University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Jul;22(4):512-523. doi: 10.1177/1524839920913548. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
The community health worker (CHW) model is utilized globally to promote health and reduce health disparities in hard-to-reach and underserved communities. The model is deemed successful due to involvement of these natural helpers who are familiar with the local customs, language, and traditions. "Research" CHWs (also known as ) serve as cultural mediators between their community and academic researchers and are increasingly involved in the design and implementation of research; yet few of these individuals have received formal training in research methods or ethics. This study identified requisite skills and knowledge needed by research CHWs. Investigators who utilized the CHW/promotor model were recruited to complete a survey and participate in one of four focus group sessions. Participants identified (1) research roles, (2) training received, (3) research competencies, (4) training barriers and facilitators, and (5) assessment preferences. Participants ( = 20) completed a survey with 19 also participating in a focus group session. All participants involved CHWs in research implementation, with nearly half involving CHWs in the study design and/or dissemination of findings phases. Critical thinking skills and application of ethical principles (e.g., demonstrating respect) were prioritized over knowledge of research infrastructure (e.g., institutional review board/ethics review process). Research ethics training designed for academic researchers was deemed inappropriate because sophisticated terminology and web-based delivery were perceived as an access barrier. Self-assessment and contextualized scenarios were recommended to assess critical thinking. Researchers using the CHW model should provide relevant and accessible research competency training.
社区卫生工作者(CHW)模式在全球范围内被用于促进健康和减少难以企及和服务不足的社区的健康差距。该模式被认为是成功的,因为这些自然帮手熟悉当地的习俗、语言和传统。“研究”CHW(也称为)在他们的社区和学术研究人员之间充当文化中介,并且越来越多地参与研究的设计和实施;然而,这些人很少接受过研究方法或伦理方面的正式培训。本研究确定了研究 CHW 需要的必要技能和知识。利用 CHW/推动者模型的研究人员被招募来完成一项调查,并参加四个焦点小组会议中的一个。参与者确定了(1)研究角色,(2)接受的培训,(3)研究能力,(4)培训障碍和促进因素,以及(5)评估偏好。20 名参与者完成了一项调查,其中 19 名还参加了一个焦点小组会议。所有参与者都让 CHW 参与研究实施,近一半的参与者让 CHW 参与研究设计和/或研究结果的传播阶段。批判性思维技能和伦理原则的应用(例如,表现出尊重)优先于对研究基础设施的了解(例如,机构审查委员会/伦理审查过程)。为学术研究人员设计的研究伦理培训被认为不适当,因为复杂的术语和基于网络的交付方式被认为是一个进入障碍。建议进行自我评估和情境化情景评估来评估批判性思维。使用 CHW 模型的研究人员应提供相关和可访问的研究能力培训。