Jessel Joshua, Hanley Gregory P, Ghaemmaghami Mahshid
1Queens College, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Queens, NY 11367 USA.
2Western New England University, Springfield, MA USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Jun 11;13(1):205-216. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00366-1. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The functional analysis procedures described in the seminal Iwata et al. (1982/1994) study are prominent in the applied behavior analytic literature, having been replicated hundreds of times over the past 30 years (Beavers, Iwata, & Lerman, 2013; Hanley, McCord, Iwata, 2003). However, the extent to which particular components of this functional analysis model have become more or less prominent over time is not clear from these literature reviews. We therefore conducted a review of the functional analysis literature between the years of 1965 and 2016 to determine the trends in the usage of particular components over time and to determine if the published literature reflects a standardization of the manner in which functional analyses of problem behavior are conducted. Furthermore, we discuss whether or not this standardization of a functional analysis model is currently necessary.
Iwata等人于1982年/1994年发表的开创性研究中所描述的功能分析程序,在应用行为分析文献中颇为突出,在过去30年里已被重复了数百次(Beavers、Iwata和Lerman,2013年;Hanley、McCord、Iwata,2003年)。然而,从这些文献综述中并不清楚该功能分析模型的特定组成部分随着时间的推移变得更加突出还是不那么突出。因此,我们对1965年至2016年间的功能分析文献进行了综述,以确定特定组成部分随时间的使用趋势,并确定已发表的文献是否反映了问题行为功能分析实施方式的标准化。此外,我们还讨论了目前是否有必要对功能分析模型进行这种标准化。