• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更新后的 EORTC 肺癌患者生活质量评估模块(QLQ-LC29)的心理测量学特性:一项国际性、观察性现场研究。

Psychometric properties of the updated EORTC module for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer (QLQ-LC29): an international, observational field study.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Palliative Care, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):723-732. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30093-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30093-0
PMID:32213338
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) assesses quality of life (QOL) in patients with lung cancer and was the first EORTC module developed for use in international clinical trials. Since its publication in 1994, major treatment advances with possible effects on QOL have occurred. These changes called for an update of the module and its international psychometric validation. We aimed to investigate the scale structure and psychometric properties of the updated lung cancer module, QLQ-LC29, in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

This international, observational field study was done in 19 hospitals across 12 countries. Patients aged older than 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer and no other previous primary tumour, and who were mentally fit with sufficient language skills to understand and complete the questionnaire were included. Patients were asked during a hospital visit to fill in the paper versions of the core questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 plus QLQ-LC29, and investigators selected half of these patients to complete the questionnaire again 2-4 weeks later. Our primary aim was to assess the scale structure and psychometric properties of EORTC QLQ-LC29. We analysed scale structure using confirmatory factor analysis; reliability using Cronbach's α value (internal consistency) and intra-class coefficient (test-retest reliability); sensitivity using independent t tests stratified by Karnofsky performance status; and responsiveness to change over time by ANOVA. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02745691.

FINDINGS

Between April 12, 2016, and Sept 26, 2018, 523 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of either non-small-cell lung cancer (n=442) or small-cell lung cancer (n=81) were recruited. Confirmatory factor analysis provided a solution composed of five multi-item scales (coughing, shortness of breath, fear of progression, hair problems, and surgery-related symptoms) plus 15 single symptom or side-effect items: χ=370·233, root mean square error of approximation=0·075, and comparative-fit index=0·901. Cronbach's α for internal consistencies of all multi-item scales were above the threshold of 0·70. Intra-class coefficients for test-retest reliabilities ranged between 0·82 and 0·97. Three (shortness of breath, fear of progression, and hair problems) of the five multi-item scales showed responsiveness to change over time (p values <0·05), as did nine of 15 single symptom items. Four (coughing, shortness of breath, fear of progression, and surgery-related symptoms) of the five multi-item scales and ten of the 15 single symptom items were sensitive to known group differences (ie, lower vs higher Karnofsky performance status).

INTERPRETATION

Results determined the psychometric properties of the updated lung cancer module, which is ready for use in international clinical studies.

FUNDING

EORTC Quality of Life Group.

摘要

背景

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)肺癌生命质量问卷-13(QLQ-LC13)用于评估肺癌患者的生命质量(QOL),是第一个为国际临床试验开发的 EORTC 模块。自 1994 年发表以来,主要的治疗进展可能会对 QOL 产生影响。这些变化要求对该模块及其国际心理测量学验证进行更新。我们旨在研究更新后的肺癌模块 QLQ-LC29 在肺癌患者中的量表结构和心理测量特性。

方法

这是一项在 12 个国家的 19 家医院进行的国际观察性现场研究。纳入年龄大于 18 岁、经确诊患有肺癌且无其他先前原发性肿瘤、精神状态良好、具有足够语言技能以理解和完成问卷的患者。在医院就诊期间,患者被要求填写纸质版核心问卷 EORTC QLQ-C30 加 QLQ-LC29,研究人员从中随机选择一半患者在 2-4 周后再次填写问卷。我们的主要目的是评估 EORTC QLQ-LC29 的量表结构和心理测量特性。我们采用验证性因子分析评估量表结构;采用 Cronbach's α 值(内部一致性)和组内相关系数(重测信度)评估可靠性;采用独立 t 检验(按卡氏行为状态评分分层)评估敏感性;采用方差分析评估随时间变化的反应能力。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02745691。

发现

2016 年 4 月 12 日至 2018 年 9 月 26 日,共纳入 523 例经确诊患有非小细胞肺癌(n=442)或小细胞肺癌(n=81)的患者。验证性因子分析提供了一个由五个多项目量表(咳嗽、呼吸困难、对进展的恐惧、头发问题和手术相关症状)加 15 个单项症状或副作用项目组成的解决方案:χ=370.233,均方根误差逼近值=0.075,和比较拟合指数=0.901。所有多项目量表的内部一致性 Cronbach's α 值均高于 0.70 的阈值。重测信度的组内相关系数在 0.82 至 0.97 之间。五个多项目量表中的三个(呼吸困难、对进展的恐惧和头发问题)和 15 个单项症状中的九个在随时间变化的反应能力方面具有统计学意义(p 值均<0.05)。五个多项目量表中的四个(咳嗽、呼吸困难、对进展的恐惧和手术相关症状)和 15 个单项症状中的十个对已知的组间差异(即,卡氏行为状态评分较高与较低)具有敏感性。

解释

结果确定了更新后的肺癌模块的心理测量特性,该模块已准备好用于国际临床研究。

资金

EORTC 生活质量组。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the updated EORTC module for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer (QLQ-LC29): an international, observational field study.更新后的 EORTC 肺癌患者生活质量评估模块(QLQ-LC29)的心理测量学特性:一项国际性、观察性现场研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):723-732. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30093-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
An international study to revise the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in lung cancer patients.一项修订用于评估肺癌患者生活质量的 EORTC 问卷的国际研究。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2874-2881. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx453.
3
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织肺癌特异性生存质量量表(EORTC QLQ-LC13):欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生存质量问卷(QLQ-C30)的模块化补充量表,用于肺癌临床试验。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生存质量研究组
Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(5):635-42. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90535-5.
4
International field testing of the psychometric properties of an EORTC quality of life module for oral health: the EORTC QLQ-OH15.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织口腔健康生活质量模块(EORTC QLQ-OH15)心理测量特性的国际现场测试
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3915-24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3216-0. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
5
Comparing the EORTC QLQ-LC13, EORTC QLQ-LC29, and the FACT-L for assessment of quality of life in patients with lung cancer - an updated systematic review.比较 EORTC QLQ-LC13、EORTC QLQ-LC29 和 FACT-L 在肺癌患者生活质量评估中的应用——一项更新的系统评价。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 1;18(4):260-268. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000725. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
6
International phase IV validation study of an EORTC quality of life questionnaire for testicular cancer patients: the EORTC QLQ-TC26.国际四期验证研究:EORTC 生活质量问卷在睾丸癌患者中的应用:EORTC QLQ-TC26。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):1104. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5036-8.
7
Psychometric validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire Sexual Health (EORTC QLQ-SH22).欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷性健康模块(EORTC QLQ-SH22)的心理测量学验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Sep;154:235-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
8
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life questionnaire cervical cancer module: EORTC QLQ-CX24.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量调查问卷宫颈癌模块:EORTC QLQ-CX24。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8):1812-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22217.
9
Health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer: validation of the Mexican-Spanish version and association with prognosis of the EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaire.肺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:EORTC QLQ-LC13 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版验证及其与预后的关系。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
10
International Psychometric Validation of an EORTC Quality of Life Module Measuring Cancer Related Fatigue (EORTC QLQ-FA12).EORTC 生活质量模块测量癌症相关疲劳的国际心理计量学验证(EORTC QLQ-FA12)。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 May 1;109(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw273.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Quality of Life in Daily Functioning, Communication with Care Teams, and Treatment Decisions in Patients with + NSCLC.生活质量在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者日常功能、与医护团队沟通及治疗决策中的作用
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2025 Jun 13;6(9):100863. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100863. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Validation of the cancer-specific utility measure EORTC QLU-C10D using evidence from four lung cancer trials covering six country value sets.利用来自四项涵盖六个国家价值集的肺癌试验的证据,对癌症特异性效用测量指标EORTC QLU-C10D进行验证。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83861-y.
3
FURLONG study: reply on the patient reported outcome measures and thresholds.
弗隆研究:关于患者报告结局指标及阈值的回复
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 10;56:101521. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101521. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Talking Cancer-Cancer Talking: A Linguistic and Thematic Analysis of Patient Narratives.谈论癌症——癌症的诉说:患者叙事的语言与主题分析
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 23;11:23743735241309472. doi: 10.1177/23743735241309472. eCollection 2024.
5
Symptom clusters and impact on quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.肺癌化疗患者的症状群及其对生活质量的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3363-3375. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03778-x. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
6
Electronic symptom monitoring after lung cancer surgery: establishing a core set of patient-reported outcomes for surgical oncology care in a longitudinal cohort study.肺癌手术后的电子症状监测:在一项纵向队列研究中建立一套用于外科肿瘤护理的患者报告结局的核心指标。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6591-6600. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001855.
7
Efficacy of a digital lifestyle intervention on health-related QUAlity of life in non-small cell LUng CAncer survivors following inpatient rehabilitation: protocol of the QUALUCA Swiss multicentre randomised controlled trial.数字生活方式干预对非小细胞肺癌住院康复后患者健康相关生活质量的疗效:QUALUCA 瑞士多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):e081397. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081397.
8
Cohort study investigating evolution and factors associated with dyspnoea after anatomic lung resection.一项队列研究,旨在调查解剖性肺切除术后呼吸困难的演变情况及相关因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):113-122. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-835. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
9
[Comparison of Quality of Life of the Patients Three Months after Uniportal 
and Multiportal Thoracoscopic Lobectomy].[单孔与多孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术后三个月患者生活质量的比较]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 20;26(11):843-850. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.102.42.
10
Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes 1 year after thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: a multicentre, prospective cohort study protocol.胸腔镜肺段切除术与肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌 1 年后的纵向患者报告结局:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):e067841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067841.