• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对我来说重要的是 - 一个基于网络的长期护理客户偏好 elicitation 工具:以用户为中心的设计。

What matters to me - a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in long-term care: a user-centred design.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1067-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-1067-6
PMID:32183786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7077015/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the process of decision-making for long-term care, clients are often dependent on informal support and available information about quality ratings of care services. However, clients do not take ratings into account when considering preferred care, and need assistance to understand their preferences. A tool to elicit preferences for long-term care could be beneficial. Therefore, the aim of this qualitative descriptive study is to understand the user requirements and develop a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in need of long-term care.

METHODS

We applied a user-centred design in which end-users influence the development of the tool. The included end-users were clients, relatives, and healthcare professionals. Data collection took place between November 2017 and March 2018 by means of meetings with the development team consisting of four users, walkthrough interviews with 21 individual users, video-audio recordings, field notes, and observations during the use of the tool. Data were collected during three phases of iteration: Look and feel, Navigation, and Content. A deductive and inductive content analysis approach was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The layout was considered accessible and easy during the Look and feel phase, and users asked for neutral images. Users found navigation easy, and expressed the need for concise and shorter text blocks. Users reached consensus about the categories of preferences, wished to adjust the content with propositions about well-being, and discussed linguistic difficulties.

CONCLUSION

By incorporating the requirements of end-users, the user-centred design proved to be useful in progressing from the prototype to the finalized tool 'What matters to me'. This tool may assist the elicitation of client's preferences in their search for long-term care.

摘要

背景

在长期护理决策过程中,客户通常依赖于非正式支持和有关护理服务质量评级的可用信息。然而,客户在考虑首选护理时并不考虑评级,并且需要帮助来理解自己的偏好。一个可以引出长期护理偏好的工具可能会很有帮助。因此,本定性描述性研究的目的是了解用户需求,并为需要长期护理的客户开发一个基于网络的偏好引出工具。

方法

我们应用了以用户为中心的设计,其中最终用户会影响工具的开发。所包括的最终用户是客户、亲属和医疗保健专业人员。数据收集于 2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 3 月之间进行,采用与包括四名用户的开发团队举行会议、与 21 名个人用户进行的遍历式访谈、工具使用过程中的视频-音频记录、现场记录和观察相结合的方式。数据在迭代的三个阶段中收集:外观、导航和内容。使用演绎和归纳内容分析方法进行数据分析。

结果

在外观阶段,布局被认为是可访问且易于使用的,用户要求使用中性图像。用户发现导航很容易,并且表示需要简洁和较短的文本块。用户就偏好类别达成共识,希望用关于幸福感的提议来调整内容,并讨论了语言上的困难。

结论

通过纳入最终用户的需求,以用户为中心的设计被证明在从原型到最终工具“对我来说重要的是什么”的进展中是有用的。该工具可能有助于引出客户在寻找长期护理时的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/fb2375fca077/12911_2020_1067_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/8bfd4a3e8141/12911_2020_1067_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/57b9e212cef0/12911_2020_1067_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/fb2375fca077/12911_2020_1067_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/8bfd4a3e8141/12911_2020_1067_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/57b9e212cef0/12911_2020_1067_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfea/7077015/fb2375fca077/12911_2020_1067_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What matters to me - a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in long-term care: a user-centred design.对我来说重要的是 - 一个基于网络的长期护理客户偏好 elicitation 工具:以用户为中心的设计。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1067-6.
2
Clients and professionals elicit long-term care preferences by using 'What matters to me': A process evaluation in the Netherlands.客户和专业人员通过使用“对我重要的事”来引出长期护理偏好:荷兰的一项过程评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1037-e1047. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13509. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences.掌握长期护理决策过程。描述性案例说明了偏好构建的混乱现实。
PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0217338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217338. eCollection 2019.
4
Proposal for a Framework to Enable Elicitation of Preferences for Clients in Need of Long-Term Care.关于建立一个能够引出长期护理需求客户偏好的框架的提议。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Aug 25;14:1553-1566. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S257501. eCollection 2020.
5
Examining chronic care patient preferences for involvement in health-care decision making: the case of Parkinson's disease patients in a patient-centred clinic.探讨慢性护理患者在医疗决策中的参与偏好:以患者为中心诊所的帕金森病患者为例。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):655-664. doi: 10.1111/hex.12497. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design.制定一项决策指南,以支持老年人在护理地点决策方面的决策:一种迭代的、以用户为中心的设计。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jul 19;2:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0040-0. eCollection 2016.
7
Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.使用以用户为中心的设计方法开发一种基于网络的患者决策辅助工具,用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5.
8
Dissemination of a Web-Based Tool for Supporting Health Insurance Plan Decisions (Show Me Health Plans): Cross-Sectional Observational Study.用于支持健康保险计划决策的基于网络的工具(向我展示健康计划)的传播:横断面观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 20;20(6):e209. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9829.
9
The EU-project United4Health: User-centred design of an information system for a Norwegian telemedicine service.欧盟项目“联合促进健康”:以用户为中心设计挪威远程医疗服务信息系统。
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Oct;22(7):422-9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15615048. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Online, Interactive Option Grid Patient Decision Aids and their Effect on User Preferences.在线互动选项网格式患者决策辅助工具及其对用户偏好的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):56-68. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17734538. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
2
Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.公民参与健康、护理或福祉技术创新研究:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01152-4.
3
Shared decision-making with adults transitioning to long-term care: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences.掌握长期护理决策过程。描述性案例说明了偏好构建的混乱现实。
PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0217338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217338. eCollection 2019.
2
How to weight patient-relevant treatment goals for assessing treatment benefit in psoriasis: preference elicitation methods vs. rating scales.如何权衡与患者相关的治疗目标,以评估银屑病的治疗获益:偏好 elicitation 方法与评分量表。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Sep;310(7):567-577. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1846-4. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
3
成人向长期护理过渡的共同决策:范围综述。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12518. doi: 10.1111/opn.12518. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
The Tell me tool: The development and feasibility of a tool for person-centred infertility care.“告诉我”工具:一种以患者为中心的不孕症护理工具的开发与可行性
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):1081-1093. doi: 10.1111/hex.13455. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
5
Clients and professionals elicit long-term care preferences by using 'What matters to me': A process evaluation in the Netherlands.客户和专业人员通过使用“对我重要的事”来引出长期护理偏好:荷兰的一项过程评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1037-e1047. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13509. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
Choosing Wisely in primary care: Moving from recommendations to implementation.
基层医疗中的明智选择:从建议到实施。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 May;64(5):336-338.
4
Use of an Online Clinical Process Support System as an Aid to Identification and Management of Developmental and Mental Health Problems.使用在线临床流程支持系统辅助识别和管理发育及心理健康问题。
Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):108-117. doi: 10.1007/s40474-017-0124-z. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design.制定一项决策指南,以支持老年人在护理地点决策方面的决策:一种迭代的、以用户为中心的设计。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jul 19;2:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0040-0. eCollection 2016.
6
Developing a patient decision aid for the treatment of women with early stage breast cancer: the struggle between simplicity and complexity.为早期乳腺癌女性治疗开发患者决策辅助工具:简单与复杂之间的斗争。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0505-6.
7
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceptions of self-management support interactions: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis.患者和医疗保健专业人员对自我管理支持互动的看法:系统评价与定性综合分析
Chronic Illn. 2018 Jun;14(2):79-103. doi: 10.1177/1742395317710082. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
"I'm still here": Exploring what matters to people with intellectual disability during advance care planning.“我仍在这里”:探索在预先护理计划过程中对智障人士重要的事项。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 Nov;30(6):1089-1098. doi: 10.1111/jar.12355. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Outcome prioritisation tool for medication review in older patients with multimorbidity: a pilot study in general practice.老年多病共存患者药物治疗评估的结局优先级工具:一项全科医疗的试点研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e501-e506. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X690485. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
10
Eliciting Preferences of Multimorbid Elderly Adults in Family Practice Using an Outcome Prioritization Tool.使用结果优先级工具引出家庭医疗中患有多种疾病的老年人的偏好。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):e143-e148. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14415. Epub 2016 Sep 9.