Department of Psychology.
Bay Pines VA Health Care System.
Emotion. 2021 Jun;21(4):757-771. doi: 10.1037/emo0000745. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
We tested a dynamic structural equation model (DSEM; Asparouhov, Hamaker, & Muthén, 2018) of positive and negative affect in 254 veterans with approximately 1.5 years of experience sampling data. The analysis provided estimates of several aspects of veteran's emotional experience including "trait" positive and negative affect (i.e., mean levels), inertia (i.e., tendency for emotions to self-perpetuate), innovation variance (conceptualized as lability, reactivity, or exposure to stressors), and cross-lagged associations between positive and negative affect. Veterans with higher trait negative affect had more negative affect inertia and innovation variance. This suggests a pattern whereby the veteran has more negative reactions, and negative emotions, in turn, tend to maintain themselves, contributing to higher trait negative affect. In contrast, veterans with higher trait positive affect exhibited more positive affect innovation variance (e.g., positive reactivity). Although veterans showed some consistency in dynamics across emotions (e.g., positive and negative reactivity were positively correlated), trait positive and negative affect were not significantly associated. Veterans with higher posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) at baseline exhibited higher reactivity to negative events, less positive affect, and more negative affect during the follow-up. Veterans with higher distress tolerance reported not only lower PTSS but also a more adaptive pattern of affective experience characterized by lower inertia and reactivity in negative affect and more positive lagged associations between negative affect and subsequent positive affect. The results demonstrated that distress tolerance and PTSS in veterans were associated with dynamics of positive and negative emotion over time, suggesting specific differences in affect regulation processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
我们测试了一个 254 名退伍军人的动态结构方程模型(DSEM;Asparouhov、Hamaker 和 Muthén,2018),这些退伍军人大约有 1.5 年的经验采样数据。该分析提供了退伍军人情绪体验的几个方面的估计,包括“特质”正性和负性情绪(即平均水平)、惯性(即情绪自我延续的倾向)、创新方差(概念化为不稳定性、反应性或暴露于应激源)以及正性和负性情绪之间的交叉滞后关联。特质负性情绪较高的退伍军人具有更多的负性情绪惯性和创新方差。这表明了一种模式,即退伍军人有更多的负性反应,而负性情绪反过来又倾向于自我维持,导致特质负性情绪更高。相比之下,特质正性情绪较高的退伍军人表现出更多的正性情绪创新方差(例如,正性反应性)。尽管退伍军人在情绪之间表现出一些动态一致性(例如,正性和负性反应性呈正相关),但特质正性和负性情绪之间没有显著关联。基线时创伤后应激症状(PTSS)较高的退伍军人对负性事件的反应性较高,正性情绪较少,随访时负性情绪较多。具有较高的痛苦容忍度的退伍军人不仅报告了较低的 PTSS,而且还表现出更适应的情感体验模式,其特点是负性情绪的惯性和反应性较低,负性情绪和随后的正性情绪之间存在更多的滞后关联。结果表明,退伍军人的痛苦容忍度和 PTSD 与正性和负性情绪的时间动态有关,这表明了情绪调节过程中的具体差异。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。