Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Feb;47(2):264-281. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000818. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Under cognitive load theory, time pressure/urgency-induced arousal is a major contributor to pupil dilation during cognition. However, pupillometric encoding studies have failed to consider the possible role of time pressure/urgency effects, instead often assuming that encoding dilations directly reflect encoding strength. To isolate possible encoding strength and time pressure effects, we manipulated levels of processing (deep vs. shallow) and response deadlines (speeded vs. unspeeded) during verbal recognition memory encoding. Rather than reflecting encoding strength, pupil dilation signaled time pressure and decision urgency, as indicated by four findings. First, dilation was greater for speeded than unspeeded trials, yet later recognition was similar. Second, within every combination of levels of processing and response deadline, slower individual decisions yielded increased dilations compared to quicker decisions. Third, even when encoding dilations during deep and shallow tasks were closely matched, later recognition remained markedly higher for the deep trials. Finally, within every combination of levels of processing and response deadline, dilation levels were similar for items subsequently recognized (hits) versus subsequently forgotten (misses). Taken together, our results support a time pressure/decision urgency account: instead of directly reflecting encoding efficacy, pupillary dilation mainly reflects the arousal induced by an increasingly urgent demand to process information. In the discussion section, we consider other possible paradigms during which arousal-based dilations may forecast subsequent memory outcomes, unlike here. Nonetheless, we emphasize that even in these situations, the proximal cause of dilation would be the time pressure or urgency of information processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在认知负荷理论中,时间压力/紧迫感引起的觉醒是认知过程中瞳孔扩大的主要原因。然而,瞳孔测量编码研究未能考虑到时间压力/紧迫感的可能作用,而是常常假设编码扩张直接反映了编码强度。为了分离可能的编码强度和时间压力效应,我们在言语识别记忆编码过程中操纵了加工水平(深度与浅度)和反应时限(快速与非快速)。瞳孔扩张并没有反映编码强度,而是反映了时间压力和决策紧迫性,这有四个发现可以证明。首先,快速反应比非快速反应的试验瞳孔扩张更大,但随后的识别却相似。其次,在每个加工水平和反应时限的组合中,个体的决策速度越慢,扩张程度越大,而决策速度越快,扩张程度越小。第三,即使在深度和浅度任务的编码扩张非常匹配的情况下,深度任务的后续识别率仍然明显更高。最后,在每个加工水平和反应时限的组合中,随后被识别(命中)的项目与随后被遗忘(错过)的项目的扩张水平相似。总之,我们的研究结果支持了时间压力/决策紧迫性的解释:瞳孔扩张并没有直接反映编码效率,而是主要反映了处理信息的紧急需求引起的觉醒。在讨论部分,我们考虑了其他可能的范式,在这些范式中,基于觉醒的扩张可能预测随后的记忆结果,但与这里不同。尽管如此,我们还是强调,即使在这些情况下,扩张的直接原因也是信息处理的时间压力或紧迫性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。