Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143087. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43087.
Celebrity social media posts engage millions of young followers daily, but the nutritional quality of foods and beverages in such posts, sponsored and unsponsored, is unknown.
To quantify the nutritional quality of foods and beverages depicted in social media accounts of highly followed celebrities and assess whether nutritional quality is associated with post sponsorship, celebrity profession or gender, and followers' likes and comments.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed the content of food- and beverage-containing posts from Instagram (a photo- and video-sharing social media platform) accounts of 181 highly followed athletes, actors, actresses, television personalities, and music artists. Data were collected from May 2019 to March 2020.
The nutritional quality of foods and beverages posted in celebrity social media accounts was rated using the Nutrient Profile Index (NPI) based on the sugar, sodium, energy, saturated fat, fiber, protein, and fruit and/or vegetable content per 100-g sample (a score of 0 indicated least healthy and 100, healthiest); foods with scores less than 64 and beverages with scores less than 70 were rated as "less healthy." Secondary outcomes were whether the nutritional quality of foods and beverages in social media posts was associated with post sponsorship, celebrity profession or gender, and followers' likes and comments. Mixed-effects regression models were used to estimate how outcomes differed across fixed effects.
The sample included social media accounts of 181 celebrities (66 actors, actresses, and television personalities [36.5%]; 64 music artists [35.4%]; and 51 athletes [28.2%]). A total of 102 celebrities (56.4%) were male, and the median age was 32 years (range, 17-73 years). Among 3065 social media posts containing 5180 total foods and beverages (2467 foods [47.6%]; 2713 beverages [52.4%]), snacks and sweets (920 [37.3%] of the foods) and alcoholic beverages (1375 [50.7%] of the beverages) were most common. Overall, 158 celebrity social media accounts (87.3%) earned a less healthy overall food nutrition score and 162 (89.5%) earned a less healthy overall beverage nutrition score, which would be unhealthy enough to fail legal youth advertising limits in the UK. For foods, social media posts with healthier nutrition scores were associated with significantly fewer likes (b, -0.003; 95% CI, -0.006 to 0.000; P = .04) and comments (b, -0.006; 95% CI, -0.009 to -0.003; P < .001) from followers. For beverages, nutrition scores were not significantly associated with likes (b, -0.010; 95% CI, -0.025 to 0.005; P = .18) or comments (b, -0.003; 95% CI, -0.022 to 0.016; P = .73). Only 147 food- or beverage-containing posts (4.8%) were sponsored by food- or beverage-relevant companies. Beverages in sponsored posts contained more than twice as much alcohol as those in nonsponsored posts (10.8 g [95% CI, 9.3 g to 12.3 g] per 100 g of beverage vs 5.3 g [95% CI, 4.7 g to 5.9 g] per 100 g of beverage).
In this cross-sectional study, most highly followed celebrity social media accounts depicted an unhealthy profile of foods and beverages, primarily in nonsponsored posts. These results suggest that influential depictions of unhealthy food and beverage consumption on social media may be a sociocultural problem that extends beyond advertisements and sponsorships, reinforcing unhealthy consumption norms.
名人社交媒体帖子每天吸引数百万年轻粉丝,但这些帖子中所描述的食品和饮料的营养质量(包括赞助和非赞助)尚不清楚。
量化社交媒体账户中高度关注的名人所发布的食品和饮料的营养质量,并评估营养质量是否与帖子的赞助、名人职业或性别以及粉丝的点赞和评论有关。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究分析了来自 181 位高度关注的运动员、演员、女演员、电视名人、音乐艺术家的 Instagram(照片和视频分享社交媒体平台)账户中包含食物和饮料的帖子的内容。数据于 2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 3 月期间收集。
使用基于每 100 克样本中的糖、钠、能量、饱和脂肪、纤维、蛋白质以及水果和/或蔬菜含量的营养素谱指数(NPI)对名人社交媒体账户中发布的食品和饮料的营养质量进行评分(分数为 0 表示最不健康,100 表示最健康);评分低于 64 的食品和评分低于 70 的饮料被评为“不健康”。次要结果是社交媒体帖子中食品和饮料的营养质量是否与帖子的赞助、名人职业或性别以及粉丝的点赞和评论有关。使用混合效应回归模型来估计不同固定效应之间的结果差异。
样本包括 181 位名人的社交媒体账户(66 位演员、女演员和电视名人[36.5%];64 位音乐艺术家[35.4%];51 位运动员[28.2%])。共有 102 位名人(56.4%)为男性,中位年龄为 32 岁(范围为 17-73 岁)。在 3065 个包含 5180 种食品和饮料(2467 种食品[47.6%];2713 种饮料[52.4%])的社交媒体帖子中,零食和甜食(2467 种食品中的 920 种[37.3%])和酒精饮料(2713 种饮料中的 1375 种[50.7%])最常见。总体而言,158 个名人社交媒体账户(87.3%)的整体食品营养评分较低,162 个(89.5%)的整体饮料营养评分较低,如果按照英国的青少年广告限制标准,这些评分都足以被判定为不健康。对于食品,营养评分较高的社交媒体帖子与点赞(b,-0.003;95%置信区间,-0.006 至 0.000;P = .04)和评论(b,-0.006;95%置信区间,-0.009 至 -0.003;P < .001)的数量减少显著相关。对于饮料,营养评分与点赞(b,-0.010;95%置信区间,-0.025 至 0.005;P = .18)或评论(b,-0.003;95%置信区间,-0.022 至 0.016;P = .73)之间没有显著关联。只有 147 个包含食物或饮料的帖子(4.8%)是由食品或饮料相关公司赞助的。赞助帖子中的饮料酒精含量是未赞助帖子中的两倍多(每 100 克饮料中含有 10.8 克[95%置信区间,9.3 克至 12.3 克]酒精,而每 100 克饮料中含有 5.3 克[95%置信区间,4.7 克至 5.9 克]酒精)。
在这项横断面研究中,高度关注的名人社交媒体账户中描述的食品和饮料的健康状况主要是非赞助帖子中主要是不健康的。这些结果表明,社交媒体上对不健康食品和饮料消费的有影响力的描述可能不仅仅是广告和赞助,而是延伸到了社会文化问题之外,强化了不健康的消费规范。