Francisse Sophie, Gkolfakis Paraskevas, Viesca Michael Fernandez Y, Mans Laura, Demols Anne, Pezzullo Martina, Loi Patricia, Navez Julie, Closset Jean, Bali Maria Antonietta, Wettere Morgane Van, D'Haene Nicki, Demetter Pieter, Verset Laurine, Bouchart Christelle, Lemmers Arnaud, Deviere Jacques, Delhaye Myriam, Laethem Jean-Luc Van, Arvanitakis Marianna
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB (Sophie Francisse, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Michael Fernandez Y Viesca, Laura Mans, Anne Demols, Arnaud Lemmers, Jacques Deviere, Myriam Delhaye, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Marianna Arvanitakis).
Department of Radiology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB (Martina Pezzullo, Morgane Van Wettere).
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep-Oct;36(5):580-587. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0827. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings aim to optimize patient management. We evaluated the impact of MDT discussions on the management and diagnosis of focal pancreatic lesions in a single tertiary center.
All patients with an initial diagnosis of solid or cystic pancreatic lesion discussed in our institution's MDT meeting on pancreatic diseases between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were included. The impact of MDT discussion on patient management, defined as a modification of the initially proposed therapeutic plan after MDT discussion, as well as the criteria leading to this modification, were the primary outcomes. Impact on diagnosis was the secondary outcome.
A total of 522 patients were included. Of these, 185 (35.4%) and 337 (64.6%) had an initial diagnosis of cystic or solid lesion, respectively. The most common referral query was regarding the management plan (349/522; 66.9%). Endoscopy was the procedure most often proposed before MDT discussion (109/522; 20.9%). Overall, the MDT discussion led to modification of the management plan in 377/522 patients (72.2%), with a statistically significant difference between cystic and solid lesions (63.2% vs. 77.2%; P<0.001). Management modifications were mainly driven by revision of cross-sectional radiological images. MDT discussion led to modification of the diagnosis in 92/522 patients (17.6%), with a significant difference regarding cystic lesions (35.7% vs. 7.7%; P<0.001).
MDT discussion impacts the management of patients with cystic and solid pancreatic lesions, leading to a modification of the initially proposed management in two-thirds of them, mainly through revision of cross-sectional imaging.
多学科团队(MDT)会议旨在优化患者管理。我们评估了MDT讨论对单个三级中心局灶性胰腺病变管理和诊断的影响。
纳入2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日在我们机构胰腺疾病MDT会议上讨论的所有初诊为实性或囊性胰腺病变的患者。MDT讨论对患者管理的影响(定义为MDT讨论后对最初提出的治疗计划的修改)以及导致这种修改的标准是主要结局。对诊断的影响是次要结局。
共纳入522例患者。其中,185例(35.4%)和337例(64.6%)初诊分别为囊性或实性病变。最常见的转诊问题是关于管理计划(349/522;66.9%)。内镜检查是MDT讨论前最常建议的检查(109/522;20.9%)。总体而言,MDT讨论导致522例患者中的377例(72.2%)管理计划发生修改,囊性和实性病变之间存在统计学显著差异(63.2%对77.2%;P<0.001)。管理修改主要由横断面影像学图像的修订驱动。MDT讨论导致522例患者中的92例(17.6%)诊断发生修改,囊性病变存在显著差异(35.7%对7.7%;P<0.001)。
MDT讨论影响囊性和实性胰腺病变患者的管理,导致三分之二的患者最初提出的管理发生修改,主要通过横断面成像的修订。