• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子医疗记录进行结直肠癌筛查转诊决策和风险预测模型的开发。

The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development.

机构信息

Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01206-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-020-01206-1
PMID:32213167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7093989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The database used for the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) derives participant information from primary care records. Combining predictors with FOBTs has shown to improve referral decisions and accuracy. The richer data available from GP databases could be used to complement screening referral decisions by identifying those at greatest risk of colorectal cancer. We determined the availability of data for key predictors and whether this information could be used to inform more accurate screening referral decisions.

METHODS

An English BCSP cohort was derived using the electronic notifications received from the BCSP database to GP records. The cohort covered a period between 13th May 2009 to 17th January 2017. Completeness of variables and univariable associations were assessed. Risk prediction models were developed using Cox regression and multivariable fractional polynomials with backwards elimination. Optimism adjusted performance metrics were reported. The sensitivity and specificity of a combined approach using the negative FOBT model plus FOBT positive patients was determined using a probability equivalent to a 3% PPV NICE guidelines level.

RESULTS

292,059 participants aged 60-74 were derived for the BCSP screening cohort. A model including the screening test result had a C-statistic of 0.860, c-slope of 0.997, and R of 0.597. A model developed for negative screening results only had a C-statistic of 0.597, c-slope of 0.940, and R of 0.062. Risk predictors included in the models included; age, sex, alcohol consumption, IBS diagnosis, family history of gastrointestinal cancer, smoking status, previous negatives and whether a GP had ordered a blood test. For the combined screening approach, sensitivity increased slightly from 53.90% (FOBT only) to 58.82% but at the expense of an increased referral rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This research has identified several potential predictors for CRC in a BCSP population. A risk prediction model developed for BCSP FOBT negative patients was not clinically useful due to a low sensitivity and increased referral rate. The predictors identified in this study should be investigated in a refined algorithm combining the quantitative FIT result. Combining data from multiple sources enables fuller patient profiles using the primary care and screening database interface.

摘要

背景

英国国民保健制度(NHS)肠癌筛查计划(BCSP)使用的数据库源自初级保健记录中的参与者信息。将预测因素与粪便潜血试验(FOBT)相结合已被证明可以改善转诊决策和准确性。GP 数据库中提供的更丰富的数据可用于通过识别结直肠癌风险最大的人群来补充筛查转诊决策。我们确定了关键预测因素的数据可用性,以及这些信息是否可用于做出更准确的筛查转诊决策。

方法

使用从 BCSP 数据库发送至 GP 记录的电子通知,在英格兰创建了一个 BCSP 队列。该队列涵盖了 2009 年 5 月 13 日至 2017 年 1 月 17 日期间的内容。评估了变量的完整性和单变量关联。使用 Cox 回归和向后消除的多变量分数多项式建立了风险预测模型。报告了经过乐观调整的性能指标。使用与 NICE 指南 3%阳性预测值(PPV)水平相当的概率确定了使用阴性 FOBT 模型加 FOBT 阳性患者的联合方法的灵敏度和特异性。

结果

从 BCSP 筛查队列中获得了 292,059 名年龄在 60-74 岁的参与者。包含筛查测试结果的模型的 C 统计量为 0.860,c-斜率为 0.997,R 为 0.597。仅为阴性筛查结果开发的模型的 C 统计量为 0.597,c-斜率为 0.940,R 为 0.062。纳入模型的风险预测因素包括:年龄、性别、饮酒量、IBS 诊断、胃肠道癌症家族史、吸烟状况、既往阴性结果以及 GP 是否进行了血液检查。对于联合筛查方法,灵敏度从仅使用 FOBT 的 53.90%略有增加至 58.82%,但转诊率也有所增加。

结论

本研究在 BCSP 人群中确定了几个结直肠癌的潜在预测因素。为 BCSP FOBT 阴性患者开发的风险预测模型由于灵敏度低和转诊率增加而没有临床意义。应在结合定量 FIT 结果的细化算法中进一步研究本研究中确定的预测因素。从多个来源合并数据可以使用初级保健和筛查数据库接口来构建更完整的患者资料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/190cef944dd3/12876_2020_1206_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/a31f0cc73b60/12876_2020_1206_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/2c220d6c7c3c/12876_2020_1206_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/190cef944dd3/12876_2020_1206_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/a31f0cc73b60/12876_2020_1206_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/2c220d6c7c3c/12876_2020_1206_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/7093989/190cef944dd3/12876_2020_1206_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development.利用电子医疗记录进行结直肠癌筛查转诊决策和风险预测模型的开发。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01206-1.
2
Inappropriate use of the faecal occult blood test outside of the National Health Service colorectal cancer screening programme.在国民保健制度大肠癌筛查计划之外不当使用粪便潜血试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov;24(11):1270-5. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328357cd9e.
3
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach.人口健康推广时代初级保健就诊与结直肠癌筛查结果之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
4
Factors associated with completion of bowel cancer screening and the potential effects of simplifying the screening test algorithm.与完成肠癌筛查相关的因素以及简化筛查测试算法的潜在影响。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Feb 2;114(3):327-33. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.469. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
5
Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.基于粪便潜血检测(FOBT)的结直肠癌筛查趋势及未使用的预测因素:南澳大利亚地区的研究结果及对提高FOBT接受率的启示
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):45-52. doi: 10.1071/AH16126.
6
Options for screening for colorectal cancer in the Royal Air Force: a cost-effectiveness evaluation.英国皇家空军中结直肠癌筛查的选项:一项成本效益评估。
J R Army Med Corps. 1995 Oct;141(3):142-50. doi: 10.1136/jramc-141-03-04.
7
Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.患者、医生及环境因素对结直肠癌筛查异常结果结肠镜随访中人口统计学及健康差异的影响。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3502-3512. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30765. Epub 2017 May 11.
8
Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: a Multi-Center Pre-Clinical Case Cohort Study for Validation of a Combined DNA Stool Test.结直肠癌的早期检测:一项用于验证联合DNA粪便检测的多中心临床前病例队列研究
Clin Lab. 2018 Oct 1;64(10):1719-1730. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180521.
9
Impact of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program on local health services demand in Italy: a 7-year survey in a northern province.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划对意大利当地卫生服务需求的影响:在北部一个省的 7 年调查。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov;106(11):1986-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.185. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
10
The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.CT 结肠成像用于结直肠癌筛查对英国国民保健制度的影响:成本、医疗资源和健康结果。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(1):51-64. doi: 10.2165/11588110-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Stratified/risk-based screening for colorectal cancer in the UK: an overview.英国基于风险分层的结直肠癌筛查概述
Colorectal Cancer. 2025 May 20;14(1):2501851. doi: 10.1080/1758194X.2025.2501851. eCollection 2025.
2
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Risk Prediction Model for Esophageal Cancer Among General Population: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Our data, our society, our health: A vision for inclusive and transparent health data science in the United Kingdom and beyond.我们的数据,我们的社会,我们的健康:英国及其他地区包容性和透明性健康数据科学愿景。
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Mar 25;3(3):e10191. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10191. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Towards risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening. Adding risk factors to the fecal immunochemical test: Evidence, evolution and expectations.迈向风险分层结直肠癌筛查。粪便免疫化学检测中加入风险因素:证据、演变和期望。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
3
Population-calibrated multiple imputation for a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models.
一般人群食管癌风险预测模型:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;9:680967. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680967. eCollection 2021.
4
Individualized faecal immunochemical test cut-off based on age and sex in colorectal cancer screening.基于年龄和性别的个性化粪便免疫化学检测临界值在结直肠癌筛查中的应用
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jun 9;23:101447. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101447. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
A diagnostic prediction model for colorectal cancer in elderlies via internet of medical things.一种通过医疗物联网构建的老年人大肠癌诊断预测模型。
Int J Inf Technol. 2021;13(4):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s41870-021-00663-5. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Correlation between immunity from BCG and the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19.卡介苗诱导的免疫力与新冠病毒病的发病率和死亡率之间的相关性
Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2020 Aug 28;6:17. doi: 10.1186/s40794-020-00117-z. eCollection 2020.
对分类回归模型中二项式/分类协变量进行人群校准的多重插补。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):792-808. doi: 10.1002/sim.8004. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
A large proportion of fecal immunochemical test-positive participants in colorectal cancer screening is symptomatic.在结直肠癌筛查中,很大一部分粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性的参与者有症状。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Apr;6(3):471-479. doi: 10.1177/2050640617733922. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
5
Predicting the risk for colorectal cancer with personal characteristics and fecal immunochemical test.利用个人特征和粪便免疫化学检测预测结直肠癌风险。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(18):e0529. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010529.
6
Fecal immunochemical tests in combination with blood tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma detection-systematic review.粪便免疫化学检测联合血液检测用于结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤检测的系统评价
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Feb;6(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/2050640617737004. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
A combination of clinical risk stratification and fecal immunochemical test is useful for identifying persons with high priority of early colonoscopy.联合临床风险分层和粪便免疫化学检测有助于识别具有早期结肠镜检查高优先级的人群。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Mar;50(3):254-259. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Risk-adjusted colorectal cancer screening using the FIT and routine screening data: development of a risk prediction model.基于 FIT 和常规筛查数据的风险调整结直肠癌筛查:风险预测模型的建立。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(2):285-293. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.375. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records.结直肠癌预测模型评估:250 万患者病历回顾性分析。
Cancer Med. 2017 Oct;6(10):2453-2460. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1183. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update.2016 年全球结直肠癌人群筛查计划:更新。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 28;23(20):3632-3642. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632.