估儿童和青少年活动项目在四个领域实施身体素养的程度:环境、项目、领导和工作人员以及价值观和目标。身体素养环境评估(PLEA)工具分三个阶段开发。首先,创建了 PLEA 工具,确定了内容有效性,并咨询了身体素养专家。在第二阶段,83 个儿童和青年项目完成并测试了 PLEA 工具,并通过对在 PLEA 工具中得分在前 10%和后 10%的项目中的儿童进行个别身体素养评估进行了验证。第三,进行了全国磋商,项目领导对 PLEA 工具提供了反馈。在第一阶段,根据身体素养内容专家的反馈,对 PLEA 工具进行了修改和缩短,从 41 项减少到 29 项指标。在第二阶段,在得分在前 10%的项目中的参与者在 PLAYfun 的上半身物体控制领域的得分明显更高(p = 0.018),并且 PLAYself 的得分明显更高(p = 0.04),而在得分在后 10%的项目中的参与者。在第三阶段,超过 80%的项目领导认为 PLEA 工具是有用的,并且与他们的实践领域相关。完成的 PLEA 工具是一个 20 项环境评估工具,用于评估儿童和青少年编程在四个领域实施身体素养的程度:环境、项目、领导和工作人员以及价值观和目标。应该研究 PLEA 工具在儿童和青年体育、运动、舞蹈和娱乐领域以外的应用和有效性,例如在早期教育项目中。

相似文献

1
Development of the Physical Literacy Environmental Assessment (PLEA) tool.身体素养环境评估(PLEA)工具的开发。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0230447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230447. eCollection 2020.
2
Outcomes and Feasibility of a 12-Week Physical Literacy Intervention for Children in an Afterschool Program.课后计划中 12 周身体素养干预对儿童的结果和可行性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 30;17(9):3129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093129.
3
The Association Between PLAYfun and Physical Activity: A Convergent Validation Study.PLAYfun 与身体活动的关联:一项聚合验证研究。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020 Jun;91(2):179-187. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1652723. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Are all domains created equal? An exploration of stakeholder views on the concept of physical literacy.所有领域都平等吗?对身体素养概念的利益相关者观点的探索。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12931-5.
5
Measurement properties of the Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth (PLAY) Tools.青少年体育素养评估工具(PLAY)的测量特性。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Jun;46(6):571-578. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0648. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy Second Edition: a streamlined assessment of the capacity for physical activity among children 8 to 12 years of age.加拿大体育素养评估第二版:一种简化的 8 至 12 岁儿童身体活动能力评估方法。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5902-y.
7
Psychometric properties and construct validity of PLAYself: a self-reported measure of physical literacy for children and youth.PLAYself 的心理测量学特性和结构效度:一种用于儿童和青少年的身体素养的自我报告测量工具。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Jun;46(6):579-588. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0410. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy: methods for children in grades 4 to 6 (8 to 12 years).加拿大身体素养评估:针对4至6年级(8至12岁)儿童的方法
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 11;15:767. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2106-6.
9
Refining the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy based on theory and factor analyses.基于理论和因子分析对加拿大身体素养评估进行优化。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5899-2.
10
Physical Literacy Knowledge Questionnaire: feasibility, validity, and reliability for Canadian children aged 8 to 12 years.身体素养知识问卷:加拿大 8 至 12 岁儿童的可行性、有效性和可靠性。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1035. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5890-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Global Physical Literacy (GloPL) Action Framework: Study protocol for a consensus process.制定全球身体素养(GloPL)行动计划框架:共识过程的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 12;19(8):e0307000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307000. eCollection 2024.
2
Physical literacy and health of Chinese medical students: the chain mediating role of physical activity and subjective well-being.医学生身体素养与健康:身体活动和主观幸福感的链式中介作用
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;12:1348743. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348743. eCollection 2024.
3
Relationship among positive self-esteem, physical literacy, and physical activity in college students: a study of a mediation model.

本文引用的文献

1
A Construct Validation Study of PLAYfun.PLAYfun 的结构验证研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Apr;50(4):855-862. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001494.
2
Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review.身体素养的定义、基础和关联:系统评价。
Sports Med. 2017 Jan;47(1):113-126. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7.
3
The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy: methods for children in grades 4 to 6 (8 to 12 years).加拿大身体素养评估:针对4至6年级(8至12岁)儿童的方法
大学生积极自尊、身体素养与体育活动之间的关系:一项中介模型研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 17;14:1097335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1097335. eCollection 2023.
4
Relationship Among Physical Literacy, Mental Health, and Resilience in College Students.大学生身体素质、心理健康与心理韧性之间的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 13;12:767804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.767804. eCollection 2021.
5
Physical Literacy, Physical Activity, and Health Indicators in School-Age Children.身体素养、身体活动与学龄儿童健康指标
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 25;17(15):5367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155367.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 11;15:767. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2106-6.
4
Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年的自主动机与身体活动:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
5
Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity.儿童运动技能熟练程度作为青少年身体活动的预测指标
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Mar;44(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
6
Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: a longitudinal assessment.感知运动能力在儿童运动技能熟练程度与青少年身体活动和健康之间起中介作用:一项纵向评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Aug 8;5:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-40.
7
A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in youth.青少年身体活动与久坐行为的相关因素简述。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1241-50. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318059bf35.