Kus-Bartoszek Agnieszka, Lipski Mariusz, Jarząbek Anna, Manowiec Joanna, Marek Ewa, Droździk Agnieszka
Laboratory of Paediatric Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Powstancow Wlkp 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Department of Preclinical Conservative Dentistry and Preclinical Endodontics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Powstancow Wlkp 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 11;12(18):5897. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185897.
Gingival phenotype (GP) is determined based on the thickness and width of the gingival tissue. An evaluation of GP is essential for adequate treatment planning and outcome monitoring, including orthodontic treatments in a paediatric population. The present study aimed to compare the reliability of the visual and TRAN methods with that of the ultrasound biometer measurements in the early transitional dentition phase. One hundred ninety three generally healthy, 7-year-old children were examined. An assessment of GP was performed by a paedodontist and a periodontist. The average thickness of the gingiva was 0.76 ± 0.36 mm, which was classified as a thin GP. The agreement between a visual assessment and the biometric ultrasound measurements reached the highest (94%) level when assessing a very thin GP (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.37, < 0.01). Similarly, 99% agreement in the diagnosis of a thin GP was recorded for the TRAN and ultrasound methods (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.49, < 0.001). In total, 86% of cases diagnosed as having a thick GP using the TRAN method turned out to be thin according to the ultrasound measurements. The dentist's specialization and professional experience in the assessment of GP were irrelevant (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.49, < 0.001). All methods tested in the present study were proven to be easy to perform and well accepted by the children. The visual assessment and TRAN methods, despite the fact that they enabled the diagnosis of a thin GP (crucial for treatment planning), cannot be recommended during the teeth replacement period. A misdiagnosis of thick GP may deprive a young at-risk patient of special supervision, which may develop into mucogingival deformities. A biometric ultrasound, although expensive, allows for reliable assessment of the gingiva thickness when needed.
牙龈表型(GP)是根据牙龈组织的厚度和宽度来确定的。对GP进行评估对于制定适当的治疗计划和监测治疗结果至关重要,包括儿科人群的正畸治疗。本研究旨在比较视觉和TRAN方法与超声生物测量仪测量在乳牙列早期过渡阶段的可靠性。对193名一般健康的7岁儿童进行了检查。由儿童牙医和牙周病医生对GP进行评估。牙龈的平均厚度为0.76±0.36毫米,被归类为薄型GP。在评估极薄型GP时,视觉评估与生物测量超声测量之间的一致性达到最高水平(94%)(Spearman等级相关系数r = 0.37,P < 0.01)。同样,TRAN方法和超声方法在诊断薄型GP方面的一致性记录为99%(Spearman等级相关系数r = 0.49,P < 0.001)。根据TRAN方法诊断为厚型GP的病例中,总计86%经超声测量结果显示为薄型。牙医在GP评估方面的专业领域和专业经验并无关联(Spearman等级相关系数r = 0.49,P < 0.001)。本研究中测试的所有方法都被证明易于实施且儿童接受度良好。视觉评估和TRAN方法尽管能够诊断薄型GP(这对治疗计划至关重要),但在换牙期不建议使用。厚型GP的误诊可能会使年轻的高危患者得不到特殊监护,进而可能发展为膜龈畸形。生物测量超声虽然昂贵,但在需要时能够可靠地评估牙龈厚度。