Ceccarani Camilla, Bassanini Giulia, Montanari Chiara, Casiraghi Maria Cristina, Ottaviano Emerenziana, Morace Giulia, Biasucci Giacomo, Paci Sabrina, Borghi Elisa, Verduci Elvira
Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20142, Italy.
Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, 20090 Segrate, Italy.
Metabolites. 2020 Mar 30;10(4):133. doi: 10.3390/metabo10040133.
A life-long dietary intervention can affect the substrates' availability for gut fermentation in metabolic diseases such as the glycogen-storage diseases (GSD). Besides drug consumption, the main treatment of types GSD-Ia and Ib to prevent metabolic complications is a specific diet with definite nutrient intakes. In order to evaluate how deeply this dietary treatment affects gut bacteria, we compared the gut microbiota of nine GSD-I subjects and 12 healthy controls (HC) through 16S rRNA gene sequencing; we assessed their dietary intake and nutrients, their microbial short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) via gas chromatography and their hematic values. Both alpha-diversity and phylogenetic analysis revealed a significant biodiversity reduction in the GSD group compared to the HC group, and highlighted profound differences of their gut microbiota. GSD subjects were characterized by an increase in the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae and Veillonellaceae families, while the beneficial genera Faecalibacterium and Oscillospira were significantly reduced. SCFA quantification revealed a significant increase of fecal acetate and propionate in GSD subjects, but with a beneficial role probably reduced due to unbalanced bacterial interactions; nutritional values correlated to bacterial genera were significantly different between experimental groups, with nearly opposite cohort trends.
终身饮食干预会影响糖原贮积病(GSD)等代谢疾病中肠道发酵底物的可用性。除了药物治疗外,预防代谢并发症的GSD-Ia型和Ib型的主要治疗方法是采用具有特定营养素摄入量的特殊饮食。为了评估这种饮食治疗对肠道细菌的影响程度,我们通过16S rRNA基因测序比较了9名GSD-I受试者和12名健康对照(HC)的肠道微生物群;我们评估了他们的饮食摄入和营养素、通过气相色谱法测定的微生物短链脂肪酸(SCFA)以及他们的血液值。α多样性和系统发育分析均显示,与HC组相比,GSD组的生物多样性显著降低,并突出了其肠道微生物群的深刻差异。GSD受试者的特征是肠杆菌科和韦荣球菌科的相对丰度增加,而有益菌属粪杆菌属和颤螺菌属则显著减少。SCFA定量显示,GSD受试者粪便中的乙酸盐和丙酸盐显著增加,但由于细菌相互作用失衡,其有益作用可能降低;实验组之间与细菌属相关的营养价值存在显著差异,两组趋势几乎相反。