Suppr超能文献

辅助 tailored 剂量密集化疗与标准三周化疗治疗高危早期乳腺癌患者的长期(长达 16 个月)健康相关生活质量。

Long-term (up to 16 months) health-related quality of life after adjuvant tailored dose-dense chemotherapy vs. standard three-weekly chemotherapy in women with high-risk early breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum J5:17, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, 171 64, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 May;181(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05602-9. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare HRQoL effects of two modern adjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer treatment regimens at six time-points up to 16 months after random assignment.

METHODS

The open-label, randomized, Phase 3 "Panther trial" was conducted between February 2007 and September 2011. 760 women, aged 65 years and younger, after surgery for non-metastatic node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomized 1:1 to the experimental group (four cycles of tailored and dose-dense adjuvant epirubicin and cyclophosphamide/2 weeks followed by four cycles of tailored dose-dense docetaxel/2 weeks) or standard group (three cycles of fluorouracil and epirubicin-cyclophosphamide/3 weeks followed by three cycles of docetaxel/3 weeks). HRQoL was assessed at all Swedish centres using EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 at six points during 16 months before randomization.

RESULTS

Response rates to questionnaires were highest at baseline 728/780 (93%) and lowest 16 months after randomization, 557/750 (74%). HRQoL declined during treatment in both groups. At the end of treatment, the experimental group reported statistically significantly lower HRQoL (P < 0.001) than the standard group on global health status, physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, fatigue, sexual functioning, and systemic therapy effects. No differences were found for emotional functioning, body image, and arm and breast symptoms. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at the first follow-up and at subsequent assessments. HRQoL levels at the 16-month follow-up were similar to baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative HRQoL impact of the dose-dense and tailored strategy appears to be prominent during treatment, but HRQoL recover once treatment ends.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00798070; isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN39017665.

摘要

目的

前瞻性比较两种现代辅助化疗乳腺癌治疗方案在随机分组后长达 16 个月的 6 个时间点的 HRQoL 效应。

方法

开放标签、随机、III 期“Panther 试验”于 2007 年 2 月至 2011 年 9 月进行。760 名年龄在 65 岁及以下的非转移性淋巴结阳性或高危淋巴结阴性乳腺癌手术后患者,按 1:1 随机分配至实验组(4 个周期的个体化和密集辅助表柔比星和环磷酰胺/2 周,随后是 4 个周期的个体化密集多西紫杉醇/2 周)或标准组(3 个周期的氟尿嘧啶和表柔比星-环磷酰胺/3 周,随后是 3 个周期的多西紫杉醇/3 周)。在随机分组前的 16 个月内,所有瑞典中心使用 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC QLQ-BR23 在 6 个时间点评估 HRQoL。

结果

对问卷的反应率在基线时最高(728/780,93%),在随机分组后 16 个月时最低(557/750,74%)。两组的 HRQoL 在治疗期间均下降。在治疗结束时,实验组报告的全球健康状况、身体功能、角色功能、社会功能、疲劳、性功能和全身治疗效果方面的 HRQoL 明显低于标准组(P < 0.001)。两组之间在情绪功能、身体形象和手臂和乳房症状方面没有差异。两组在第一次随访和后续评估时均无统计学差异。16 个月随访时的 HRQoL 水平与基线值相似。

结论

密集和个体化策略的负面 HRQoL 影响在治疗期间似乎很明显,但一旦治疗结束,HRQoL 就会恢复。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00798070;isrctn.org 标识符:ISRCTN39017665。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665c/7182635/5de84f2298df/10549_2020_5602_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验