• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化扫描牙冠修复时评估牙龈移位对牙周健康的影响:为期 1 年的临床随访。

Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Aug;36(6):1323-1335. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03266-5. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-021-03266-5
PMID:33566189
Abstract

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the effects of the gingival displacement techniques of retraction cord, cordless paste system, and Er,Cr:YSGG laser troughing on the periodontal tissues around the crown restoration produced using a digital scan. This was analyzed by recording the probing depth (PD), plaque index, gingival index (GI), mobility, sensitivity, and bleeding on probing (BOP) index. This study included 60 mandibular 1 molars from 52 participants (20 males and 32 females) requiring crown restoration. The margin lines of the crown preparations were placed 1 mm subgingivally. Based on the gingival displacement technique used, the patients were divided into three groups: retraction cord, cordless paste system, and Er,Cr:YSGG laser troughing. A digital scan of the prepared tooth was performed. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at five different times: 1 day, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year. Six periodontal indices were used to assess the periodontal health. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables depending on the groups. There was a significant difference in the PD, GI, and BOP index scores among the three techniques during the 1-year clinical monitoring (p < 0.001). The PD in the three zones of the buccal surface showed a significant increase with time in the retraction cord and cordless paste system groups (p < 0.001). The highest GI scores were observed in the retraction cord group on the 1 day. The Er,Cr:YSGG laser troughing procedure produced lower PD, GI, and BOP index scores as compared to the retraction cord and cordless paste system procedures in the 1-year period.

摘要

本临床研究的目的是比较牙龈移位技术(橡皮障、无绳膏系统和 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光沟)对数字化扫描牙冠修复周围牙周组织的影响。通过记录探诊深度(PD)、菌斑指数、牙龈指数(GI)、松动度、敏感度和探诊出血(BOP)指数来进行分析。本研究纳入了 60 颗来自 52 名患者(20 名男性和 32 名女性)的下颌第一磨牙,这些患者需要进行牙冠修复。牙冠制备的边缘线位于龈下 1mm 处。根据使用的牙龈移位技术,患者被分为三组:橡皮障、无绳膏系统和 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光沟。对预备好的牙齿进行数字化扫描。预约随访时间为五个不同时间点:第 1 天、第 1 个月、第 3 个月、第 6 个月和第 1 年。使用六个牙周指数评估牙周健康状况。根据组间差异,采用卡方检验比较分类变量。在为期 1 年的临床监测中,三种技术的 PD、GI 和 BOP 指数得分存在显著差异(p<0.001)。在橡皮障和无绳膏系统组中,颊面三个区域的 PD 在整个 1 年内随时间显著增加(p<0.001)。在第 1 天,橡皮障组的 GI 评分最高。与橡皮障和无绳膏系统组相比,在 1 年内,Er,Cr:YSGG 激光沟技术产生的 PD、GI 和 BOP 指数得分较低。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.数字化扫描牙冠修复时评估牙龈移位对牙周健康的影响:为期 1 年的临床随访。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Aug;36(6):1323-1335. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03266-5. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.牙龈排龈线和无排龈线系统对龈沟封闭、移位及炎症的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
3
A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.一项比较使用移位线和氯化铝糊的随机对照临床试验。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jun;32(4):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12581. Epub 2020 May 22.
4
Comparison of four cordless gingival displacement systems: A clinical study.四种无绳牙龈移位系统的比较:一项临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Clinical and Immunological Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser in Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光在非手术牙周治疗中的临床和免疫效果:一项随机临床试验。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 May;38(5):316-322. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4748.
6
A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.传统与手术性牙龈移位术后牙龈高度退缩变化的比较分析:旋转刮治术、二极管激光及铒激光制备龈沟。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;11(16):2262. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162262.
7
The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: a pilot study.牙龈退缩术对牙周指数及龈沟液细胞因子水平的影响:一项初步研究。
J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):108-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00083.x.
8
Evaluation of the clinical and biochemical efficacy of erbium, chromium:ytrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (ER,CR:YSGG) laser treatment in periodontitis.评估铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光治疗牙周炎的临床和生化疗效。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Sep;35(7):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-02990-8. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙龈收缩膏与龈线对牙周健康的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3):234-244. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41976.
10
A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health.一项关于无线和传统牵拉技术对牙龈及牙周健康影响的临床研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Dec;35(12):1053-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01335.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement and clinical efficacy using polyvinyl siloxane foam and retraction cord systems: A randomized controlled in vivo study.使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷泡沫和缩龈线系统对牙龈移位和临床疗效的比较评估:一项随机对照体内研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):1103-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.07.016. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
2
Comparative Analysis of Periodontal Parameters and Patient Satisfaction Utilising Different Temporary Crown Fabrication Techniques: A Parallel-Group Randomised Controlled Trial.使用不同临时冠制作技术的牙周参数与患者满意度的比较分析:一项平行组随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Mar 26;16(3):e56977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56977. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors.牙龈表型及其与年龄、性别和其他危险因素的关系。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01073-y.
2
Patients' perception of their oral and periodontal health and its impact: a cross-sectional study in the NHS.患者对口腔和牙周健康的感知及其影响:NHS 的横断面研究。
Br Dent J. 2019 Oct;227(7):587-593. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0721-9.
3
Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy and laser irradiation as an adjunct to open flap debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study.
比较浸提式收缩线与激光对龈下边缘收缩后牙龈附着水平和疼痛感知的影响:一项前瞻性、分口、对照、临床研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):136-143. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_437_23. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.传统与手术性牙龈移位术后牙龈高度退缩变化的比较分析:旋转刮治术、二极管激光及铒激光制备龈沟。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;11(16):2262. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162262.
光动力疗法和激光照射辅助开放式清创术治疗慢性牙周炎的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2020 Jan;36(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12499. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.使用新型牙龈沟模型比较牙龈退缩材料。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Aug;28(7):784-789. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13093. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙龈收缩膏与龈线对牙周健康的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3):234-244. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41976.
6
Comparison of four cordless gingival displacement systems: A clinical study.四种无绳牙龈移位系统的比较:一项临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Impression of Subgingival Dental Preparation Can Be Taken with Ultrasound.可以使用超声获取龈下牙体预备的印模。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Feb;45(2):558-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.使用二极管激光或排龈线进行牙龈移位:一项对比临床研究。
Am J Dent. 2018 Jun;31(3):131-134.
9
Comparison of Gingival Troughing by Laser and Retraction Cord.激光与缩龈线牙龈沟加深效果的比较
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(4):527-532. doi: 10.11607/prd.3551.
10
Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.牙科中的口内扫描仪:当前文献综述
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.