Suppr超能文献

噪声污染对噪声暴露环境内外生物群落的直接和间接影响。

Direct and indirect effects of noise pollution alter biological communities in and near noise-exposed environments.

机构信息

Center for Environmental Biology and Ecosystem Studies, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.

Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Nishi 5, Kita 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;287(1923):20200176. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0176. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Abstract

Noise pollution is pervasive across every ecosystem on Earth. Although decades of research have documented a variety of negative impacts of noise to organisms, key gaps remain, such as how noise affects different taxa within a biological community and how effects of noise propagate across space. We experimentally applied traffic noise pollution to multiple roadless areas and quantified the impacts of noise on birds, grasshoppers and odonates. We show that acoustically oriented birds have reduced species richness and abundance and different community compositions in experimentally noise-exposed areas relative to comparable quiet locations. We also found both acoustically oriented grasshoppers and odonates without acoustic receptors to have reduced species richness and/or abundance in relatively quiet areas that abut noise-exposed areas. These results suggest that noise pollution not only affects acoustically oriented animals, but that noise may reverberate through biological communities through indirect effects to those with no clear links to the acoustic realm, even in adjacent quiet environments.

摘要

噪声污染在地球上的每个生态系统中都普遍存在。尽管几十年来的研究已经记录了噪声对生物的各种负面影响,但仍存在一些关键的空白,例如噪声如何影响生物群落中的不同分类群,以及噪声如何在空间中传播。我们在多个无道路地区进行了交通噪声污染实验,并量化了噪声对鸟类、蝗虫和蜻蜓目昆虫的影响。我们发现,与可比的安静地点相比,在实验噪声暴露区,声学定向鸟类的物种丰富度和丰度降低,群落组成也不同。我们还发现,即使在与噪声暴露区相邻的相对安静的地区,没有声接收器的声学定向蝗虫和蜻蜓目昆虫的物种丰富度和/或丰度也降低了。这些结果表明,噪声污染不仅影响声学定向动物,而且噪声可能通过间接影响那些与声学领域没有明确联系的动物,在相邻的安静环境中也会产生回响,即使在相邻的安静环境中也是如此。

相似文献

1
Direct and indirect effects of noise pollution alter biological communities in and near noise-exposed environments.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;287(1923):20200176. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0176. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
Acoustic environments matter: Synergistic benefits to humans and ecological communities.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Dec 1;203(Pt 1):245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.041. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
Vocal traits and diet explain avian sensitivities to anthropogenic noise.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 May;21(5):1809-20. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12862. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
6
Effects of grasshoppers on prairies: Herbivore composition matters more than richness in three grassland ecosystems.
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1727-1737. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12897. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
9
An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road.
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Nov 6;280(1773):20132290. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2290. Print 2013 Dec 22.
10
Impacts of noise pollution from high-speed rail and road on bird diversity: a case study in a protected area of Italy.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(22):32033-32042. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33372-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental noise and light pollution alter prey detection in a nocturnal bird of prey.
J Anim Ecol. 2025 Jul;94(7):1398-1409. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.70062. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Anuran communities increase aggregations of conspecific calls in response to aircraft noise.
Curr Zool. 2024 Aug 16;71(2):223-232. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoae042. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Effects of Road-traffic Disturbances on the Bird Community of a Subtropical Island.
Zool Stud. 2024 Apr 16;62:e6. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2024.63-06. eCollection 2024.
4
Understanding Environmental Consequences of Quarry Operations: Residents' Perception Study in the Neighbourhood of a Quarry in Osun state, Nigeria.
Environ Health Insights. 2024 Jun 22;18:11786302241264146. doi: 10.1177/11786302241264146. eCollection 2024.
5
Multiple constraints on urban bird communication: both abiotic and biotic noise shape songs in cities.
Behav Ecol. 2021 Jul 13;32(5):1042-1053. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arab058. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr;4(4):502-511. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1135-4. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
Testing the AC/DC hypothesis: Rock and roll is noise pollution and weakens a trophic cascade.
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 10;8(15):7649-7656. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4273. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
Sound the alarm: A meta-analysis on the effect of aquatic noise on fish behavior and physiology.
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3105-3116. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14106. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
Alarm calls evoke a visual search image of a predator in birds.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):1541-1545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718884115. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):E648-E657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1709200115. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
6
A general scaling law reveals why the largest animals are not the fastest.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1116-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0241-4. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
7
Anthropogenic noise pollution from pile-driving disrupts the structure and dynamics of fish shoals.
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1627.
8
Anthropogenic noise changes arthropod abundances.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 23;7(9):2977-2985. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2698. eCollection 2017 May.
9
Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas.
Science. 2017 May 5;356(6337):531-533. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4783.
10
Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk.
Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:988-995. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验