Suppr超能文献

胸腔超声对胸水中渗出液与漏出液的鉴别诊断准确性。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Thoracic Ultrasonography to Differentiate Transudative From Exudative Pleural Effusion.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

Departments of Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

出版信息

Chest. 2020 Aug;158(2):692-697. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.051. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are limited data examining the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) in distinguishing transudative from exudative pleural effusions.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the diagnostic accuracy of TUS in distinguishing transudative from exudative effusions in consecutive patients with pleural effusion?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent TUS and subsequently a diagnostic thoracentesis with a pleural fluid analysis were identified. TUS images of the pleural effusions were interpreted by previously published criteria. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of TUS findings in predicting a transudative vs exudative pleural effusions and specific pleural diagnoses.

RESULTS

We evaluated 300 consecutive pleural effusions in 285 patients. The pleural effusions were classified as exudative in 229 of 300 cases (76%). TUS showed anechoic effusions in 122 of 300 cases (40%) and complex effusions in 178 of 300 cases (60%). An anechoic appearance on TUS was associated with exudative effusions (68/122; 56%) as compared with transudative effusions (54/122; 44%). The presence of a complex-appearing effusion on TUS was highly predictive of an exudative effusion (positive predictive value of 90%). However, none of the four TUS characteristics were highly specific of a pleural diagnosis.

INTERPRETATION

Thoracic ultrasonography is inadequate to diagnose a transudative pleural effusion reliably. Although the TUS findings of a complex effusion may suggest an exudative pleural effusion, specific pleural diagnoses cannot be predicted confidently.

摘要

背景

目前关于超声检查(TUS)在鉴别渗出性和漏出性胸腔积液方面的诊断准确性的数据有限。

研究问题

TUS 在鉴别连续胸腔积液患者的渗出性和漏出性胸腔积液方面的诊断准确性如何?

研究设计和方法

确定了接受 TUS 检查且随后进行胸腔积液分析的连续胸腔积液患者。根据先前发表的标准,对胸腔积液的 TUS 图像进行解释。我们评估了 TUS 结果在预测渗出性与漏出性胸腔积液和特定胸腔诊断方面的诊断性能。

结果

我们评估了 285 例患者的 300 例连续胸腔积液。300 例胸腔积液中,229 例(76%)被分类为渗出性。TUS 显示 122 例(40%)胸腔积液为无回声,178 例(60%)为复杂回声。TUS 上的无回声表现与渗出性胸腔积液相关(68/122;56%),而非漏出性胸腔积液(54/122;44%)。TUS 上表现为复杂回声的胸腔积液高度提示为渗出性胸腔积液(阳性预测值为 90%)。然而,TUS 的四种特征均不能高度预测胸腔积液的特定诊断。

结论

TUS 不足以可靠地诊断漏出性胸腔积液。尽管 TUS 发现复杂的胸腔积液可能提示渗出性胸腔积液,但不能有把握地预测特定的胸腔积液诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验