• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementing Decision Coaching for Lung Cancer Screening in the Low-Dose Computed Tomography Setting.实施低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查决策辅导。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Aug;16(8):e703-e725. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00453. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making COaching and navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.远程医疗共享决策辅导和初级保健导航(TELESCOPE)干预:通过患者导航员提供肺癌筛查共享决策的研究方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02610-2.
3
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making Coaching and Navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.远程医疗初级保健中的共同决策指导与导航(TELESCOPE)干预:一项关于患者导航员开展肺癌筛查共同决策的研究方案
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 22:rs.3.rs-4254047. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4254047/v1.
4
Primary Care Physician Perceptions of Shared Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening.基层医疗医生对肺癌筛查中共同决策的看法。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Aug;37(4):1099-1107. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01925-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening.评估肺癌筛查中的共同决策。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1311-1316. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3054.
6
How Health-Care Organizations Implement Shared Decision-making When It Is Required for Reimbursement: The Case of Lung Cancer Screening.医疗机构在需要报销的情况下实施共享决策的方式:以肺癌筛查为例。
Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):413-425. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.078. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs.共同决策对话与戒烟干预措施:低剂量CT肺癌筛查项目的关键组成部分。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun;7(3):254-271. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.05.10.
8
Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice.加速肺癌筛查背景下的烟草使用治疗整合:实施科学在实现政策和实践方面的相关性和应用。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac076.
9
Exploring shared decision-making needs in lung cancer screening among high-risk groups and health care providers in China: a qualitative study.探索中国肺癌筛查高危人群和医疗服务提供者的共同决策需求:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 21;24(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12360-0.
10
What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening.共享决策究竟是什么?一项关于肺癌筛查中共享决策的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):546-553. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05516-3. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the Design of and Emerging Evidence for Health Care Organization-Based Lung Cancer Screening Interventions: A Systematic Review.基于医疗保健机构的肺癌筛查干预措施的设计特点与新出现的证据:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Apr 25;10(1):23814683251328375. doi: 10.1177/23814683251328375. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making COaching and navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.远程医疗共享决策辅导和初级保健导航(TELESCOPE)干预:通过患者导航员提供肺癌筛查共享决策的研究方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02610-2.
3
The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Current challenges and future directions for shared decision making for lung cancer screening.美国癌症协会国家肺癌圆桌会议战略计划:肺癌筛查中共享决策的当前挑战和未来方向。
Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;130(23):3996-4011. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35382. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
Prediction of the stage shift growth of early-stage lung adenocarcinomas by volume-doubling time.通过体积倍增时间预测早期肺腺癌的分期转移生长
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jun 1;14(6):3983-3996. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1759. Epub 2024 May 24.
5
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making Coaching and Navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.远程医疗初级保健中的共同决策指导与导航(TELESCOPE)干预:一项关于患者导航员开展肺癌筛查共同决策的研究方案
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 22:rs.3.rs-4254047. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4254047/v1.
6
Implementing a Telehealth Shared Counseling and Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.在退伍军人事务医疗中心实施远程医疗共享咨询与决策访问以进行肺癌筛查
Fed Pract. 2023 Aug;40(Suppl 3):S83-S90. doi: 10.12788/fp.0403. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
A protocol for a cluster randomized trial of care delivery models to improve the quality of smoking cessation and shared decision making for lung cancer screening.一项关于改善戒烟质量和共同决策以促进肺癌筛查的护理提供模式的集群随机试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 May;128:107141. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107141. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
8
Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review.了解决策辅导如何以及在何种情况下对做出医疗保健决策的人起作用:一个现实主义的综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02007-0.
9
Outcomes of Shared Decision-Making for Low-Dose Screening for Lung Cancer in an Academic Medical Center.学术医疗中心低剂量肺癌筛查共同决策的结果
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):522-537. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02148-w. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
10
Development of an Implementation Strategy for Patient Decision Aids in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through Application of the Behavior Change Wheel.通过应用行为改变轮制定类风湿性关节炎患者决策辅助工具的实施策略
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021 May;3(5):312-323. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11250. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening.评估肺癌筛查中的共同决策。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1311-1316. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3054.
2
New recommendation and coverage of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: uptake has increased but is still low.肺癌筛查低剂量计算机断层扫描的新推荐与覆盖情况:接受度有所提高但仍较低。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3338-9.
3
A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care.一项在初级保健中测试肺癌筛查决策辅助工具的前后研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1.
4
Use of CT and Chest Radiography for Lung Cancer Screening Before and After Publication of Screening Guidelines: Intended and Unintended Uptake.筛查指南发布前后CT和胸部X线摄影在肺癌筛查中的应用:预期和非预期的使用情况
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):439-441. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9016.
5
POINT: Should Only Primary Care Physicians Provide Shared Decision-making Services to Discuss the Risks/Benefits of a Low-Dose Chest CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening? Yes.观点:是否应该仅由初级保健医生提供共同决策服务,以讨论低剂量胸部CT扫描用于肺癌筛查的风险/益处?是。
Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1213-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.057. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
6
Rebuttal From Dr Goodson.古德森博士的反驳。
Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1217-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.054. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Rebuttal From Dr Powell.鲍威尔博士的反驳。
Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1218-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.053. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
8
COUNTERPOINT: Should Only Primary Care Physicians Provide Shared Decision-making Services to Discuss the Risks/Benefits of a Low-Dose Chest CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening? No.反对观点:是否仅应由初级保健医生提供共同决策服务,以讨论低剂量胸部CT扫描用于肺癌筛查的风险/益处? 不。
Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1215-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.055. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
9
Responsiveness of a Brief Measure of Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge.一项简短的肺癌筛查知识测量方法的反应性。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):842-846. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1153-8.
10
Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit.肺癌筛查咨询与共同决策就诊的影响
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):572-578. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.027. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

实施低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查决策辅导。

Implementing Decision Coaching for Lung Cancer Screening in the Low-Dose Computed Tomography Setting.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Aug;16(8):e703-e725. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00453. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.19.00453
PMID:32208092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7427416/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The uptake of shared decision making (SDM) for lung cancer screening (LCS) as required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is suboptimal. Alternative models for delivering SDM are needed, such as decision coaching in the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Replicating Effective Programs framework guided our implementation of decision coaching, which included a patient-facilitated component before screening followed by in-person coaching that addressed the required elements for the SDM visit from CMS. We surveyed two LCS patient cohorts (pre-implementation and implementation of decision coaching) about their knowledge of LCS and perception of the SDM process. We conducted time-motion studies to assess the feasibility of implementing decision coaching and audio recorded clinical encounters from the implementation cohort to assess fidelity of the SDM conversation to the CMS requirements.

RESULTS

Compared with the pre-implementation cohort (n = 51), the implementation cohort (n = 30) had greater knowledge of LCS ( < .01) and reported a better SDM process ( = .01). Coaching took 7.6 ± 4.1 minutes and did not increase visit time ( = .72). Coaches addressed an average of 6.4 of 7 SDM elements required by CMS.

CONCLUSION

Decision coaching in the LDCT setting provides an opportunity for patients to confirm their screening decision by ensuring that patients are truly informed about the potential harms and benefits of LCS. The decision coaching had excellent fidelity in addressing the required SDM elements from CMS and is feasible.

摘要

目的

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)要求采用共享决策制定(SDM)对肺癌筛查(LCS)进行筛查,但这一要求并未得到充分落实。需要采用替代模型来提供 SDM,例如在低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)环境中进行决策辅导。

方法和材料

复制有效计划框架指导了我们的决策辅导实施,其中包括在筛查前进行患者辅助部分,然后进行面对面辅导,解决 CMS 对 SDM 访问的必要要素。我们对两个 LCS 患者队列(决策辅导实施前和实施后)进行了关于 LCS 知识和对 SDM 过程看法的调查。我们进行了时间-动作研究,以评估实施决策辅导的可行性,并从实施队列中录制临床访谈的音频,以评估 SDM 对话对 CMS 要求的保真度。

结果

与实施前队列(n = 51)相比,实施队列(n = 30)对 LCS 的了解更多(<0.01),并报告 SDM 过程更好(<0.01)。辅导需要 7.6 ± 4.1 分钟,不会增加就诊时间(=0.72)。教练平均解决了 CMS 要求的 7 个 SDM 要素中的 6.4 个。

结论

LDCT 环境中的决策辅导为患者提供了一个机会,通过确保患者真正了解 LCS 的潜在危害和益处,来确认他们的筛查决定。决策辅导在解决 CMS 要求的 SDM 要素方面具有很高的保真度,并且是可行的。