Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 May;248:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.039. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
To investigate the safety of uterine preservation in patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was accessed (1988-2014) and patients aged < = 45 years, diagnosed with an unilateral high-grade non-clear cell EOC confined to the ovary were selected. Based on surgery codes we determined whether hysterectomy was performed. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated calculated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Cox hazard model was constructed to control for possible confounders.
A total of 1039 patients with a median follow-up of 119 months were identified. Rate of uterine preservation was 31.8 %. Patients who had hysterectomy were older (median 41 vs 32 yrs, p < 0.001). Patients with mucinous tumors were less likely to undergo hysterectomy (58.9 %) compared to those with endometrioid (73.9 %) and serous (75.9 %) carcinoma, p < 0.001. There was no difference in CSS between patients who did and did not have hysterectomy, p = 0.70 (5-yr rates were 93.9 % vs 92.2 %, respectively). After controlling for year of diagnosis, tumor histology (serous vs non-serous), disease stage, performance of lymph node dissection (LND) and tumor grade, uterine preservation was not associated with a worse cancer-specific (HR: 1.08, 95 % CI:0.69,1.71) and overall (HR:0.88, 95 % CI: 0.59, 1.32) mortality.
In this retrospective cohort of patients with unilateral high-grade non-clear cell EOC confined to the ovary, uterine preservation was not associated with a worse prognosis.
探讨保留子宫在高级别上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者中的安全性。
检索监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(1988-2014 年),选择年龄< = 45 岁、单侧高级别非透明细胞 EOC 局限于卵巢且接受手术治疗的患者。根据手术代码,我们确定是否进行了子宫切除术。通过生成 Kaplan-Meier 曲线计算总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS),并使用对数秩检验进行比较。构建 Cox 风险模型以控制可能的混杂因素。
共纳入 1039 例患者,中位随访时间为 119 个月。保留子宫的比例为 31.8%。接受子宫切除术的患者年龄较大(中位数 41 岁比 32 岁,p < 0.001)。与子宫内膜样(73.9%)和浆液性(75.9%)癌相比,黏液性肿瘤患者行子宫切除术的可能性较小(58.9%,p < 0.001)。行或不行子宫切除术的患者 CSS 无差异,p = 0.70(5 年生存率分别为 93.9%和 92.2%)。在校正诊断年份、肿瘤组织学(浆液性与非浆液性)、疾病分期、淋巴结清扫(LND)和肿瘤分级后,保留子宫与癌症特异性(HR:1.08,95%CI:0.69,1.71)和总体(HR:0.88,95%CI:0.59,1.32)死亡率增加无关。
在本回顾性单侧高级别非透明细胞卵巢癌局限于卵巢的患者队列中,保留子宫与预后较差无关。