Suppr超能文献

牙龈表型及其与年龄、性别和其他危险因素的关系。

Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical sciences, Civilization University, Sana'a, Yemen.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01073-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Careful consideration and assessment of the type of phenotype has gained a fundamental importance in the treatment planning for any patient. We evaluated the prevalence of gingival phenotypes in a sample of Yemeni population and to explore its relationships to gender, age and other risk factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed among 456 patients. All maxillary anterior teeth were included for all parameters and 1st molars were included for gingival thickness measurements. All patients included in this study were systemically healthy and presented no dental crowding. Four clinical parameters were systematically recorded: Gingival thickness (GT), Width of keratinized gingiva (WKG), Crown width/ crown length (CW/CL) ratio and Papilla height (PH). Scores obtained from different parameters measurements were recorded and analyzed using non-parametric tests where P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. One examiner performed all measurements.

RESULTS

The mean age was 29.9 ± 8.26 years. Of 456 recruited subjects, 83 (18.2%) subjects had thin, 69 (15.1%) had thick GT and 304 (66.7%) were placed in non-categorized (1.5-2 mm) GT. Square crown shape was found in 210 (44.1%) patients and 245 patients (55.9%) showed rectangular shape. Regarding WKG, 114 (25%) patients had width < 4 mm, 319 (70%) had width 4.1-8 mm and 23 (5%) patients had width >  8 mm. There was no significant difference between males and females for GT measurements. Regarding WKG, results showed that the prevalence of WKG 4.1-8 mm was more among females while males had more prevalence of ≤4 mm with significance difference. PH showed no significant differences between males and females. Regarding age, there was no significant differences between patients ≤25 years and >  25 years for all gingival parameters measurements. The relationship of smoking with different gingival parameters also showed no significant differences between smokers and non-smokers. Similarly, relationship of khat chewing with different gingival parameters showed no significant difference. Regarding inter-relationship between parameters, thin GT was associated with rectangular tooth form while square and quadrate forms are more associated with "1.5-2 mm" GT. WKG of ≤4 mm was associated with rectangular tooth form while WKG >  8 was more associated with square and quadrate forms with no significant difference. Results showed significant association between thin GT with 4.1-8 mm WKG.

CONCLUSION

Yemeni population had more prevalence of "1.5-2 mm" GT, rectangular crown shape and WKG from 4.1-8 mm. Regarding interrelationship between gingival parameters, GT showed obvious relationship with WKG, CW/CL ratio and PH. WKG with CW/CL also showed significant relationship while no relationship was shown between other gingival phenotype parameters.

摘要

背景

在为任何患者制定治疗计划时,仔细考虑和评估表型类型已经变得至关重要。我们评估了也门人群样本中牙龈表型的流行情况,并探讨了其与性别、年龄和其他风险因素的关系。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入了 456 名患者。所有上颌前牙均纳入所有参数,第一磨牙纳入牙龈厚度测量。纳入本研究的所有患者均身体健康,无牙列拥挤。系统记录了四个临床参数:牙龈厚度(GT)、角化牙龈宽度(WKG)、冠宽/冠长(CW/CL)比值和龈乳头高度(PH)。记录不同参数测量获得的评分,并使用非参数检验进行分析,其中 P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。一位检查者进行了所有测量。

结果

平均年龄为 29.9±8.26 岁。在 456 名招募的受试者中,83 名(18.2%)受试者的 GT 较薄,69 名(15.1%)受试者的 GT 较厚,304 名(66.7%)受试者的 GT 未分类(1.5-2mm)。210 名(44.1%)患者表现为方形冠形,245 名(55.9%)患者表现为矩形冠形。关于 WKG,114 名(25%)患者的宽度<4mm,319 名(70%)患者的宽度为 4.1-8mm,23 名(5%)患者的宽度>8mm。GT 测量中男女之间无显著性差异。关于 WKG,结果表明,女性中 4.1-8mm 的 WKG 更为常见,而男性中≤4mm 的 WKG 更为常见,差异具有统计学意义。PH 显示男女之间无显著性差异。关于年龄,≤25 岁和>25 岁的患者在所有牙龈参数测量中均无显著性差异。吸烟与不同牙龈参数的关系在吸烟者和非吸烟者之间也无显著性差异。同样,阿拉伯茶咀嚼与不同牙龈参数的关系也无显著性差异。关于参数之间的相互关系,薄 GT 与矩形牙形有关,而方形和四边形与“1.5-2mm”GT 有关。WKG≤4mm 与矩形牙形有关,而 WKG>8mm 与方形和四边形有关,无显著性差异。结果表明,薄 GT 与 4.1-8mm 的 WKG 之间存在显著关联。

结论

也门人群中“1.5-2mm”GT、矩形冠形和 4.1-8mm 的 WKG 更为常见。关于牙龈参数之间的相互关系,GT 与 WKG、CW/CL 比值和 PH 有明显关系。WKG 与 CW/CL 也有显著关系,而其他牙龈表型参数之间没有关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fe/7093957/919df4204d5b/12903_2020_1073_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

5
Analysis of Crown Morphology and Gingival Shape in the Maxillary Anterior Dentition.上颌前牙区牙冠形态与牙龈形态分析
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Nov/Dec;40(6):925-931. doi: 10.11607/prd.4696.
6
Gingival profiles in a select Asian cohort: A pilot study.特定亚洲人群的牙龈形态:一项试点研究。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Feb;9(1). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12269. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Factors associated with the appearance of gingival papillae.与牙龈乳头出现相关的因素。
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):719-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01594.x. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians.由有经验和无经验的临床医生评估的牙龈生物型。
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Nov;36(11):958-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01479.x. Epub 2009 Oct 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验