Suppr超能文献

术前超声引导下髂筋膜阻滞与股神经阻滞用于股骨近端骨折患者脊髓麻醉定位前的比较:一项观察性研究

Comparison of preoperative ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block femoral nerve block for proximal femur fractures before positioning for spinal anesthesia: an observational study.

作者信息

Gupta Meeta, Kamath Shaila Surendra

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College of Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2020 Apr 1;33(2):138-143. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.138.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe pain associated with proximal femur fractures makes the positioning for regional anesthesia a challenge. Systemic administration of analgesics can have adverse effects. Individually, both the fascia iliaca block (FIB) and femoral nerve blocks (FNB) have been studied. However, there is little evidence comparing the two. The aim of this study was to compare the overall efficacy of the two blocks in patients with proximal femur fracture before positioning for spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective and emergency surgery with the diagnosis of proximal femur fracture between October 2018 and June 2019 were included in the study. The patients were assigned to two groups by convenience nonprobability sampling of 35 each.

RESULTS

Our study showed a reduction in visual analogue scale scores at 3, 4, and 5 minutes after administration of the FIB being 5.1 ± 1.1, 4.1 ± 1.3, and 2.8 ± 0.8, and those after the FNB as 4.4 ± 1.1, 3.3 ± 1.1, and 2.1 ± 1.4 with < 0.05, which was statistically significant. The mean first rescue analgesia time for the FIB was 7.1 ± 2.1 hours, while for the FNB it was 5.2 ± 0.7 hours. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ultrasound guided FNB and FIB techniques provide sufficient analgesia for patient's positioning before spinal anesthesia. However, the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by FIB was greater than that of the FNB.

摘要

背景

股骨近端骨折相关的剧痛使得区域麻醉的定位成为一项挑战。全身使用镇痛药可能会产生不良反应。单独来看,髂筋膜阻滞(FIB)和股神经阻滞(FNB)都已得到研究。然而,比较两者的证据很少。本研究的目的是比较这两种阻滞在股骨近端骨折患者行脊髓麻醉定位前的总体疗效。

方法

纳入2018年10月至2019年6月期间计划进行择期和急诊手术、诊断为股骨近端骨折的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I、II和III级患者。通过便利抽样将患者分为两组,每组35例。

结果

我们的研究显示,FIB给药后3、4和5分钟时视觉模拟量表评分降低,分别为5.1±1.1、4.1±1.3和2.8±0.8,FNB给药后分别为4.4±1.1、3.3±1.1和2.1±1.4,P<0.05,具有统计学意义。FIB的平均首次补救镇痛时间为7.1±2.1小时,而FNB为5.2±0.7小时。P值小于0.001,具有显著性。

结论

超声引导下的FNB和FIB技术在脊髓麻醉前为患者定位时均能提供足够的镇痛效果。然而,FIB提供的术后镇痛持续时间比FNB更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8110/7136299/32dd2fbe2fe6/KJP-33-138-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验