Suppr超能文献

受精评估时移植源于单原核(1PN)受精卵的胚胎的价值。

Value of transferring embryos derived from monopronucleated (1PN) zygotes at the time of fertilization assessment.

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Medical, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing10091, China.

Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing10091, China.

出版信息

Zygote. 2020 Jun;28(3):241-246. doi: 10.1017/S096719942000009X. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Abstract

This paper is a retrospective analysis of the sole transfer of monopronucleated zygotes (1PN) embryos both in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to determine the value of transferring embryos formed from 1PN. In fresh cycles, 1PN cleavage-stage embryos (1PN cleavage fresh) were transferred. In frozen-thawed cycles, 1PN blastocyst-stage embryos (1PN blast frozen) were transferred. We used comparison groups: for fresh cycles, 2PN cleavage-stage embryos (2PN cleavage fresh) were transferred; and for frozen-thawed cycles, 2PN blastocyst-stage embryos (2PN blast frozen) were transferred. Comparison groups were matched for cycle and patient characteristics to the 1PN group. Finally, for fresh cycles, live birth rates (LBR) in the 1PN cleavage group were significantly lower than those in 2PN cleavage group, both for IVF [LBR = 7.64% vs. pregnancy rate (PR) = 22.12%, P = 0.003, respectively] and ICSI (LBR = 0% vs. LBR = 20.00%, P < 0.001, respectively). For frozen-thawed IVF cycles, the PR in the 1PN blastocyst group were comparable with those of the 2PN blastocyst group (1PN: LBR = 33.14% vs. 2PN: LBR = 37.24%, P = 0.289, respectively), while in ICSI, the PR in the 1PN blastocyst group were lower than those in the 2PN blastocyst group (LBR = 15.25% vs. LBR = 40.68%, P = 0.002, respectively). So, for IVF, blastocyst culture was capable of selecting normal 1PN embryos for transfer and achieves satisfying outcomes. However, for ICSI, blastocyst culture was not effective enough to eliminate abnormal embryos and 1PN embryo transfer needed to be treated with caution.

摘要

本文对体外受精(IVF)和胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)中单纯转移单核受精卵(1PN)胚胎进行回顾性分析,以确定转移由 1PN 形成的胚胎的价值。在新鲜周期中,转移 1PN 卵裂期胚胎(1PN 卵裂新鲜);在冷冻解冻周期中,转移 1PN 囊胚期胚胎(1PN 囊胚冷冻)。我们使用对照:对于新鲜周期,转移 2PN 卵裂期胚胎(2PN 卵裂新鲜);对于冷冻解冻周期,转移 2PN 囊胚期胚胎(2PN 囊胚冷冻)。对照与 1PN 组相匹配,匹配周期和患者特征。最后,在新鲜周期中,1PN 卵裂组的活产率(LBR)明显低于 2PN 卵裂组,无论是 IVF[LBR=7.64%vs. 妊娠率(PR)=22.12%,P=0.003]还是 ICSI(LBR=0%vs. LBR=20.00%,P<0.001)。对于冷冻解冻的 IVF 周期,1PN 囊胚组的 PR 与 2PN 囊胚组相当(1PN:LBR=33.14%vs. 2PN:LBR=37.24%,P=0.289),而在 ICSI 中,1PN 囊胚组的 PR 低于 2PN 囊胚组(LBR=15.25%vs. LBR=40.68%,P=0.002)。因此,对于 IVF,囊胚培养能够选择正常的 1PN 胚胎进行转移,并取得满意的结果。然而,对于 ICSI,囊胚培养不足以消除异常胚胎,需要谨慎对待 1PN 胚胎转移。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验