Milla Mirra Noor, Hudiyana Joevarian, Cahyono Wahyu, Muluk Hamdi
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;11:333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00333. eCollection 2020.
This study aims to describe how group leaders operate with their social ties of jihadi terrorists, using social network analysis. Data was collected through documents and interviews from terrorist detainees who were involved in jihadi terrorism activities in Indonesia. We found that relational trust with operational leaders plays an important role in terrorist social networks. More specifically, operational leaders possess a higher degree of centrality and betweenness centrality compared to ideological leaders, as operational leaders happened to possess stronger social ties (with close friends or respected authorities). Furthermore, we also found that terrorist networks in Indonesia consist of a large group of cells with low density, where members are not strongly connected to each other. The only bridges that were strong in these social networks were those involving operational leaders. This study confirmed previous studies that terrorist groups operate in a cell system, but lead to a novel finding that ideological leaders may play a limited or indirect influence in operational networks.
本研究旨在运用社会网络分析方法,描述团体领袖如何利用与圣战恐怖分子的社会关系开展行动。数据通过文件和对参与印度尼西亚圣战恐怖主义活动的恐怖分子 detainees 的访谈收集。我们发现,与行动领袖的关系信任在恐怖分子社会网络中发挥着重要作用。更具体地说,与意识形态领袖相比,行动领袖具有更高的中心性和中介中心性,因为行动领袖碰巧拥有更强的社会关系(与亲密朋友或受尊敬的权威人士)。此外,我们还发现,印度尼西亚的恐怖网络由大量低密度的细胞组成,成员之间联系并不紧密。这些社会网络中唯一强大的桥梁是那些涉及行动领袖的桥梁。本研究证实了先前的研究,即恐怖组织在细胞系统中运作,但得出了一个新发现,即意识形态领袖在行动网络中可能发挥有限或间接的影响。