Suppr超能文献

工作场所赞助的戒烟项目的随机对照比较。

A randomized comparison of Worksite-sponsored smoking cessation programs.

作者信息

Omenn G S, Thompson B, Sexton M, Hessol N, Breitenstein B, Curry S, Michnich M, Peterson A

机构信息

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;4(5):261-7.

PMID:3224003
Abstract

This worksite study assesses the relative effectiveness of three smoking cessation programs. Computerized medical files indicated that 29% of 13,171 employees were current smokers. Of smokers responding to a worksite-wide survey, 79% indicated interest in a smoking cessation program; 402 smokers agreed to participate and were randomly allocated, within their preference for a group or self-help approach, to the three different programs. Overall, 11% of smokers participated, an excellent rate for a large worksite. Participants were followed for 12 months (91% follow-up). Smokers in the group preference had better short-term results than did those following the self-help approach. The Multiple Component Program had 61% who quit, the Relapse Prevention Program had 37%, and the American Cancer Society Quitter's Guide had 12%. Long-term quit rates ranged from 16% to 26%; all groups exceeded the usual spontaneous quit rate of 5%.

摘要

这项工作场所研究评估了三种戒烟计划的相对有效性。计算机化医疗档案显示,在13171名员工中,29%为当前吸烟者。在参与全工作场所范围调查的吸烟者中,79%表示对戒烟计划感兴趣;402名吸烟者同意参与,并根据他们对团体或自助方式的偏好,被随机分配到三个不同的计划中。总体而言,11%的吸烟者参与了,这对一个大型工作场所来说是一个极佳的比例。对参与者进行了12个月的跟踪(随访率为91%)。选择团体方式的吸烟者比采用自助方式的吸烟者有更好的短期效果。多成分计划有61%的人戒烟,复发预防计划有37%,美国癌症协会戒烟指南有12%。长期戒烟率在16%至26%之间;所有组均超过了通常5%的自然戒烟率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验