Department of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;157(6):2125-2136. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.129. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
The study objective was to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of aortic root repair and aortic root replacement and provide evidence for root management in acute type A aortic dissection.
From 1996 to 2017, 491 patients underwent aortic root repair (n = 307) or aortic root replacement (n = 184) (62% bioprosthesis) for acute type A aortic dissection. Indications for aortic root replacement were intimal tear at the aortic root, root measuring 4.5 cm or more, connective tissue disease, or unrepairable aortic valvulopathy. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, and reoperation rate for root pathology.
Patients' median age was 61 years and 56 years in the aortic root repair group and aortic root replacement group, respectively. The aortic root replacement group had more renal failure requiring dialysis, previous cardiac intervention or surgery, heart failure, coronary malperfusion syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, and severe aortic insufficiency, as well as concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, tricuspid valve repair, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamp times but similar arch procedures. Perioperative outcomes were similar in the aortic root repair and aortic root replacement groups, including in-hospital mortality (8.5% and 8.2%), new-onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, and sepsis. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival was 62% and 65%, and the 15-year cumulative incidence of reoperation was 11% and 7% in the aortic root repair and aortic root replacement groups, respectively. The primary indication for root reoperation was aortic root aneurysm in the aortic root repair group and bioprosthetic valve deterioration in the aortic root replacement group.
Aortic root repair and aortic root replacement are appropriate surgical options for acute type A aortic dissection repair with favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Aortic root replacement should be performed for patients with acute type A aortic dissection presenting with an intimal tear at the aortic root, root aneurysm 4.5 cm or greater, connective tissue disease, or unrepairable aortic valvulopathy.
本研究旨在评估急性 A 型主动脉夹层主动脉根部修复和主动脉根部置换的围手术期及长期结果,并为急性 A 型主动脉夹层的根部处理提供依据。
1996 年至 2017 年间,491 例急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者接受主动脉根部修复(n=307)或主动脉根部置换(n=184)(62%为生物瓣)。主动脉根部置换的适应证为主动脉根部内膜撕裂、根部直径≥4.5cm、结缔组织疾病或无法修复的主动脉瓣病变。主要终点为院内死亡率、长期生存率和根部病变再次手术率。
患者的中位年龄分别为主动脉根部修复组 61 岁和主动脉根部置换组 56 岁。主动脉根部置换组患者中,肾衰竭需透析、既往心脏介入或手术、心力衰竭、冠状动脉灌注不良综合征、急性心肌梗死和严重主动脉瓣关闭不全的比例较高,且合并冠状动脉旁路移植术、三尖瓣修复术的比例较高,体外循环和主动脉阻断时间较长,但弓部处理相似。主动脉根部修复组和主动脉根部置换组的围手术期结果相似,包括院内死亡率(8.5%和 8.2%)、新发需要永久性透析的肾衰竭、卒中和心肌梗死及感染性休克。主动脉根部修复组和主动脉根部置换组 10 年生存率分别为 62%和 65%,15 年累积再手术率分别为 11%和 7%。主动脉根部修复组再手术的主要指征为主动脉根部瘤,主动脉根部置换组为生物瓣衰败。
主动脉根部修复和主动脉根部置换是急性 A 型主动脉夹层修复的合适手术选择,具有良好的短期和长期结果。对于急性 A 型主动脉夹层合并主动脉根部内膜撕裂、根部瘤直径≥4.5cm、结缔组织疾病或无法修复的主动脉瓣病变的患者,应行主动脉根部置换。