School of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Division of Research and Innovation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062151.
There have been very few theoretical models published to understand the relationship between workplace bullying and different outcome variables. Applying the Job Demands Control (JDC) model, this study analyzed workplace bullying alongside 'traditional' job stressors of role overload and low job control to determine the relative associations of each with mental health and wellbeing. These relative associations have not been well documented. Data were obtained from an organizational climate questionnaire administered to 21 Australian Defence Force units ( = 3193). Results indicated that the correlations between bullying and psychological distress ( = 0.39), job satisfaction ( = -0.28), and affective commitment ( = -0.22) were all significant and for some outcomes greater than those involving the traditional job stressors. Furthermore, for each of these three outcomes, bullying contributed incremental variance after controlling for other job demands. These results support earlier claims that workplace bullying requires the same attention given to traditional work stressors. The JDC model provides a strong theoretical base to investigate workplace bullying. Testing against other stressors allows for consideration of the broader context of workplace bullying when managing the workforce.
目前,仅有少量理论模型被用于理解工作场所欺凌与不同结果变量之间的关系。本研究应用工作要求-控制(JDC)模型,将工作场所欺凌与角色超载和低工作控制等“传统”工作压力源一并分析,以确定每种压力源与心理健康和幸福感的相对关联。这些相对关联尚未得到充分记录。数据来自于对 21 个澳大利亚国防部队单位(n=3193)进行的组织氛围问卷的调查。结果表明,欺凌与心理困扰(r=0.39)、工作满意度(r=-0.28)和情感承诺(r=-0.22)之间的相关性均具有统计学意义,且在某些结果上,其相关性大于传统工作压力源。此外,在控制了其他工作需求后,对于这三个结果中的每一个,欺凌都能额外解释一定的方差。这些结果支持了先前关于工作场所欺凌需要与传统工作压力源同样关注的说法。JDC 模型为研究工作场所欺凌提供了坚实的理论基础。与其他压力源进行比较,有助于在管理劳动力时考虑工作场所欺凌的更广泛背景。