• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对10种标准听力图的助听器语音识别:英文版本

Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.

作者信息

Dörfler C, Hocke T, Hast A, Hoppe U

机构信息

Audiology Department and CI Centre CICERO Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, University Hospital Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Cochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

HNO. 2020 Aug;68(Suppl 2):93-99. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00843-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-020-00843-y
PMID:32211930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7403172/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvement of speech perception in quiet is an important goal of hearing aid provision. In practice, results are highly variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between type and extent of hearing loss (audiogram type), maximum word recognition score, and aided speech perception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pure tone and speech audiometric data of 740 ears in 370 patients were reviewed. All subjects visited our hearing center for hearing aid evaluation between 2012 and 2017. The maximum word recognition score (WRS) and the monosyllabic speech recognition score with hearing aids, WRS(HA) were analyzed for 10 different standard audiogram types.

RESULTS

The WRS(HA) with hearing aids for different degrees of hearing loss is, within error boundaries, comparable to previous investigations and shows a difference of 10-20 percentage points to the WRS. This difference tends to be larger for flat and moderately sloping audiograms compared to steep-sloping audiograms. The ratio WRS(HA)/WRS can be interpreted as an efficiency factor for hearing aid provision, since it relates speech recognition with hearing aids to the maximally achievable information carrying capacity of the hearing impaired.

CONCLUSION

The expectation regarding hearing aid provision has to be adjusted according to maximum word recognition score, the derived quality measures, degree of hearing loss, and audiogram type.

摘要

背景

改善安静环境下的言语感知是助听器验配的一个重要目标。在实际应用中,结果差异很大。本研究的目的是调查听力损失的类型和程度(听力图类型)、最大言语识别得分与助听后言语感知之间的关系。

材料与方法

回顾了370例患者740只耳的纯音听力和言语测听数据。所有受试者在2012年至2017年间到我们的听力中心进行助听器评估。分析了10种不同标准听力图类型的最大言语识别得分(WRS)和佩戴助听器后的单音节言语识别得分WRS(HA)。

结果

不同程度听力损失佩戴助听器后的WRS(HA),在误差范围内,与先前的研究结果相当,与WRS相差10 - 20个百分点。与陡降型听力图相比,平坦型和中度斜坡型听力图的这种差异往往更大。WRS(HA)/WRS的比值可解释为助听器验配的效率因子,因为它将佩戴助听器后的言语识别与听力受损者可达到的最大信息承载能力联系起来。

结论

关于助听器验配的期望必须根据最大言语识别得分、导出的质量指标、听力损失程度和听力图类型进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/20f9a5df8684/106_2020_843_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/853e67244002/106_2020_843_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/db8acd227512/106_2020_843_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/be4509edc92c/106_2020_843_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/20f9a5df8684/106_2020_843_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/853e67244002/106_2020_843_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/db8acd227512/106_2020_843_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/be4509edc92c/106_2020_843_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f1/7403172/20f9a5df8684/106_2020_843_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.针对10种标准听力图的助听器语音识别:英文版本
HNO. 2020 Aug;68(Suppl 2):93-99. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00843-y.
2
[Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].[针对10种标准听力图的助听器语音识别]
HNO. 2020 Jan;68(1):40-47. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-00780-5.
3
[Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].[为重度听力损失患者提供助听器的有效性]
HNO. 2022 Jul;70(7):520-532. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01139-5. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Role of cochlear reserve in adults with cochlear implants following post-lingual hearing loss.语后聋成人人工耳蜗植入后耳蜗储备功能的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar;280(3):1063-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07558-6. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.在平坦型听力图的年龄相关性听力损失中,放大对无助听言语辨别能力的益处。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023 Feb;50(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 25.
6
Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.不同年龄段助听器使用者的言语感知与信息承载能力
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21 Suppl 1:16-20. doi: 10.1159/000448349. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
[The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].[言语测听法评估助听器益处中的年龄效应]
HNO. 2016 Mar;64(3):143-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0115-5.
8
Cochlear Implantation in Candidates With Moderate-to-Severe Hearing Loss and Poor Speech Perception.中度至重度听力损失和言语感知能力差的患者行人工耳蜗植入。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):E940-E945. doi: 10.1002/lary.28771. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
[Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].[与纯音听力损失相比,使用助听器时的言语感知]
HNO. 2014 Jun;62(6):443-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2813-1.
10
Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.通过人工耳蜗和传统助听器进行双耳刺激所带来的双耳听力优势:一项为期6个月的对比研究。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Jun;125(6):596-606. doi: 10.1080/00016480510027493.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Hearing Aid Outcomes Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测助听器效果
Audiol Neurootol. 2025 Feb 3:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000543916.
2
Prevalence and Characteristics of Veterans with Severe Hearing Loss: A Descriptive Study.重度听力损失退伍军人的患病率及特征:一项描述性研究。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241273393. doi: 10.1177/23312165241273393.
3
Accuracy and Consistency of Confidence Limits for Monosyllable Identification Scores Derived Using Simulation, the Harrell-Davis Estimator, and Nonlinear Quantile Regression.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.有源中耳听力植入设备的最低报告标准。
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(2):105-115. doi: 10.1159/000490878. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
2
[Investigation of the quality of hearing aid provision in seniors considering cognitive functions].[考虑认知功能的老年人助听器佩戴质量调查]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2018 Dec;97(12):852-859. doi: 10.1055/a-0671-2295. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
3
Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implants Lead to an Improved Speech Perception Gap Compared to Conventional Hearing Aid.
使用模拟、哈雷尔-戴维斯估计器和非线性分位数回归得出的单音节识别分数置信区间的准确性和一致性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(13):1397. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131397.
4
Outcome Prediction of Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise for Cochlear Implant Candidates Based on Pre-Operative Measures.基于术前测量对人工耳蜗植入候选者安静和噪声环境下言语感知的结果预测
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 8;13(4):994. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040994.
5
Tone Decay Reconsidered: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study in Hearing-Aid Users with Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss.重新审视音调衰减:对中重度听力损失助听器使用者的前瞻性研究初步结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):500. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020500.
6
Evolving a Model for Cochlear Implant Outcome.构建人工耳蜗植入效果模型
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 26;12(19):6215. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196215.
7
Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.使用助听器的效果受人口统计学、听力学和助听器相关变量的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Aug;279(8):3857-3865. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07126-4. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
直接声电刺激耳蜗植入相较于传统助听器可改善言语感知差距。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Oct;39(9):1147-1152. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001954.
4
Earphone and Aided Word Recognition Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates.人工耳蜗植入候选人的耳机和辅助单词识别差异。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Aug;39(7):e543-e549. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001873.
5
Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?为什么助听器无法恢复正常听觉?
Trends Neurosci. 2018 Apr;41(4):174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
[Basic knowledge on the efficacy of hearing aids depending on the type of hearing impairment for Ear, Nose & Throat specialists].[针对耳鼻喉科专家的、关于根据听力障碍类型划分的助听器功效的基础知识]
HNO. 2018 Feb;66(2):122-127. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0457-2.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Apr;96(S 01):S43-S65. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120046. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
[Speech audiometric outcome parameters in clinical trials on hearing improvement].[听力改善临床试验中的言语听力测定结果参数]
HNO. 2017 Mar;65(3):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0298-4.
9
Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.不同年龄段助听器使用者的言语感知与信息承载能力
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21 Suppl 1:16-20. doi: 10.1159/000448349. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
10
Clinical Implications of Word Recognition Differences in Earphone and Aided Conditions.耳机与助听条件下单词识别差异的临床意义
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1475-1481. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001205.