Billman George E
Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 10;11:200. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00200. eCollection 2020.
The grand challenge to physiology, as was first described in an essay published in the inaugural issue of Frontiers in Physiology in 2010, remains to integrate function from molecules to intact organisms. In order to make sense of the vast volume of information derived from, and increasingly dependent upon, reductionist approaches, a greater emphasis must be placed on the traditional integrated and more holistic approaches developed by the scientists who gave birth to physiology as an intellectual discipline. Our understanding of physiological regulation has evolved over time from the Greek idea of body humors, through Claude Bernard's "milieu intérieur," to Walter Cannon's formulation of the concept of "homeostasis" and the application of control theory (feedback and feedforward regulation) to explain how a constant internal environment is achieved. Homeostasis has become the central unifying concept of physiology and is defined as a self-regulating process by which an organism can maintain internal stability while adjusting to changing external conditions. Homeostasis is not static and unvarying; it is a dynamic process that can change internal conditions as required to survive external challenges. It is also important to note that homeostatic regulation is not merely the product of a single negative feedback cycle but reflects the complex interaction of multiple feedback systems that can be modified by higher control centers. This hierarchical control and feedback redundancy results in a finer level of control and a greater flexibility that enables the organism to adapt to changing environmental conditions. The health and vitality of the organism can be said to be the end result of homeostatic regulation. An understanding of normal physiology is not possible without an appreciation of this concept. Conversely, it follows that disruption of homeostatic mechanisms is what leads to disease, and effective therapy must be directed toward re-establishing these homeostatic conditions. Therefore, it is the purpose of this essay to describe the evolution of our understanding of homeostasis and the role of physiological regulation and dysregulation in health and disease.
生理学面临的重大挑战,正如2010年发表在《生理学前沿》创刊号一篇文章中首次所描述的那样,仍然是将从分子到完整生物体的功能整合起来。为了理解源自还原论方法并日益依赖于此的海量信息,必须更加重视由那些将生理学发展成为一门知识学科的科学家们所开创的传统综合且更具整体性的方法。我们对生理调节的理解随着时间推移不断演变,从希腊人关于体液的概念,到克劳德·贝尔纳的“内环境”,再到沃尔特·坎农提出的“稳态”概念以及应用控制理论(反馈和前馈调节)来解释如何实现恒定的内部环境。稳态已成为生理学的核心统一概念,被定义为一种自我调节过程,通过该过程生物体能够在适应不断变化的外部条件时维持内部稳定。稳态并非静态不变;它是一个动态过程,可以根据应对外部挑战的需要改变内部条件。同样重要的是要注意,稳态调节不仅仅是单个负反馈循环的产物,而是反映了多个反馈系统的复杂相互作用,这些系统可以被更高层次的控制中心修改。这种分级控制和反馈冗余导致了更精细的控制水平和更大的灵活性,使生物体能够适应不断变化的环境条件。可以说生物体的健康和活力是稳态调节的最终结果。如果不理解这个概念,就不可能理解正常生理学。相反,由此可见稳态机制的破坏会导致疾病,有效的治疗必须旨在重新建立这些稳态条件。因此,本文的目的是描述我们对稳态的理解的演变以及生理调节和调节异常在健康和疾病中的作用。