Suppr超能文献

局部晚期乳腺癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量:一项国际随机对照III期试验。

Health-related quality of life in survivors of locally advanced breast cancer: an international randomised controlled phase III trial.

作者信息

Bottomley Andrew, Therasse Patrick, Piccart Martine, Efficace Fabio, Coens Corneel, Gotay Carolyn, Welnicka-Jaskiewicz Marzena, Mauriac Louis, Dyczka Jaroslaw, Cufer Tanja, Lichinitser Michail R, Schornagel Jan H, Bonnefoi Herve, Shepherd Lois

机构信息

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC Data Center, Qualtiy of Life Unit, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2005 May;6(5):287-94. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70100-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dose-intensive chemotherapy has generated much interest in the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer because it might offer a survival benefit. We aimed to compare the effects of such an approach with those of standard chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

224 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to 75 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide given orally on days 1-14, and 60 mg/m(2) epirubicin and 500 mg/m(2) fluorouracil both given intravenously on days 1 and 8, for six cycles every 28 days (6 months' treatment; standard treatment) and 224 patients to 830 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide and 120 mg/m(2) epirubicin both given intravenously on day 1, and 5 microg/kg filgrastim per day given subcutaneously on days 2-13, for six cycles every 14 days (3 months' treatment; dose-intensive treatment). HRQOL was assessed by use of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Baseline assessments were done before randomisation; then once a month for the first 3 months; and at months 6, 9, 12, 18, 26, 34, 42, 48, and 54. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints were HRQOL, response, safety, overall response, and health economics. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Previously reported data showed that groups did not differ in progression-free survival. Patients assigned shorter, intensified treatment had a significantly lower overall HRQOL score during the first 3 months than did those assigned standard treatment (mean score at 3 months 41.8 [SD 1.78] vs 49.6 [1.64], p=0.0015). However, scores returned to near baseline, with no difference between groups, at 12 months (62.6 [1.97] vs 65.6 [2.04], p=0.3007). Over the remaining 2 years, the groups showed few significant differences in HRQOL.

INTERPRETATION

Dose-intensive treatment only has a temporary effect on HRQOL, thus enabling more research on intensive treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

摘要

背景

剂量密集化疗因可能带来生存获益,已在局部晚期乳腺癌患者的治疗中引发了广泛关注。我们旨在比较这种治疗方法与标准化疗对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响。

方法

224例局部晚期乳腺癌患者被随机分配,一组接受每28天为一个周期,共六个周期(6个月治疗)的标准化疗,具体为第1 - 14天口服75mg/m²环磷酰胺,第1天和第8天静脉注射60mg/m²表柔比星和500mg/m²氟尿嘧啶;另一组接受每14天为一个周期,共六个周期(3个月治疗)的剂量密集化疗,具体为第1天静脉注射830mg/m²环磷酰胺和120mg/m²表柔比星,第2 - 13天皮下注射每日5μg/kg非格司亭。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷30(EORTC QLQ - C30)评估HRQOL。随机分组前进行基线评估;随后在前3个月每月评估一次;并在第6、9、12、18、26、34、42、48和54个月进行评估。主要终点是无进展生存期;次要终点是HRQOL、缓解情况、安全性、总体缓解率和卫生经济学。分析采用意向性治疗。

研究结果

先前报告的数据显示,两组在无进展生存期方面无差异。接受较短疗程强化治疗的患者在最初3个月的总体HRQOL评分显著低于接受标准化疗的患者(3个月时的平均评分分别为41.8 [标准差1.78] 与49.6 [1.64],p = 0.0015)。然而,在12个月时评分恢复至接近基线水平,两组之间无差异(62.6 [1.97] 与65.6 [2.04],p = 0.3007)。在接下来的2年中,两组在HRQOL方面几乎没有显著差异。

解读

剂量密集治疗对HRQOL仅产生暂时影响,从而使得针对局部晚期乳腺癌患者的强化治疗能够开展更多研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验