Schepis Ty S, Klare Dalton L, Ford Jason A, McCabe Sean Esteban
Department of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Subst Abuse. 2020 Mar 5;14:1178221820909352. doi: 10.1177/1178221820909352. eCollection 2020.
Prescription drug misuse (PDM), or medication use without a prescription or in ways not intended by the prescriber, is a notable public health concern, especially in the United States. Accumulating research has characterized PDM prevalence and processes, but age-based or lifespan changes in PDM are understudied. Given age-based differences in the medical or developmental concerns that often underlie PDM, it is likely that PDM varies by age. This review summarizes the literature on PDM across the lifespan, examining lifespan changes in prevalence, sources, motives and correlates for opioid, stimulant, and tranquilizer/sedative (or benzodiazepine) PDM. In all, prevalence rates, sources and motives vary considerably by age group, with fewer age-based differences in correlates or risk factors. PDM prevalence rates tend to decline with aging, with greater use of physician sources and greater endorsement of self-treatment motives in older groups. Recreational motives (such as to get high) tend to peak in young adulthood, with greater use of peer sources or purchases to obtain medication for PDM in younger groups. PDM co-occurs with other substance use and psychopathology, including suicidality, across age groups. The evidence for lifespan variation in PDM is strongest for opioid PDM, with a need for more research on tranquilizer/sedative and stimulant PDM. The current literature is limited by the few studies of lifespan changes in PDM within a single sample, a lack of longitudinal research, little research addressing PDM in the context of polysubstance use, and little research on minority groups, such as sexual and gender minorities.
处方药滥用(PDM),即无处方用药或以处方医生未规定的方式用药,是一个显著的公共卫生问题,在美国尤为如此。越来越多的研究已描述了PDM的流行情况和过程,但针对基于年龄或全生命周期的PDM变化的研究却很少。鉴于常常构成PDM基础的医疗或发育问题存在基于年龄的差异,PDM很可能随年龄而变化。本综述总结了全生命周期内关于PDM的文献,研究了阿片类药物、兴奋剂和镇静剂/安定药(或苯二氮䓬类药物)PDM在流行率、来源、动机及相关因素方面的全生命周期变化。总体而言,不同年龄组的流行率、来源和动机差异很大,而在相关因素或风险因素方面基于年龄的差异较少。PDM流行率往往随年龄增长而下降,老年组更多地使用医生开的药,且更认可自我治疗动机。娱乐性动机(如为了兴奋)在青年期往往达到峰值,较年轻组更多地通过同伴渠道或购买来获取用于PDM的药物。在所有年龄组中,PDM都与其他物质使用及精神病理学(包括自杀倾向)同时出现。关于PDM全生命周期变化的证据在阿片类药物PDM方面最为确凿,而对于镇静剂/安定药和兴奋剂PDM则需要更多研究。当前的文献受到以下因素的限制:对单个样本内PDM全生命周期变化的研究较少、缺乏纵向研究、在多物质使用背景下针对PDM的研究很少,以及对少数群体(如性取向和性别少数群体)的研究很少。