• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队会议(MDT)实施后胰腺手术的结果:一项质量改进研究。

The results of pancreatic operations after the implementation of multidisciplinary team conference (MDT): A quality improvement study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2020 May;77:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.045. Epub 2020 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.045
PMID:32234347
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Centralization has improved the outcome of complex operations including cancer surgery. Moreover, the implementation of multidisciplinary team conferences (MDT) has ameliorated the decision making, but the impact on patient outcome is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the outcome of pancreatic surgery in the setting of centralization and upfront multidisciplinary decision making.

METHOD

The decisions of MDT from 2010 to 2016 and the outcome of operations were compared with operations from 2003 to 2009 before centralization of pancreatic surgery and implementation of MDT. Data were drawn from the department's database and from hospital's electronic patient files.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2016, 7.015 patients were evaluated at the MDT. In 72.6% of patients a treatment plan followed the first evaluation, the referral diagnosis was changed in 12.4% of cases. Of 3.362 solid neoplasms, 1.680 (50.0%) were evaluated as resectable and 1.080 (32.1%) patients were operated. The annual resection rate of operated patients was78.3%-88.5% (median 80.0%) compared to 21.4% to 80.% (median 68.6%, p = 0.0001) from 2003 to 2009 with 279 operated patients. The post-operative 30 - and 90-days mortality from 2003 to 2009 and 2010 to 2016 was 3.4% vs. 1.8% (NS) and 5.0% vs 3.6% (NS). In the same periods explorative laparotomies and palliative resections decreased from 18.3% to 3.6% (p = 0.0001) and 18.6%-10.2% (p = 0.0002). The median survival of radically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) from 2003 to 2009 and from 2010 to 2016 was 20.2 and 21.9 months, respectively (p = 0.687).

CONCLUSION

The MDT increased patient flow, improved quality of decision-making and offered more patients surgical treatment without increasing morbidity or mortality. But an impact on the long-term survival of patients with PAC was not found.

摘要

背景

集中化已经改善了包括癌症手术在内的复杂手术的结果。此外,多学科团队会议(MDT)的实施改善了决策,但对患者预后的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在调查集中化和多学科决策制定对胰腺手术结果的影响。

方法

比较了 2010 年至 2016 年 MDT 的决策和手术结果与胰腺手术集中化和 MDT 实施前的 2003 年至 2009 年的手术结果。数据来自科室数据库和医院电子病历。

结果

2010 年至 2016 年,MDT 评估了 7015 例患者。在 72.6%的患者中,首次评估后制定了治疗计划,12.4%的患者转诊诊断发生了改变。3362 例实体肿瘤中,1680 例(50.0%)评估为可切除,1080 例(32.1%)患者接受了手术。接受手术的患者的年切除率为 78.3%-88.5%(中位数为 80.0%),而 2003 年至 2009 年为 21.4%-80.0%(中位数为 68.6%,p=0.0001),接受手术的患者为 279 例。2003 年至 2009 年和 2010 年至 2016 年的术后 30 天和 90 天死亡率分别为 3.4%和 1.8%(NS)和 5.0%和 3.6%(NS)。同期探查性剖腹手术和姑息性切除术分别从 18.3%降至 3.6%(p=0.0001)和 18.6%-10.2%(p=0.0002)。2003 年至 2009 年和 2010 年至 2016 年根治性切除的胰腺腺癌(PAC)的中位生存期分别为 20.2 个月和 21.9 个月(p=0.687)。

结论

MDT 增加了患者流量,改善了决策质量,并为更多患者提供了手术治疗,而不会增加发病率或死亡率。但对 PAC 患者的长期生存没有影响。

相似文献

1
The results of pancreatic operations after the implementation of multidisciplinary team conference (MDT): A quality improvement study.多学科团队会议(MDT)实施后胰腺手术的结果:一项质量改进研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 May;77:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.045. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
2
The key role of multidisciplinary team in pancreatic operation decision making - An invited commentary on: "The results of pancreatic operations after the implementation of multidisciplinary team conference (MDT): A quality improvement study".多学科团队在胰腺手术决策中的关键作用——对《多学科团队会议(MDT)实施后胰腺手术的结果:一项质量改进研究》的特邀评论
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:24-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.017. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
3
Commentary on "the results of pancreatic operations after the implementation of multidisciplinary team conference (MDT): A quality improvement study".关于“多学科团队会议(MDT)实施后胰腺手术结果:一项质量改进研究”的评论
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:118-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.039. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
Referral patterns and outcomes of a highly specialised pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting: A retrospective cohort study.高度专业化的盆腔廓清术多学科团队会议的转诊模式和结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;46(6):1138-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.荷兰西部地区胰腺手术的质量改进通过集中化实现。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1821-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1511-4. Epub 2011 May 5.
6
[Pancreas multidisciplinary team optimizes the diagnosis and treatment of pancreas-related diseases and improves the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients].[胰腺多学科团队优化胰腺相关疾病的诊断和治疗并改善胰腺癌患者的预后]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 1;60(7):666-673. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220408-00149.
7
Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation.多中心研究:多学科团队对胰腺癌可切除性和治疗分配的评估。
Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):756-764. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11093. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
8
Invited Commentary on:The Results of Pancreatic Operations after the Implementation of Multidisciplinary Team Conference (MDT): A Quality Improvement Study.特邀评论:多学科团队会议(MDT)实施后胰腺手术的结果:一项质量改进研究
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:116-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.033. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
China special issue on gastrointestinal tumors-Improved survival after multidisciplinary team decision for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: A multicenter, noninterventional, controlled study.中国胃肠道肿瘤特刊——多学科团队决策改善晚期胃肠道癌患者生存:一项多中心、非干预性、对照研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Dec 1;153(11):1885-1893. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34543. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
10
Patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms can benefit from management of multidisciplinary team: Experience from a Chinese academic center.胰腺囊性肿瘤患者可从多学科团队管理中获益:中国学术中心的经验。
Pancreatology. 2018 Oct;18(7):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of a multidisciplinary team approach on the management of focal pancreatic lesions: a single tertiary center experience.多学科团队方法对胰腺局灶性病变管理的影响:单中心三级医院经验
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep-Oct;36(5):580-587. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0827. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Current landscape and future prospects.胰腺癌的多学科团队诊断与治疗:现状与未来展望
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 15;13:1077605. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1077605. eCollection 2023.
3
Comprehensive multimodal management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Current status and progress.
可切除边缘胰腺癌的综合多模式管理:现状与进展
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb 27;15(2):142-162. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.142.
4
The role of the multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) in the assessment of pancreatic cancer diagnosis and resectability: A tertiary referral center experience.多学科肿瘤委员会(MDTB)在胰腺癌诊断及可切除性评估中的作用:一家三级转诊中心的经验
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 17;10:1119557. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1119557. eCollection 2023.
5
Circular RNA hsa_circ_0006117 Facilitates Pancreatic Cancer Progression by Regulating the miR-96-5p/KRAS/MAPK Signaling Pathway.环状RNA hsa_circ_0006117通过调控miR-96-5p/KRAS/MAPK信号通路促进胰腺癌进展。
J Oncol. 2021 Sep 2;2021:9213205. doi: 10.1155/2021/9213205. eCollection 2021.
6
The impact of the multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) on the management of pancreatic diseases in a tertiary referral center.多学科肿瘤委员会(MDTB)对三级转诊中心胰腺疾病管理的影响。
ESMO Open. 2021 Feb;6(1):100010. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100010. Epub 2020 Dec 14.