• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估健康信息系统中的数据保护与治理:一种隐私与伦理影响及绩效评估(PEIPA)的新方法。

Assessing data protection and governance in health information systems: a novel methodology of Privacy and Ethics Impact and Performance Assessment (PEIPA).

作者信息

Di Iorio Concetta Tania, Carinci Fabrizio, Oderkirk Jillian, Smith David, Siano Manuela, de Marco Dorotea Alessandra, de Lusignan Simon, Hamalainen Paivi, Benedetti Massimo Massi

机构信息

Executive Office, Legal, Serectrix snc, Pescara, Italy

Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2020 Mar 27. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105948.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2019-105948
PMID:32220868
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data processing of health research databases often requires a Data Protection Impact Assessment to evaluate the severity of the risk and the appropriateness of measures taken to comply with the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). We aimed to define and apply a comprehensive method for the evaluation of privacy, data governance and ethics among research networks involved in the EU Project Bridge Health.

METHODS

Computerised survey among associated partners of main EU Consortia, using a targeted instrument designed by the principal investigator and progressively refined in collaboration with an international advisory panel. Descriptive measures using the percentage of adoption of privacy, data governance and ethical principles as main endpoints were used for the analysis and interpretation of the results.

RESULTS

A total of 15 centres provided relevant information on the processing of sensitive data from 10 European countries. Major areas of concern were noted for: data linkage (median, range of adoption: 45%, 30%-80%), access and accuracy of personal data (50%, 0%-100%) and anonymisation procedures (56%, 11%-100%). A high variability was noted in the application of privacy principles.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive methodology of Privacy and Ethics Impact and Performance Assessment was successfully applied at international level. The method can help implementing the GDPR and expanding the scope of Data Protection Impact Assessment, so that the public benefit of the secondary use of health data could be well balanced with the respect of personal privacy.

摘要

背景

健康研究数据库的数据处理通常需要进行数据保护影响评估,以评估风险的严重程度以及为遵守欧盟(EU)《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)而采取措施的适当性。我们旨在定义并应用一种全面的方法,用于评估参与欧盟“桥梁健康”项目的研究网络中的隐私、数据治理和伦理问题。

方法

对主要欧盟财团的相关合作伙伴进行计算机化调查,使用由首席研究员设计并与国际咨询小组合作逐步完善的针对性工具。以隐私、数据治理和伦理原则的采用率作为主要终点的描述性措施用于结果的分析和解释。

结果

共有15个中心提供了来自10个欧洲国家的敏感数据处理的相关信息。主要关注领域包括:数据链接(采用率中位数、范围:45%,30%-80%)、个人数据的访问和准确性(50%,0%-100%)以及匿名化程序(56%,11%-100%)。隐私原则的应用存在很大差异。

结论

隐私与伦理影响及绩效评估的综合方法在国际层面成功应用。该方法有助于实施GDPR并扩大数据保护影响评估的范围,从而使健康数据二次利用的公共利益与个人隐私的尊重能够得到很好的平衡。

相似文献

1
Assessing data protection and governance in health information systems: a novel methodology of Privacy and Ethics Impact and Performance Assessment (PEIPA).评估健康信息系统中的数据保护与治理:一种隐私与伦理影响及绩效评估(PEIPA)的新方法。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Mar 27. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105948.
2
Impact of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Health Data Management in a European Union Candidate Country: A Case Study of Serbia.《欧洲通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)对欧盟候选国健康数据管理的影响:以塞尔维亚为例
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Apr 17;8(4):e14604. doi: 10.2196/14604.
3
Record linkage of population-based cohort data from minors with national register data: a scoping review and comparative legal analysis of four European countries.基于人群的未成年人队列数据与国家登记数据的记录链接:四个欧洲国家的范围审查和比较法律分析
Open Res Eur. 2021 Sep 27;1:58. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13689.2. eCollection 2021.
4
The significance of general data protection regulation in the compliant data contribution to the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.一般数据保护条例在符合规定的数据向欧洲胸外科协会数据库贡献方面的意义。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Sep 7;64(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad289.
5
The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on health research.《通用数据保护条例》对健康研究的影响。
Br Med Bull. 2018 Dec 1;128(1):109-118. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy038.
6
Building a Privacy, Ethics, and Data Access Framework for Real World Computerised Medical Record System Data: A Delphi Study. Contribution of the Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group.构建真实世界计算机化医疗记录系统数据的隐私、伦理与数据访问框架:德尔菲研究。初级卫生保健信息学工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):138-145. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-035.
7
Health data privacy through homomorphic encryption and distributed ledger computing: an ethical-legal qualitative expert assessment study.通过同态加密和分布式账本计算实现健康数据隐私保护:一项伦理法律定性专家评估研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 1;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00852-2.
8
OpenEHR and General Data Protection Regulation: Evaluation of Principles and Requirements.开放电子健康记录与通用数据保护条例:原则与要求评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Mar 25;7(1):e9845. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9845.
9
Cross-border flow of health information: is 'privacy by design' enough? Privacy performance assessment in EUBIROD.跨境卫生信息流动:“隐私设计”是否足够?EUBIROD 的隐私性能评估。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Apr;23(2):247-53. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks043. Epub 2012 May 4.
10
Using routinely collected health data for surveillance, quality improvement and research: Framework and key questions to assess ethics, privacy and data access.利用常规收集的健康数据进行监测、质量改进和研究:评估伦理、隐私和数据访问的框架及关键问题
J Innov Health Inform. 2016 Jan 19;22(4):426-32. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i4.845.

引用本文的文献

1
Examine frameworks policies and strategies for effective information governance in healthcare organizations.审视医疗保健组织中有效信息治理的框架、政策和策略。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327496. eCollection 2025.
2
The Regulatory Landscape of Biobanks In Europe: From Accreditation to Intellectual Property.欧洲生物样本库的监管格局:从认证到知识产权
Curr Genomics. 2025;26(1):15-23. doi: 10.2174/0113892029313697240729091922. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Generalisable Overview of Study Risk for Lead Investigators Needing Guidance (GOSLING): A data governance risk tool.
适用于需要指导的主要研究者的研究风险概述(GOSLING):一个数据治理风险工具。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0309308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309308. eCollection 2024.
4
SCORE2-Diabetes: 10-year cardiovascular risk estimation in type 2 diabetes in Europe.SCORE2-Diabetes:欧洲 2 型糖尿病的 10 年心血管风险评估。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 21;44(28):2544-2556. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad260.
5
Management of Onsite and Remote Communication in Oncology Hospitals: Data Protection in an Era of Rapid Technological Advances.肿瘤医院现场与远程通信管理:技术快速发展时代的数据保护
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 28;13(5):761. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050761.
6
Making Use of Comparable Health Data to Improve Quality of Care and Outcomes in Diabetes: The EUBIROD Review of Diabetes Registries and Data Sources in Europe.利用可比健康数据改善糖尿病护理质量和治疗结果:欧洲糖尿病登记处和数据源的EUBIROD综述
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2021 Oct 11;2:744516. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.744516. eCollection 2021.
7
Monocyte Distribution Width as a predictor of community acquired sepsis in patients prospectively enrolled at the Emergency Department.单核细胞分布宽度可预测急诊前瞻性纳入的社区获得性败血症患者。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07803-7.
8
Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score.用于支持确诊 COVID-19 患者在急诊科早期决策的预测模型的可靠性:佩斯卡拉 COVID 医院评分。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):1062. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08421-4.
9
Adherence to General Diabetes and Foot Care Processes, with Prompt Referral, Are Associated with Amputation-Free Survival in People with Type 2 Diabetes and Foot Ulcers: A Scottish National Registry Analysis.坚持一般糖尿病和足部护理流程,并及时转诊,与 2 型糖尿病和足部溃疡患者的无截肢生存率相关:苏格兰国家注册分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Jun 14;2022:7414258. doi: 10.1155/2022/7414258. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessing the Legal Aspects of Information Security Requirements for Health Care in 3 Countries: Scoping Review and Framework Development.评估三个国家医疗保健信息安全要求的法律方面:范围审查与框架制定
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 25;9(2):e30050. doi: 10.2196/30050.