Suppr超能文献

保留Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:学习曲线内外科医生的倾向评分匹配分析。

Retzius-sparing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Surgeons in the Learning Curve: A Propensity Score-matching Analysis.

机构信息

Urology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology, Genoa, Italy.

Urology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jul;7(4):772-778. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several authors claimed that the Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) needs a prolonged learning curve, and outcomes during this phase could be suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the safety and outcomes of RS-RARP performed by young surgeons during the learning curve.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the pre-, intra-, and postoperative features of all the patients who underwent RS-RARP from 2013 to 2017. We divided our patients into two groups: patients operated by two experienced surgeons (ESs) with >100 procedures and patients operated on by five younger surgeons in the learning curve (LCSs). LCSs had no previous experience in radical prostatectomy, and the very first RS-RARP procedures of each LCS case are included in the analysis.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Perioperative, oncological, and functional data were analyzed. Short-term oncological results were reported as positive surgical margins (PSMs) and 1-yr disease-free survival. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Potency was defined as erections sufficient for intercourse; continence was defined as no pad or one safety liner. A propensity score-matching analysis was used to adjust the difference in baseline preoperative parameters between the groups.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We obtained two homogeneous groups of 256 patients each. After the matching, preoperative variables were similar in the two groups. The mean console time was longer for younger surgeons (98 vs 122 min, p < 0.001). Postoperative course, complications, and functional results were similar in the two groups; the final pathological analysis showed a worse T stage in the ES group (p = 0.017). PSMs and 1-yr disease-free survival did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RS-RARP can be safely performed by inexperienced surgeons who have received adequate training.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Surgeons in the learning curve can perform Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy safely, with similar early oncological results and functional outcomes.

摘要

背景

几位作者声称,保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RS-RARP)需要一个较长的学习曲线,在此阶段的结果可能不理想。

目的

验证年轻外科医生在学习曲线期间进行 RS-RARP 的安全性和结果。

设计、地点和参与者:我们对 2013 年至 2017 年间所有接受 RS-RARP 的患者的术前、术中和术后特征进行了回顾性分析。我们将患者分为两组:由两位经验丰富的外科医生(ES)进行手术的患者(超过 100 例)和在学习曲线中由五名年轻外科医生进行手术的患者(LCS)。LCS 之前没有根治性前列腺切除术的经验,每位 LCS 患者的首例 RS-RARP 手术均包括在分析中。

测量和统计学分析

分析围手术期、肿瘤学和功能数据。短期肿瘤学结果报告为阳性切缘(PSM)和 1 年无病生存率。并发症根据 Clavien-Dindo 系统分级。勃起功能定义为足以进行性交的勃起;尿控定义为无尿垫或一个安全衬垫。使用倾向评分匹配分析来调整两组间基线术前参数的差异。

结果和局限性

我们获得了两组各 256 例患者。匹配后,两组的术前变量相似。年轻外科医生的控制台时间较长(98 分钟与 122 分钟,p<0.001)。两组的术后过程、并发症和功能结果相似;最终的病理分析显示 ES 组的 T 分期较差(p=0.017)。PSM 和 1 年无病生存率在两组之间没有差异。

结论

接受过充分培训的无经验外科医生可以安全地进行 RS-RARP。

患者总结

处于学习曲线的外科医生可以安全地进行保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术,早期肿瘤学结果和功能结果相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验