Suppr超能文献

奖励引起的唤醒对情景记忆提取的成功和准确性的影响。

The effect of reward-induced arousal on the success and precision of episodic memory retrieval.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):2105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52486-6.

Abstract

Moment-to-moment fluctuations in arousal can have large effects on learning and memory. For example, when neutral items are predictive of a later reward, they are often remembered better than neutral items without a reward association. This reward anticipation manipulation is thought to induce a heightened state of arousal, resulting in stronger encoding. It is unclear, however, whether these arousal-induced effects on encoding are 'all-or-none', or whether encoding precision varies from trial to trial with degree of arousal. Here, we examined whether trial-to-trial variability in reward-related pupil-linked arousal might correspond to variability in participants' long-term memory encoding precision. We tested this using a location memory paradigm in which half of the to-be-encoded neutral items were linked to later monetary reward, while the other half had no reward association. After the encoding phase, we measured immediate item location memory on a continuous scale, allowing us to assess both memory success and memory precision. We found that pre-item baseline pupil size and pupil size during item encoding were not related to subsequent memory performance. In contrast, the anticipation of instrumental reward increased pupil size, and a smaller anticipatory increase in pupil size was linked to greater subsequent memory success but not memory precision.

摘要

arousal 的瞬间波动对学习和记忆有很大的影响。例如,当中性项目对后续奖励有预测作用时,它们往往比没有奖励关联的中性项目更容易被记住。这种奖励预期的操纵被认为会引起更高的兴奋状态,从而导致更强的编码。然而,目前尚不清楚这些对编码的兴奋诱导效应是“全有或全无”的,还是编码精度随兴奋程度的变化而在每次试验中变化。在这里,我们研究了与奖励相关的瞳孔相关唤醒的试验间变异性是否可能与参与者的长期记忆编码精度的变异性相对应。我们使用位置记忆范式来检验这一点,在该范式中,一半的要编码的中性项目与后来的货币奖励相关联,而另一半则没有奖励关联。在编码阶段之后,我们在连续尺度上测量即时项目位置记忆,从而能够评估记忆成功和记忆精度。我们发现,项目前的基线瞳孔大小和项目编码过程中的瞳孔大小与随后的记忆表现无关。相比之下,工具性奖励的预期增加了瞳孔大小,而预期的瞳孔大小增加较小与更大的后续记忆成功但不是记忆精度相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/10808342/0c7139b4c603/41598_2024_52486_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验