Media and Entertainment Lab, School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, 4 Dublin, Ireland.
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2181. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072181.
Media-saturated digital environments seek to influence social media users' behaviour, including through marketing. The World Health Organization has identified food marketing, including advertising for unhealthy items, as detrimental to health, and in many countries, regulation restricts such marketing and advertising to younger children. Yet regulation rarely addresses adolescents and few studies have examined their responses to social media advertising. In two studies, we examined adolescents' attention, memory and social responses to advertising posts, including interactions between product types and source of posts. We hypothesized adolescents would respond more positively to unhealthy food advertising compared to healthy food or non-food advertising, and more positively to ads shared by peers or celebrities than to ads shared by a brand. Outcomes measured were (1a) (likelihood to 'share', attitude to peer); (1b) (recall, recognition) and (2) (eye-tracking fixation duration and count). Participants were 151 adolescent social media users (Study 1: = 72; 13-14 years; M = 13.56 years, SD = 0.5; Study 2: = 79, 13-17 years, = 15.37 years, = 1.351). They viewed 36 fictitious Facebook profile feeds created to show age-typical content. In a 3 × 3 factorial design, each contained an advertising post that varied by content (healthy/unhealthy/non-food) and source (peer/celebrity/company). Generalised linear mixed models showed that advertisements for unhealthy food evoked significantly more positive responses, compared to non-food and healthy food, on 5 of 6 measures: adolescents were more likely to wish to 'share' unhealthy posts; rated peers more positively when they had unhealthy posts in their feeds; recalled and recognised a greater number of unhealthy food brands; and viewed unhealthy advertising posts for longer. Interactions with sources (peers, celebrities and companies) were more complex but also favoured unhealthy food advertising. Implications are that regulation of unhealthy food advertising should address adolescents and digital media.
媒体饱和的数字环境试图影响社交媒体用户的行为,包括通过营销手段。世界卫生组织已将食品营销(包括对不健康食品的广告宣传)认定为有害健康的行为,在许多国家,法规限制此类营销和广告宣传针对年幼的儿童。然而,法规很少涉及青少年,很少有研究调查他们对社交媒体广告的反应。在两项研究中,我们研究了青少年对广告帖子的注意力、记忆和社会反应,包括产品类型和帖子来源之间的相互作用。我们假设,与健康食品或非食品广告相比,青少年对不健康食品广告的反应更为积极,对同龄人或名人分享的广告的反应比对品牌分享的广告的反应更为积极。衡量的结果包括(1a)(分享的可能性、对同龄人的态度);(1b)(回忆、识别)和(2)(眼动追踪注视持续时间和计数)。参与者是 151 名青少年社交媒体用户(研究 1:n = 72;13-14 岁;M = 13.56 岁,SD = 0.5;研究 2:n = 79,13-17 岁,M = 15.37 岁,SD = 1.351)。他们查看了 36 个虚构的 Facebook 个人资料提要,这些提要旨在展示典型的年龄内容。在一个 3 × 3 因子设计中,每个提要都包含一个广告帖子,内容因内容(健康/不健康/非食品)和来源(同龄人/名人/公司)而异。广义线性混合模型显示,与非食品和健康食品相比,不健康食品的广告宣传在 6 项指标中的 5 项上引起了更为积极的反应:青少年更有可能希望“分享”不健康的帖子;当他们的提要中有不健康的帖子时,他们对同龄人评价更高;回忆和识别出更多不健康食品品牌;并且对不健康的广告帖子观看的时间更长。与来源(同龄人、名人、公司)的互动更为复杂,但也有利于不健康食品的广告宣传。这意味着,对不健康食品广告的监管应该针对青少年和数字媒体。