• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪声污染对噪声暴露环境内外生物群落的直接和间接影响。

Direct and indirect effects of noise pollution alter biological communities in and near noise-exposed environments.

机构信息

Center for Environmental Biology and Ecosystem Studies, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.

Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Nishi 5, Kita 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;287(1923):20200176. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0176. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2020.0176
PMID:32183626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7126038/
Abstract

Noise pollution is pervasive across every ecosystem on Earth. Although decades of research have documented a variety of negative impacts of noise to organisms, key gaps remain, such as how noise affects different taxa within a biological community and how effects of noise propagate across space. We experimentally applied traffic noise pollution to multiple roadless areas and quantified the impacts of noise on birds, grasshoppers and odonates. We show that acoustically oriented birds have reduced species richness and abundance and different community compositions in experimentally noise-exposed areas relative to comparable quiet locations. We also found both acoustically oriented grasshoppers and odonates without acoustic receptors to have reduced species richness and/or abundance in relatively quiet areas that abut noise-exposed areas. These results suggest that noise pollution not only affects acoustically oriented animals, but that noise may reverberate through biological communities through indirect effects to those with no clear links to the acoustic realm, even in adjacent quiet environments.

摘要

噪声污染在地球上的每个生态系统中都普遍存在。尽管几十年来的研究已经记录了噪声对生物的各种负面影响,但仍存在一些关键的空白,例如噪声如何影响生物群落中的不同分类群,以及噪声如何在空间中传播。我们在多个无道路地区进行了交通噪声污染实验,并量化了噪声对鸟类、蝗虫和蜻蜓目昆虫的影响。我们发现,与可比的安静地点相比,在实验噪声暴露区,声学定向鸟类的物种丰富度和丰度降低,群落组成也不同。我们还发现,即使在与噪声暴露区相邻的相对安静的地区,没有声接收器的声学定向蝗虫和蜻蜓目昆虫的物种丰富度和/或丰度也降低了。这些结果表明,噪声污染不仅影响声学定向动物,而且噪声可能通过间接影响那些与声学领域没有明确联系的动物,在相邻的安静环境中也会产生回响,即使在相邻的安静环境中也是如此。

相似文献

1
Direct and indirect effects of noise pollution alter biological communities in and near noise-exposed environments.噪声污染对噪声暴露环境内外生物群落的直接和间接影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;287(1923):20200176. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0176. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Noise pollution alters the diet composition of invertebrate consumers both in and beyond a noise-exposed grassland ecosystem.噪声污染改变了受噪声影响的草原生态系统内外无脊椎消费者的饮食结构。
Ecol Lett. 2024 Jan;27(1):e14323. doi: 10.1111/ele.14323. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Traffic noise affects forest bird species in a protected tropical forest.交通噪音对一片受保护的热带森林中的森林鸟类物种产生影响。
Rev Biol Trop. 2011 Jun;59(2):969-80.
4
Acoustic environments matter: Synergistic benefits to humans and ecological communities.声学环境至关重要:对人类和生态群落的协同效益。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Dec 1;203(Pt 1):245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.041. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
Vocal traits and diet explain avian sensitivities to anthropogenic noise.鸣禽特征和饮食解释了鸟类对人为噪声的敏感程度。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 May;21(5):1809-20. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12862. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
6
Effects of grasshoppers on prairies: Herbivore composition matters more than richness in three grassland ecosystems.蝗虫对草原的影响:在三个草原生态系统中,食草动物的组成比丰富度更重要。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1727-1737. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12897. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
7
Effects of Experimental Anthropogenic Noise Exposure on the Reproductive Success of Secondary Cavity Nesting Birds.实验性人为噪声暴露对次生洞巢鸟类繁殖成功率的影响。
Integr Comp Biol. 2018 Nov 1;58(5):967-976. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy079.
8
Relationships between species richness, evenness, and abundance in a southwestern savanna.西南稀树草原中物种丰富度、均匀度和丰度之间的关系。
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1322-7. doi: 10.1890/06-0654.
9
An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road.交通噪声对鸟类分布影响的实验研究:避免幽灵道路。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Nov 6;280(1773):20132290. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2290. Print 2013 Dec 22.
10
Impacts of noise pollution from high-speed rail and road on bird diversity: a case study in a protected area of Italy.高铁和道路交通噪声污染对鸟类多样性的影响:以意大利一个保护区为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(22):32033-32042. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33372-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental noise and light pollution alter prey detection in a nocturnal bird of prey.实验性噪音和光污染会改变一种夜行性猛禽的猎物探测能力。
J Anim Ecol. 2025 Jul;94(7):1398-1409. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.70062. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Anuran communities increase aggregations of conspecific calls in response to aircraft noise.无尾目群落会因飞机噪音而增加同种叫声的聚集。
Curr Zool. 2024 Aug 16;71(2):223-232. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoae042. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Effects of Road-traffic Disturbances on the Bird Community of a Subtropical Island.道路交通干扰对亚热带岛屿鸟类群落的影响
Zool Stud. 2024 Apr 16;62:e6. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2024.63-06. eCollection 2024.
4
Understanding Environmental Consequences of Quarry Operations: Residents' Perception Study in the Neighbourhood of a Quarry in Osun state, Nigeria.了解采石场作业的环境影响:尼日利亚奥孙州一个采石场附近居民的认知研究
Environ Health Insights. 2024 Jun 22;18:11786302241264146. doi: 10.1177/11786302241264146. eCollection 2024.
5
Multiple constraints on urban bird communication: both abiotic and biotic noise shape songs in cities.城市鸟类交流面临多重限制:非生物噪声和生物噪声共同塑造了城市中的鸟鸣声。
Behav Ecol. 2021 Jul 13;32(5):1042-1053. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arab058. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
6
Long-term noise pollution affects seedling recruitment and community composition, with negative effects persisting after removal.长期的噪音污染会影响幼苗的补充和群落组成,即使在噪音源移除后,负面影响仍会持续存在。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 14;288(1948):20202906. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2906.

本文引用的文献

1
Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology.为什么保护生物学可以受益于感觉生态学。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr;4(4):502-511. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1135-4. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
Testing the AC/DC hypothesis: Rock and roll is noise pollution and weakens a trophic cascade.检验交流/直流假说:摇滚乐是噪音污染,会削弱营养级联效应。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 10;8(15):7649-7656. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4273. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
Sound the alarm: A meta-analysis on the effect of aquatic noise on fish behavior and physiology.拉响警报:关于水声对鱼类行为和生理影响的荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3105-3116. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14106. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
Alarm calls evoke a visual search image of a predator in birds.鸣叫声在鸟类中唤起了对捕食者的视觉搜索图像。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):1541-1545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718884115. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community.慢性人为噪声会破坏糖皮质激素信号传递,并对鸟类群落的适应度产生多种影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):E648-E657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1709200115. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
6
A general scaling law reveals why the largest animals are not the fastest.一般缩放定律揭示了为什么最大的动物不是最快的。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1116-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0241-4. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
7
Anthropogenic noise pollution from pile-driving disrupts the structure and dynamics of fish shoals.打桩作业产生的人为噪音污染会扰乱鱼群的结构和动态。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1627.
8
Anthropogenic noise changes arthropod abundances.人为噪音会改变节肢动物的数量。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 23;7(9):2977-2985. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2698. eCollection 2017 May.
9
Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas.美国保护区内普遍存在噪声污染。
Science. 2017 May 5;356(6337):531-533. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4783.
10
Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk.人为噪音干扰了对捕食风险的声音信息的利用。
Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:988-995. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Aug 29.