7547 Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
5170 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):364-371. doi: 10.1177/0033354920912717. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
The influence of socioeconomic disparities on adults with pneumonia is not well understood. The objective of our study was to evaluate the relationship between community-level socioeconomic position, as measured by an area deprivation index, and the incidence, severity, and outcomes among adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
This was an ancillary study of a population-based, prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with CAP in Louisville, Kentucky, from June 1, 2013, through May 31, 2015. We used a race-specific, block group-level area deprivation index as a proxy for community-level socioeconomic position and evaluated it as a predictor of CAP incidence, CAP severity, early clinical improvement, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality.
The cohort comprised 6349 unique adults hospitalized with CAP. CAP incidence per 100 000 population increased significantly with increasing levels of area deprivation, from 303 in tertile 1 (low deprivation), to 467 in tertile 2 (medium deprivation), and 553 in tertile 3 (high deprivation) ( < .001). Adults in medium- and high-deprivation areas had significantly higher odds of severe CAP (tertile 2 odds ratio [OR] = 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.39]; tertile 3 OR = 1.4 [95% CI, 1.18-1.64] and 1-year mortality (tertile 2 OR = 1.3 [95% CI, 1.11-1.54], tertile 3 OR = 1.3 [95% CI, 1.10-1.64]) than adults in low-deprivation areas.
Compared with adults residing in low-deprivation areas, adults residing in high-deprivation areas had an increased incidence of CAP, and they were more likely to have severe CAP. Beyond 30 days of care, we identified an increased long-term mortality for persons in high-deprivation areas. Community-level socioeconomic position should be considered an important factor for research in CAP and policy decisions.
社会经济差异对肺炎患者的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估社区剥夺指数衡量的社区水平社会经济地位与社区获得性肺炎(CAP)成人发病率、严重程度和结局之间的关系。
这是肯塔基州路易斯维尔市 CAP 住院患者的基于人群的前瞻性队列研究的辅助研究,研究时间为 2013 年 6 月 1 日至 2015 年 5 月 31 日。我们使用特定种族的街区组级剥夺指数作为社区水平社会经济地位的替代指标,并评估其对 CAP 发病率、CAP 严重程度、早期临床改善、30 天死亡率和 1 年死亡率的预测价值。
该队列包括 6349 例 CAP 住院的独特成年人。每 100000 人口的 CAP 发病率随剥夺程度的增加而显著增加,从第 1 三分位数(低剥夺)的 303 例,到第 2 三分位数(中剥夺)的 467 例,再到第 3 三分位数(高剥夺)的 553 例(<0.001)。中高剥夺地区的成年人患严重 CAP 的几率明显更高(第 2 三分位数 OR=1.2[95%置信区间(CI),1.06-1.39];第 3 三分位数 OR=1.4[95%CI,1.18-1.64]和 1 年死亡率(第 2 三分位数 OR=1.3[95%CI,1.11-1.54],第 3 三分位数 OR=1.3[95%CI,1.10-1.64])高于低剥夺地区的成年人。
与居住在低剥夺地区的成年人相比,居住在高剥夺地区的成年人 CAP 发病率更高,且 CAP 严重程度更高。在 30 天治疗后,我们发现高剥夺地区人群的长期死亡率更高。社区水平社会经济地位应被视为 CAP 研究和政策决策的一个重要因素。