Ok Hyun-Soo, Kim Woo-Sung, Ha Yong-Chan, Lim Jae-Young, Jung Chan-Woo, Lee Young-Kyun, Koo Kyung-Hoi
Chung-Ang University H.C.S. Hyundae General Hospital, Namyangju, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Bone Metab. 2020 Feb;27(1):65-70. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.1.65. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
Alarm services in the Order Communication System improve awareness for related physicians including orthopaedic surgeons, internal medicine doctors, and other relevent doctors. This prospective observational multicenter study was to compare the diagnostic and treatment rates of osteoporosis between an alarm service group and a no alarm service group.
From January 2017 to december 2017, The subjects included patients aged 50 years or older with hip fractures from 16 hospital-based multicenter cohorts. Among the 16 hospitals, 5 university hospitals established an alarm service for osteoporosis management (i.e., Alarm group) and 11 university hospitals did not set-up alarm services (i.e., Control group). The rate of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test and the initiation rate of antiosteoporosis medications between the 2 groups were compared at enrollment and at 6 months follow-up.
During the study period, 1,405 patients were enrolled. The DXA examination rate and initiation rate of osteoporosis treatment between the Alarm group and the Control group were 484 patients (89.8%) vs. 642 patients (74.1%) (<0.001) and 355 patients (65.9%) versus 294 patients (33.9%) (<0.001), respectively. At 6 months follow-up, the rate of anti-osteoporosis management between the 2 groups decreased (57.8% vs. 29.4%).
This prospective multicenter study demonstrates that alarm services can improve awareness of physicians, and it resulted in a significantly higher rate of examination of DXA and initiation of anti-osteoporosis medication in the Alram group. Therefore, alarm service is a simple and effective tool to increase anti-osteoporosis management as part of the fractuure liaison service in South Korea.
医嘱通信系统中的警报服务可提高包括骨科医生、内科医生及其他相关医生在内的相关医师的认知度。本前瞻性观察性多中心研究旨在比较警报服务组和无警报服务组之间骨质疏松症的诊断率和治疗率。
2017年1月至2017年12月,研究对象包括来自16个医院多中心队列的50岁及以上髋部骨折患者。在这16家医院中,5家大学医院建立了骨质疏松症管理警报服务(即警报组),11家大学医院未设置警报服务(即对照组)。比较两组在入组时和随访6个月时的双能X线吸收法(DXA)检测率和抗骨质疏松药物起始率。
研究期间,共纳入1405例患者。警报组和对照组之间的DXA检查率和骨质疏松症治疗起始率分别为484例(89.8%)对642例(74.1%)(<0.001)和355例(65.9%)对294例(33.9%)(<0.001)。在随访6个月时,两组之间的抗骨质疏松管理率均下降(57.8%对29.4%)。
这项前瞻性多中心研究表明,警报服务可以提高医生的认知度,并且在警报组中DXA检查率和抗骨质疏松药物起始率显著更高。因此,在韩国,警报服务作为骨折联络服务的一部分,是增加抗骨质疏松管理的一种简单有效的工具。