• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马哈拉施特拉邦浦那医学院野外实习区繁殖的生物-生态-社会决定因素。

Bio-eco-social determinants of breeding in field practice area of a medical college in Pune, Maharashtra.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Scientist G, Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Public Health. 2019 Oct-Dec;63(4):324-329. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_296_18.

DOI:10.4103/ijph.IJPH_296_18
PMID:32189652
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major determinant of dengue incidence is interaction between ecology, vector bionomics, and social factors.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to find out bio-eco-social determinants of Aedes breeding.

METHODS

Background, household, entomological, and knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) surveys were undertaken post- and premonsoon showers from May to June 2016 in urban and rural practice area of medical college.

RESULTS

A total of 181 and 204 households, 131 and 137 individuals, and 1250 and 1268 water-holding containers were included in household survey, KAP survey, and larval survey in urban slum and rural area, respectively. In both locations, maximum water-holding containers were indoors (41.4% and 61.8%, respectively); however, maximum positivity was peridomestic (63.6% and 83.1%, respectively). Pupae per container were 0.9 and 1.9 in respective locations and pupae per person were 1.2 and 2.3, respectively. Container positivity was seen in containers with rain as water source (8.8%) as well as among those who were never used (10.7%). Irregular water supply was significantly more in rural area (P < 0.05). KAP survey revealed that majority (90.1% and 71.5%, respectively) had heard about dengue, with significantly higher knowledge in urban slum, and television was the main source of information. Majority (89% and 83%, respectively) were unaware that peak biting time of Aedes is daytime. Use of mosquito repellent coils was the predominant preventive practice (46.6% and 61.2%, respectively). Pupae were reared; all were found to be Aedes aegypti.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enhanced awareness campaigns, an integrated vector management approach is required for prevention of dengue.

摘要

背景

登革热发病率的主要决定因素是生态、媒介生物学和社会因素之间的相互作用。

目的

本研究旨在找出蚊虫滋生的生物-生态-社会决定因素。

方法

2016 年 5 月至 6 月,在后季风和前季风降雨后,在医学院的城市和农村实践区进行了背景、家庭、昆虫学和知识、态度和实践(KAP)调查。

结果

在城市贫民窟和农村地区的家庭调查、KAP 调查和幼虫调查中,分别纳入了 181 户和 204 户、131 人和 137 人、1250 个和 1268 个储水容器。在这两个地方,最大的储水容器都在室内(分别为 41.4%和 61.8%);然而,最高的阳性率是家庭周围(分别为 63.6%和 83.1%)。每个容器的蛹数分别为 0.9 和 1.9,每人的蛹数分别为 1.2 和 2.3。容器阳性见于雨水为水源的容器(8.8%)和从未使用过的容器(10.7%)。农村地区的不规则供水明显较多(P < 0.05)。KAP 调查显示,大多数人(分别为 90.1%和 71.5%)听说过登革热,城市贫民窟的知识水平明显较高,电视是主要的信息来源。大多数人(分别为 89%和 83%)不知道伊蚊的叮咬高峰时间是白天。使用蚊香是主要的预防措施(分别为 46.6%和 61.2%)。培养了蛹,全部都是埃及伊蚊。

结论

尽管开展了增强意识运动,但仍需要采取综合的病媒控制方法来预防登革热。

相似文献

1
Bio-eco-social determinants of breeding in field practice area of a medical college in Pune, Maharashtra.马哈拉施特拉邦浦那医学院野外实习区繁殖的生物-生态-社会决定因素。
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Oct-Dec;63(4):324-329. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_296_18.
2
Aedes aegypti breeding ecology in Guerrero: cross-sectional study of mosquito breeding sites from the baseline for the Camino Verde trial in Mexico.墨西哥格雷罗州埃及伊蚊的繁殖生态:墨西哥绿道试验基线期蚊虫繁殖地的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4293-9.
3
Characterization and productivity profiles of Aedes aegypti (L.) breeding habitats across rural and urban landscapes in western and coastal Kenya.肯尼亚西部和沿海地区城乡景观中埃及伊蚊(L.)繁殖栖息地的特征及生产力概况
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jul 12;10(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2271-9.
4
Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by adoption of eco-health methods in Chennai City, India.印度钦奈市采用生态健康方法进行基于社区的埃及伊蚊控制。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):488-96. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000056.
5
Pupal productivity in rainy and dry seasons: findings from the impact survey of a randomised controlled trial of dengue prevention in Guerrero, Mexico.雨季和旱季的蛹生产率:墨西哥格雷罗州登革热预防随机对照试验影响调查的结果
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4294-8.
6
Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban settings of Latin America: a multi-country study.拉丁美洲五个城市环境、生物和社会因素对登革热传播媒介滋生的影响:一项多国研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jan 21;14:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-38.
7
Ecological, Social, and Other Environmental Determinants of Dengue Vector Abundance in Urban and Rural Areas of Northeastern Thailand.泰国东北部城乡登革热媒介丰度的生态、社会和其他环境决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 2;18(11):5971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115971.
8
Location, seasonal, and functional characteristics of water holding containers with juvenile and pupal Aedes aegypti in Southern Taiwan: A cross-sectional study using hurdle model analyses.台湾南部伊蚊幼蚊和蛹的持水容器的位置、季节性和功能特征:使用障碍模型分析的横断面研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Oct 15;12(10):e0006882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006882. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
Community-centred approach for the control of Aedes spp. in a peri-urban zone in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands using temephos.在安达曼和尼科巴群岛的一个城郊地区,采用杀螟硫磷以社区为中心控制伊蚊属蚊虫的方法。
Natl Med J India. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):116-20.
10
Source reduction with a purpose: Mosquito ecology and community perspectives offer insights for improving household mosquito management in coastal Kenya.有针对性地减少蚊虫数量:蚊虫生态学和群落观点为改善肯尼亚沿海地区家庭蚊虫管理提供了新的思路。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 May 11;14(5):e0008239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008239. eCollection 2020 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Capacity Building for Dengue Prevention: A Comprehensive Training Approach in Two Medical Colleges in Puducherry, India.登革热预防能力建设:印度本地治里两所医学院校的综合培训方法
Cureus. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):e77042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77042. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Yellow fever in Asia-a risk analysis.亚洲的黄热病——风险分析。
J Travel Med. 2021 Apr 14;28(3). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab015.