Department of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Center for Human-Animal Interaction, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 15;17(6):1909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061909.
Animal Visitation Programs (AVPs) targeting college students' stress and academic success have increased, despite limited research on academic outcomes. This randomized controlled trial ( = 349) examined the effects of incorporating levels of Human-animal Interaction (HAI) (0%, 50% or 100%) with therapy dogs in a four-week academic stress management program. Conditions included (1) Academic Stress Management (ASM) content only (0% HAI) (2) Human-animal Interaction only (100% HAI) and (3) equal combinations of ASM content and HAI (50% HAI). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses examined the effects of students' risk status ( = 146; depression, anxiety, perceived stress, worry) and treatment condition on students' learning and study strategies at posttest and follow-up. The results showed interactions between condition and risk status demonstrating higher posttest levels of WILL (i.e., anxiety, attitude, motivation) ( = 0.582, = 0.005) and SELFREGULATION (i.e., concentration, self-testing, study aids, time management) ( = 0.501, = 0.031) for at-risk students receiving equal combinations of HAI and content presentations. Moderation effects remained at follow-up ( = 0.626, = 0.005; = 0.630, = 0.007). At-risk students receiving only HAI (100%) also showed higher levels of WILL at posttest ( = 0.481, = 0.021) and follow up ( = 0.490, = 0.038). University administrators should consider providing at-risk students with targeted programs with varying levels of HAI and ASM content, depending on the targeted academic outcome.
动物探访项目(AVP)针对大学生的压力和学业成功而增加,尽管对学业成果的研究有限。这项随机对照试验(= 349)检验了在四周的学术压力管理计划中结合治疗犬的人类与动物互动(HAI)水平(0%、50%或 100%)对学业成绩的影响。条件包括(1)仅学术压力管理(ASM)内容(0%HAI),(2)仅人类与动物互动(100%HAI)和(3)ASM 内容和 HAI 的均等组合(50%HAI)。意向治疗(ITT)分析考察了学生的风险状况(= 146;抑郁、焦虑、感知压力、担忧)和治疗条件对学生在测试后和随访时学习和学习策略的影响。结果显示条件和风险状况之间的相互作用表明,接受 HAI 和内容呈现均等组合的高风险学生的 WILL(即焦虑、态度、动机)(= 0.582,= 0.005)和 SELFREGULATION(即专注、自我测试、学习辅助、时间管理)(= 0.501,= 0.031)在测试后有更高的水平。在随访时,调节效应仍然存在(= 0.626,= 0.005;= 0.630,= 0.007)。仅接受 HAI(100%)的高风险学生在测试后(= 0.481,= 0.021)和随访时(= 0.490,= 0.038)也显示出更高的 WILL 水平。大学管理人员应考虑根据目标学术成果,为高风险学生提供具有不同 HAI 和 ASM 内容水平的针对性项目。