• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区可步行性与主动交通出行:休闲和购物目的的关联研究。

Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation: A Correlation Study in Leisure and Shopping Purposes.

机构信息

Department of Urban Planning, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072178.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17072178
PMID:32218233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7177876/
Abstract

A walkable environment is a crucial factor for promoting active transportation. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between neighborhood walkability and active transportation for noncommuting purposes (leisure and shopping) in Seoul, Korea. The Walkability Score is used as a measure of walkability, and a multilevel logistic regression model is employed to measure the odds of active transportation (i.e., walking and cycling; nonmotorized trips) at two levels: individual (level 1) and neighborhood (level 2). The results of the study showed that the Walkability Score was significantly correlated with higher odds of active transportation in shopping models. Specifically, every one-point increase in the Walkability Score was associated with 1.5%-1.8% higher odds of active transportation in shopping models. However, there was no significant correlation between the two in leisure models. Meanwhile, individual characteristics associated with the odds of active transportation differed in the leisure and shopping models. Older age was positively correlated with the odds of active transportation in the leisure model, while females showed a positive correlation in the shopping model. Based on the study, urban and transportation planners can recommend urban policies to promote active transportation in an urban setting.

摘要

步行环境是促进积极交通的关键因素。本研究旨在检验韩国首尔社区步行便利性与非通勤目的(休闲和购物)的积极交通之间的关联。步行能力得分被用作衡量步行能力的指标,采用多层次逻辑回归模型来衡量两个层面上的积极交通(即步行和骑自行车;非机动出行)的几率:个人(第 1 层)和社区(第 2 层)。研究结果表明,步行能力得分与购物模型中积极交通的几率呈显著正相关。具体而言,步行能力得分每增加一分,购物模型中积极交通的几率就会增加 1.5%-1.8%。然而,在休闲模型中,两者之间没有显著的相关性。同时,与积极交通几率相关的个人特征在休闲和购物模型中有所不同。在休闲模型中,年龄越大,积极交通的几率就越高,而在购物模型中,女性则呈正相关。基于这项研究,城市和交通规划者可以推荐城市政策,以促进城市环境中的积极交通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abb/7177876/d788207e5e22/ijerph-17-02178-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abb/7177876/d788207e5e22/ijerph-17-02178-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abb/7177876/d788207e5e22/ijerph-17-02178-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation: A Correlation Study in Leisure and Shopping Purposes.社区可步行性与主动交通出行:休闲和购物目的的关联研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072178.
2
Does Environmental Walkability Matter? The Role of Walkable Environment in Active Commuting.环境可步行性是否重要?可步行环境在积极通勤中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 15;17(4):1261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041261.
3
Walk Score, Transportation Mode Choice, and Walking Among French Adults: A GPS, Accelerometer, and Mobility Survey Study.步行评分、交通方式选择与法国成年人的步行情况:一项基于全球定位系统、加速计和出行调查的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 20;13(6):611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060611.
4
Associations between the National Walkability Index and walking among US Adults - National Health Interview Survey, 2015.美国成年人的国家步行指数与步行之间的关联 - 2015 年全国健康访谈调查。
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106122. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106122. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Do the Walkability and Urban Leisure Amenities of Neighborhoods Affect the Body Mass Index of Individuals? Based on a Case Study in Seoul, South Korea.社区的可达性和城市休闲设施是否会影响个体的体重指数?基于韩国首尔的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;17(6):2060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062060.
6
Walkability and physical activity: findings from Curitiba, Brazil.步行性与身体活动:来自巴西库里蒂巴的研究结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.020.
7
Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study.社区可达性、身体活动与步行行为:瑞典社区与身体活动研究
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
Neighborhood Built Environment and Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Active Commuting and Sedentary Behavior, but not with Leisure-Time Physical Activity, in University Students.社区建成环境和社会经济地位与大学生的主动通勤和久坐行为相关,但与休闲时间体力活动无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 31;16(17):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173176.
9
Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking for transportation: A cross-sectional study of older adults living on low income.邻里步行便利性、身体活动与出行步行:一项针对低收入老年人的横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Apr 10;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0469-5.
10
The association between objective walkability, neighborhood socio-economic status, and physical activity in Belgian children.比利时儿童的客观步行便利性、邻里社会经济地位与身体活动之间的关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Aug 23;11:104. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0104-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining activity-friendly neighborhoods in the Norwegian context: green space and walkability in relation to physical activity and the moderating role of perceived safety.在挪威背景下考察适宜活动的社区:绿色空间和可步行性与身体活动的关系,以及感知安全的调节作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15170-4.
2
Global Matrix 4.0 physical activity report cards grades for children and adolescents: A comparison among 15 Asian countries and regions.《全球矩阵4.0:儿童和青少年身体活动成绩单》:15个亚洲国家和地区的比较
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2022 Oct;20(4):372-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Does Environmental Walkability Matter? The Role of Walkable Environment in Active Commuting.环境可步行性是否重要?可步行环境在积极通勤中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 15;17(4):1261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041261.
2
Walk Score and Its Associations with Older Adults' Health Behaviors and Outcomes.步行评分及其与老年人健康行为和结果的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;16(4):622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040622.
3
Unpacking walkability indices and their inherent assumptions.解析步行指数及其内在假设。
Association of neighborhood Walk Score with accelerometer-measured physical activity varies by neighborhood socioeconomic status in older women.
老年女性中,社区步行评分与通过加速度计测量的身体活动之间的关联因社区社会经济地位而异。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 28;29:101931. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101931. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Health Place. 2019 Jan;55:145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
The Independent Associations between Walk Score and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Waist Circumference, Waist-To-Hip Ratio and Body Mass Index Among Urban Adults.城市成年人中步行得分与邻里社会经济地位、腰围、腰臀比和体重指数之间的独立关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;15(6):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061226.
5
Neighborhood walk score and selected Cardiometabolic factors in the French RECORD cohort study.法国记录队列研究中的邻里步行得分与选定的心血管代谢因素
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4962-8.
6
Is Walk Score associated with hospital admissions from chronic diseases? Evidence from a cross-sectional study in a high socioeconomic status Australian city-state.步行便利性得分与慢性病住院情况有关联吗?来自澳大利亚一个高社会经济地位城邦的横断面研究证据。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e012548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012548.
7
Check the score: Field validation of Street Smart Walk Score in Alberta, Canada.查看评分:加拿大艾伯塔省“街头智能步行评分”的实地验证
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Sep 28;4:532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.09.010. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
Using Walk Score™ and Neighborhood Perceptions to Assess Walking Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults.使用步行评分™和邻里认知来评估中老年人的步行情况。
J Community Health. 2016 Oct;41(5):977-88. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0180-z.
9
Neighborhood Walkability and Body Mass Index Trajectories: Longitudinal Study of Canadians.邻里步行便利性与体重指数轨迹:加拿大人的纵向研究
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):934-40. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303096. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
10
Older adults' outdoor walking and the built environment: does income matter?老年人的户外步行与建成环境:收入有影响吗?
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:876. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2224-1.