Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60872-z.
Thyroid nodules are initially handled by fine needle aspiration (FNA). However, the stance of thyroid core needle biopsy (CNB) still is a challenge. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances and conclusive rates of FNA and CNB for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules and to define effective indications of CNB. This retrospective study enrolled 1,060 consecutive thyroid nodules in 1,037 patients who underwent FNA from January 2008 to May 2008, and 462 consecutive nodules in 453 patients who underwent CNB from January 2014 to December 2015 at our institution. Ultrasound (US) features were classified according to the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and Korean TIRADS (K-TIRADS). We compared diagnostic performances and conclusive rates between FNA and CNB groups. Propensity score matching was conducted to match FNA patients with CNB patients. After matching, the diagnostic performances for selecting surgical candidates and predicting malignancy were comparable between the two biopsy groups. Based on US findings, conclusive results were obtained significantly more in CNB than in FNA when thyroid nodules were classified as ACR TI-RADS or K-TIRADS category 4 and measured larger than 2 cm. Diagnostic performances between FNA and CNB were comparable. Superiority of CNB to FNA was found for thyroid nodules larger than 2 cm and classified as ACR TI-RADS or K-TIRADS category 4.
甲状腺结节最初通过细针抽吸(FNA)进行处理。然而,甲状腺核心针活检(CNB)的立场仍然是一个挑战。本研究旨在比较 FNA 和 CNB 对甲状腺结节诊断的诊断性能和结论率,并确定 CNB 的有效指征。本回顾性研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2008 年 5 月在我院接受 FNA 的 1037 例患者的 1060 个连续甲状腺结节,以及 2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月在我院接受 CNB 的 453 例患者的 462 个连续甲状腺结节。超声(US)特征根据美国放射学院甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)和韩国 TIRADS(K-TIRADS)进行分类。我们比较了 FNA 和 CNB 组之间的诊断性能和结论率。采用倾向评分匹配将 FNA 患者与 CNB 患者进行匹配。匹配后,两种活检组在选择手术候选者和预测恶性肿瘤方面的诊断性能相当。根据 US 结果,当甲状腺结节被分类为 ACR TI-RADS 或 K-TIRADS 类别 4 且大于 2cm 时,CNB 比 FNA 更能获得明确的结果。FNA 和 CNB 的诊断性能相当。当甲状腺结节大于 2cm 且被分类为 ACR TI-RADS 或 K-TIRADS 类别 4 时,CNB 优于 FNA。