Suppr超能文献

包装的力量:儿童食品包装的范围综述和评估。

The Power of Packaging: A Scoping Review and Assessment of Child-Targeted Food Packaging.

机构信息

Department of Communication, Media, and Film, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Mar 30;12(4):958. doi: 10.3390/nu12040958.

Abstract

Child-targeted food marketing is a significant public health concern, prompting calls for its regulation. Product packaging is a powerful form of food marketing aimed at children, yet no published studies examine the range of literature on the topic or the "power" of its marketing techniques. This study attempts such a task. Providing a systematic scoping review of the literature on child-targeted food packaging, we assesses the nutritional profile of these foods, the types of foods examined, and the creative strategies used to attract children. Fifty-seven full text articles were reviewed. Results identify high level trends in methodological approaches (content analysis, 38%), outcomes measured (exposure, 44%) and with respect to age. Studies examining the nutritional profile of child-targeted packaged foods use various models, classifying from anywhere from 41% to 97% of products as unhealthy. Content analyses track the prevalence of child-targeted techniques (cartoon characters as the most frequently measured), while other studies assess their effectiveness. Overall, this scoping review offers important insights into the differences between techniques tracked and those measured for effectiveness in existing literature, and identifies gaps for future research around the question of persuasive power-particularly when it comes to children's age and the specific types of techniques examined.

摘要

儿童导向食品营销是一个重大的公共卫生问题,促使人们呼吁对其进行监管。产品包装是一种针对儿童的强有力的食品营销形式,但没有发表的研究探讨过该主题的文献范围或其营销手段的“威力”。本研究试图对此进行研究。通过对儿童导向食品包装文献进行系统的范围审查,我们评估了这些食品的营养状况、所检查的食品类型以及吸引儿童的创意策略。共审查了 57 篇全文文章。结果确定了方法学方法(内容分析,38%)、测量的结果(暴露,44%)以及年龄方面的高度趋势。研究儿童导向包装食品营养状况的研究使用了各种模型,将产品中不健康的产品分类从 41%到 97%不等。内容分析跟踪儿童导向技术的流行程度(卡通人物是最常测量的),而其他研究则评估其效果。总的来说,这项范围审查为现有文献中跟踪的技术与针对有效性进行测量的技术之间的差异提供了重要的见解,并确定了未来研究中关于说服力问题的空白,特别是当涉及到儿童的年龄和所检查的具体技术类型时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e04c/7230356/7fc7b264432d/nutrients-12-00958-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验