• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险标准化院内心脏骤停自主循环恢复率,以促进医院间比较。

Risk-Standardizing Rates of Return of Spontaneous Circulation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest to Facilitate Hospital Comparisons.

机构信息

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City.

University of Missouri Kansas City.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014837. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014837. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.119.014837
PMID:32200716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7428602/
Abstract

Background Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is the most proximal and direct assessment of acute resuscitation quality in hospitals. However, validated tools to benchmark hospital rates for ROSC after in-hospital cardiac arrest currently do not exist. Methods and Results Within the national Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, we identified 83 206 patients admitted from 335 hospitals from 2014 to 2017 with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Using hierarchical logistic regression, we derived and validated a model for ROSC, defined as spontaneous and sustained ROSC for ≥20 consecutive minutes, from 24 pre-arrest variables and calculated rates of risk-standardized ROSC for in-hospital cardiac arrest for each hospital. Overall, rates of ROSC were 72.0% and 72.7% for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The model in the derivation cohort had moderate discrimination (C-statistic 0.643) and excellent calibration ( of 0.996). Seventeen variables were associated with ROSC, and a parsimonious model retained 10 variables. Before risk-adjustment, the median hospital ROSC rate was 70.5% (interquartile range: 64.7-76.9%; range: 33.3-89.6%). After adjustment, the distribution of risk-standardized ROSC rates was narrower: median of 71.9% (interquartile range: 68.2-76.4%; range: 42.2-84.6%). Overall, 56 (16.7%) of 335 hospitals had at least a 10% absolute change in percentile rank after risk standardization: 27 (8.0%) with a ≥10% negative percentile change and 29 (8.7%) with a ≥10% positive percentile change. Conclusions We have derived and validated a model to risk-standardize hospital rates of ROSC for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Use of this model can support efforts to compare acute resuscitation survival across hospitals to facilitate quality improvement.

摘要

背景

自主循环恢复(ROSC)的持续时间是医院内急性复苏质量最直接的评估指标。然而,目前尚不存在用于基准化医院在院内心搏骤停后 ROSC 发生率的验证工具。

方法和结果

在全国 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 注册研究中,我们从 2014 年至 2017 年期间来自 335 家医院的 83206 例院内心搏骤停患者中确定了研究对象。使用分层逻辑回归,我们从 24 个心脏骤停前变量中得出并验证了一个 ROSC 模型,该模型定义为持续 20 分钟以上的自发和持续 ROSC,并计算了每个医院的院内心搏骤停风险标准化 ROSC 发生率。总体而言,推导队列和验证队列的 ROSC 发生率分别为 72.0%和 72.7%。推导队列中的模型具有中等的区分度(C 统计量 0.643)和极好的校准度(=0.996)。17 个变量与 ROSC 相关,一个简化模型保留了 10 个变量。在风险调整之前,医院 ROSC 率的中位数为 70.5%(四分位间距:64.7-76.9%;范围:33.3-89.6%)。调整后,风险标准化 ROSC 率的分布范围变窄:中位数为 71.9%(四分位间距:68.2-76.4%;范围:42.2-84.6%)。总体而言,在风险标准化后,335 家医院中有 56 家(16.7%)的百分位排名至少有 10%的绝对变化:27 家(8.0%)的负百分位变化≥10%,29 家(8.7%)的正百分位变化≥10%。

结论

我们已经得出并验证了一个用于风险标准化医院院内心搏骤停 ROSC 发生率的模型。该模型的使用可以支持比较医院间急性复苏存活率的努力,以促进质量改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e083/7428602/fd602ca51df4/JAH3-9-e014837-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e083/7428602/1f7e1cae6215/JAH3-9-e014837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e083/7428602/fd602ca51df4/JAH3-9-e014837-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e083/7428602/1f7e1cae6215/JAH3-9-e014837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e083/7428602/fd602ca51df4/JAH3-9-e014837-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-Standardizing Rates of Return of Spontaneous Circulation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest to Facilitate Hospital Comparisons.风险标准化院内心脏骤停自主循环恢复率,以促进医院间比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014837. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014837. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
2
Association Between Hospital Recognition for Resuscitation Guideline Adherence and Rates of Survival for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.医院对复苏指南依从性的认可与院内心脏骤停生存率之间的关联。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005429. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005429.
3
Risk-standardizing survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons.风险校正院内心脏骤停的生存率,以促进医院间比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 13;62(7):601-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.051. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
4
Association Between Hospital Debriefing Practices With Adherence to Resuscitation Process Measures and Outcomes for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.医院复苏后讨论实践与院内心脏骤停复苏流程措施及结果的相关性研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006695. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006695. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Trajectory of Risk-Standardized Survival Rates for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.院内心脏骤停风险标准化生存率的轨迹。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006514. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006514. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Cerebral Oximetry as a Real-Time Monitoring Tool to Assess Quality of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Post Cardiac Arrest Care.脑氧饱和度监测作为评估院内心肺复苏及心脏骤停后护理质量的实时监测工具
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 25;4(8):e001859. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001859.
7
Age, sex, and hospital factors are associated with the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalized patients who do not experience sustained return of spontaneous circulation.年龄、性别和医院因素与未实现自主循环持续恢复的住院患者的心肺复苏持续时间相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Dec;3(6):e001044. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001044.
8
Association between hospital rates of early Do-Not-Resuscitate orders and favorable neurological survival among survivors of inhospital cardiac arrest.住院心脏骤停幸存者中早期“不要复苏”医嘱的医院比例与良好神经功能存活之间的关联。
Am Heart J. 2017 Nov;193:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Hospital variation in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停后生存率的医院差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jan 31;3(1):e000400. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000400.
10
Association of Hospital-Level Acute Resuscitation and Postresuscitation Survival With Overall Risk-Standardized Survival to Discharge for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.医院层面的急救复苏和复苏后存活与院内心脏骤停患者总体风险标准化出院后存活率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010403. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10403.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-Time Predictors of Return of Spontaneous Circulation in an Emergency Setting: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.急诊环境下自主循环恢复的实时预测指标:一项五年回顾性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 29;15(17):2202. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172202.
2
Validation of CASPRI, GO-FAR, PIHCA scores in predicting favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest; A five-year three center retrospective study in IRAN.验证 CASPRI、GO-FAR、PIHCA 评分在预测院内心脏骤停后良好神经结局的价值:伊朗五年三中心回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04229-8.
3
An Advanced Cardiac Life Support Application Improves Performance during Simulated Cardiac Arrest.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital variation in survival after pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest.儿童住院期间心脏骤停后生存情况的医院差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jul;7(4):517-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000691.
2
Risk-standardizing survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons.风险校正院内心脏骤停的生存率,以促进医院间比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 13;62(7):601-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.051. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
3
Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停后生存率的变化趋势。
高级心脏生命支持应用程序提高模拟心脏骤停期间的表现。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):798-807. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788979. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
4
Machine Learning and Clinical Predictors of Mortality in Cardiac Arrest Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis.机器学习与心脏骤停患者死亡率的临床预测因素:全面分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Aug 10;30:e944408. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944408.
5
Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心肺复苏实时视听反馈设备能否改善患者预后?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
World J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):531-541. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i10.531.
6
Predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: CASPRI and GO-FAR scores.预测院内心搏骤停结局:CASPRI 和 GO-FAR 评分。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 23;13(1):18087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44312-2.
7
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in veno-venous-ECMO patients-A retrospective study on incidence, causes and outcome.静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合患者的心肺复苏——一项关于发生率、原因及结局的回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0290083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290083. eCollection 2023.
8
Prediction of Return of Spontaneous Circulation in a Pediatric Swine Model of Cardiac Arrest Using Low-Resolution Multimodal Physiological Waveforms.使用低分辨率多模态生理波形预测小儿心搏骤停模型中的自主循环恢复。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Oct;27(10):4719-4727. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3297927. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
9
Prognostic models for outcome prediction following in-hospital cardiac arrest using pre-arrest factors: a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal.基于停搏前因素的院内心搏骤停后结局预测预后模型:系统评价、荟萃分析和批判性评价。
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 20;27(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04306-y.
10
Tele-Rapid Response Team (Tele-RRT): The effect of implementing patient safety network system on outcomes of medical patients-A before and after cohort study.远程快速反应团队(Tele-RRT):实施患者安全网络系统对医疗患者结局的影响——一项前后队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0277992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277992. eCollection 2022.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1912-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109148.
4
Improving outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest: life after death.改善院内心脏骤停后的预后:起死回生。
JAMA. 2012 May 9;307(18):1917-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3504.
5
Racial differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停后生存情况的种族差异。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1195-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1340.
6
Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.用于健康结果公开报告的统计模型标准:美国心脏协会护理质量与结果研究跨学科写作小组的科学声明:由流行病学与预防委员会和中风委员会共同发起。美国心脏病学会基金会认可。
Circulation. 2006 Jan 24;113(3):456-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.170769. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
7
Massachusetts cardiac surgery report card: implications of statistical methodology.马萨诸塞州心脏手术报告卡:统计方法的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.078.
8
Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa).心脏骤停与心肺复苏结果报告:复苏登记Utstein模板的更新与简化:国际复苏联合委员会(美国心脏协会、欧洲复苏委员会、澳大利亚复苏委员会、新西兰复苏委员会、加拿大心脏与中风基金会、泛美心脏基金会、南部非洲复苏委员会)特别工作组为医疗专业人员发布的声明
Circulation. 2004 Nov 23;110(21):3385-97. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147236.85306.15.
9
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.医院内成人心肺复苏:来自国家心肺复苏注册中心的14720例心脏骤停报告。
Resuscitation. 2003 Sep;58(3):297-308. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00215-6.
10
Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling.改进医疗服务提供者概况分析的统计方法。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):764-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00065.