• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Haemo-Adhaesione: A New Measure of Adherence for Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia.血液黏附:一种针对青少年和成年血友病患者依从性的新测量方法。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 3;14:455-465. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S233601. eCollection 2020.
2
Validation of the Spanish Version of the VERITAS-PRN Scale to Assess Adherence to on Demand Regimens in Patients with Hemophilia.用于评估血友病患者按需治疗方案依从性的VERITAS-PRN量表西班牙语版本的验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 May 11;15:967-974. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S310662. eCollection 2021.
3
VERITAS-PRN: a new measure of adherence to episodic treatment regimens in haemophilia.VERITAS-PRN:一种评估血友病间歇性治疗方案依从性的新方法。
Haemophilia. 2010 Jan;16(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02094.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
4
VERITAS-Pro: a new measure of adherence to prophylactic regimens in haemophilia.VERITAS-Pro:一种评估血友病预防治疗方案依从性的新方法。
Haemophilia. 2010 Mar;16(2):247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02129.x. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
5
Adherence to treatment in a Western European paediatric population with haemophilia: reliability and validity of the VERITAS-Pro scale.西欧血友病儿科人群的治疗依从性:VERITAS-Pro量表的信度和效度
Haemophilia. 2014 Sep;20(5):616-23. doi: 10.1111/hae.12463. Epub 2014 May 26.
6
Validation of the VERITAS-Pro treatment adherence scale in a Spanish sample population with hemophilia.VERITAS-Pro治疗依从性量表在西班牙血友病样本人群中的验证。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Mar 27;11:653-660. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S126828. eCollection 2017.
7
Evaluation of the U.S. Adherence Questionnaires VERITAS-PRO and VERITAS-PRN for Use in Patients with Hemophilia in the German Healthcare System.评估美国依从性问卷 VERITAS-PRO 和 VERITAS-PRN 在德国医疗体系中用于血友病患者的适用性。
Hamostaseologie. 2020 Dec;40(5):621-630. doi: 10.1055/a-1249-4645. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
Cross-cultural development and psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported health-related quality of life questionnaire for adults with haemophilia.血友病成年患者自我报告的健康相关生活质量问卷的跨文化开发与心理测量学评估
Haemophilia. 2008 Sep;14(5):1023-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01812.x. Epub 2008 Jul 28.
9
Validation of the Brazilian version of the VERITAS-Pro scale to assess adherence to prophylactic regimens in hemophilia.用于评估血友病预防性治疗方案依从性的巴西版VERITAS-Pro量表的验证
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;40(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
10
Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool for adults with haemophilia (the HAEMO-SYM).血友病成人患者报告症状评估工具(HAEMO-SYM)的心理计量学评估。
Haemophilia. 2009 Sep;15(5):1039-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01955.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Literature Review of Outcomes Associated With Adherence to Haemophilia Drug Therapy.血友病药物治疗依从性相关结局的系统文献综述
Haemophilia. 2025 Mar;31(2):187-206. doi: 10.1111/hae.15153. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
The Limitations and Unmet Needs of the Five Cornerstones to Guarantee Lifelong Optimization of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients.血友病患者预防终身优化的五大基石的局限性与未满足需求
TH Open. 2022 Nov 11;6(4):e365-e377. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757745. eCollection 2022 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment adherence in hemophilia.血友病的治疗依从性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 27;11:1677-1686. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S139851. eCollection 2017.
2
Validation of the VERITAS-Pro treatment adherence scale in a Spanish sample population with hemophilia.VERITAS-Pro治疗依从性量表在西班牙血友病样本人群中的验证。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Mar 27;11:653-660. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S126828. eCollection 2017.
3
Adherence to Prophylaxis in Adolescents and Young Adults with Severe Haemophilia: A Quantitative Study with Patients.青少年和青年重型血友病患者预防治疗的依从性:一项针对患者的定量研究
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0169880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169880. eCollection 2017.
4
Applying a deliberation model to the analysis of consultations in haemophilia: Implications for doctor-patient communication.将审议模型应用于血友病会诊分析:对医患沟通的启示。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):690-695. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
5
Recognizing the need for personalization of haemophilia patient-reported outcomes in the prophylaxis era.认识到在预防治疗时代对血友病患者报告结局进行个性化的必要性。
Haemophilia. 2016 Nov;22(6):825-832. doi: 10.1111/hae.13066. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Adherence to prophylactic treatment in patients with haemophilia in Germany.德国血友病患者预防性治疗的依从性。
Haemophilia. 2016 Sep;22(5):e367-74. doi: 10.1111/hae.13003. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Adherence to prophylaxis and bleeding outcome in haemophilia: a multicentre study.血友病患者预防治疗的依从性与出血结局:一项多中心研究。
Br J Haematol. 2016 Aug;174(3):454-60. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14072. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
8
Promoting self-management and adherence during prophylaxis: evidence-based recommendations for haemophilia professionals.在预防治疗期间促进自我管理和依从性:针对血友病专业人员的循证建议
Haemophilia. 2016 Jul;22(4):499-506. doi: 10.1111/hae.12904. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
Key components of effective collaborative goal setting in the chronic care encounter.慢性病护理过程中有效协作目标设定的关键组成部分。
Commun Med. 2014;11(2):103-15. doi: 10.1558/cam.v11i2.21600.
10
Factors influencing illness representations and perceived adherence in haemophilic patients: a pilot study.
Haemophilia. 2015 Sep;21(5):598-604. doi: 10.1111/hae.12654. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

血液黏附:一种针对青少年和成年血友病患者依从性的新测量方法。

Haemo-Adhaesione: A New Measure of Adherence for Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia.

作者信息

Torres-Ortuño Ana, Cuesta-Barriuso Rubén, Nieto-Munuera Joaquín, Castiello-Munuera Álvaro, Moreno-Moreno Manuel, López-Pina José Antonio

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Social Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Association of Hemophilia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 3;14:455-465. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S233601. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S233601
PMID:32184574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7060779/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To build a multidimensional questionnaire of adherence for a patient with hemophilia that includes not only clinical but also psychosocial aspects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-six patients with haemophilia (A and B) were recruited from several Hemophilia Treatment Centers for this study. The recruitment was performed through a personal interview (20-25 mins for each patient). A literature review was carried out (different databases). In the first version (136 items), all items were subjected to an external judgment (experts in hemophilia) and also presented and discussed with a group of patients. It was made a study of content validity and homogeneity index and reliability coefficients of score were calculated with an alpha coefficient. Empirical validation was made with Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

The Haemo-Adhaesione scale was composed of 5 dimensions and 10 questions about basic haemophilia concepts. It was shown to be valid and reliable to assess adherence in the Spanish population. Its internal consistency was good in all dimensions. The Rasch model was used to confirm the multidimensional structure of the scale. Significant and negative correlations were observed with the VERITAS-Pro and VERITAS-PRN scale in all dimensions, and in the total score.

CONCLUSIONS

The Haemo-Adhaesione scale is a good measure of adherence for PWH. Its multidimensional structure favors the inclusion of the objective and subjective aspects implicit in its definition, as well as its dynamic nature. Patients with greater adherence are those who have more awareness of their disease, and as a result, they are more compliant with prescription and their self-care. It also discriminates between patients who follow one treatment or another.

摘要

目的

构建一份针对血友病患者的多维依从性问卷,该问卷不仅涵盖临床方面,还包括社会心理层面。

患者与方法

本研究从多个血友病治疗中心招募了146例血友病(A 型和 B 型)患者。通过个人访谈(每位患者20 - 25分钟)进行招募。开展了文献综述(不同数据库)。在第一版(136项)中,所有条目都经过了外部评判(血友病专家),并向一组患者展示和讨论。进行了内容效度研究,计算了同质性指数,并使用α系数计算得分的可靠性系数。通过皮尔逊相关性进行实证验证。

结果

血友病依从性量表由5个维度和10个关于血友病基本概念的问题组成。在西班牙人群中,该量表被证明在评估依从性方面有效且可靠。其在所有维度的内部一致性良好。使用拉施模型确认了量表的多维结构。在所有维度以及总分中,均观察到与VERITAS - Pro和VERITAS - PRN量表存在显著的负相关。

结论

血友病依从性量表是评估血友病患者依从性的良好工具。其多维结构有利于纳入定义中隐含的客观和主观方面,以及其动态性质。依从性较高的患者是那些对自身疾病有更强认识的患者,因此他们更能遵守医嘱并进行自我护理。它还能区分接受不同治疗的患者。