NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London United Kingdom.
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e013684. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013684. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
Background Patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) often undergo a blood test to measure troponin, but interpretation of the result is impeded by uncertainty about its clinical importance. We investigated the relationship between troponin level, coronary angiography, and all-cause mortality in real-world patients presenting with AF. Methods and Results We used National Institute of Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative data to identify patients admitted between 2010 and 2017 at 5 tertiary centers in the United Kingdom with a primary diagnosis of AF. Peak troponin results were scaled as multiples of the upper limit of normal. A total of 3121 patients were included in the analysis. Over a median follow-up of 1462 (interquartile range, 929-1975) days, there were 586 deaths (18.8%). The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality associated with a positive troponin (value above upper limit of normal) was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.01-1.43; <0.05). Higher troponin levels were associated with higher risk of mortality, reaching a maximum hazard ratio of 2.6 (95% CI, 1.9-3.4) at ≈250 multiples of the upper limit of normal. There was an exponential relationship between higher troponin levels and increased odds of coronary angiography. The mortality risk was 36% lower in patients undergoing coronary angiography than in those who did not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89; =0.01). Conclusions Increased troponin was associated with increased risk of mortality in patients presenting with AF. The lower hazard ratio in patients undergoing invasive management raises the possibility that the clinical importance of troponin release in AF may be mediated by coronary artery disease, which may be responsive to revascularization.
患有心房颤动(AF)的患者通常会进行血液检查以测量肌钙蛋白,但由于其临床重要性不确定,因此对检测结果的解释受到阻碍。我们研究了在真实世界中患有 AF 的患者中,肌钙蛋白水平与冠状动脉造影术和全因死亡率之间的关系。
我们使用国家卫生研究院健康信息学合作数据,确定了 2010 年至 2017 年期间在英国 5 个三级中心因原发性 AF 入院的患者。将峰值肌钙蛋白结果按正常值上限的倍数进行缩放。共有 3121 例患者纳入分析。在中位数为 1462 天(四分位距 929-1975)的随访期间,有 586 例患者死亡(18.8%)。与肌钙蛋白阳性(正常值上限以上)相关的死亡调整后的危险比为 1.20(95%可信区间,1.01-1.43;<0.05)。肌钙蛋白水平越高,死亡风险越高,在 ≈250 倍正常值上限时,死亡风险达到最高危险比 2.6(95%可信区间,1.9-3.4)。较高的肌钙蛋白水平与接受冠状动脉造影术的几率增加呈指数关系。与未接受冠状动脉造影术的患者相比,接受冠状动脉造影术的患者的死亡率降低了 36%(调整后的危险比,0.61;95%可信区间,0.42-0.89;=0.01)。
在患有 AF 的患者中,肌钙蛋白升高与死亡率增加相关。接受有创性治疗的患者的危险比较低,提示 AF 中肌钙蛋白释放的临床重要性可能通过对血管重建有反应的冠状动脉疾病介导。