Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 19;75(19):2403-2413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
P2Y inhibitor monotherapy with ticagrelor after a brief period of dual antiplatelet therapy can reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic harm after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of this approach among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains unknown.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin among patients with DM undergoing PCI.
This was a pre-specified analysis of the DM cohort in the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial. After 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were maintained on ticagrelor and randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The composite ischemic endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
Patients with DM comprised 37% (n = 2,620) of the randomized cohort and were characterized by more frequent comorbidities and a higher prevalence of multivessel disease. The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was 4.5% and 6.7% among patients with DM randomized to ticagrelor plus placebo versus ticagrelor plus aspirin (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.91; p = 0.012). Ticagrelor monotherapy was not associated with an increase in ischemic events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin (4.6% vs. 5.9%; hazard ratio: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 1.09; p = 0.14). In the overall trial population, there was no significant interaction between DM status and treatment group for the primary bleeding or ischemic endpoints.
Compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy in reducing the risk of clinically relevant bleeding without any increase in ischemic events was consistent among patients with or without DM undergoing PCI. (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention [TWILIGHT]; NCT02270242).
在接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)短暂时间后,使用替格瑞洛的 P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗可减少经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的出血,而不会增加缺血损伤。但这种方法在糖尿病(DM)患者中的影响尚不清楚。
本研究旨在检查接受 PCI 的 DM 患者中替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗的效果。
这是 TWILIGHT(高危患者 PCI 后替格瑞洛加阿司匹林或单用)试验中 DM 队列的预先指定分析。在替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗 3 个月后,患者继续使用替格瑞洛,并随机分为阿司匹林组或安慰剂组,持续 1 年。主要终点是出血学术研究联合会(BARC)2、3、5 级出血。复合缺血终点是全因死亡、心肌梗死或卒中。
DM 患者占随机队列的 37%(n=2620),其特征为合并症更常见,多血管疾病患病率更高。DM 患者随机分为替格瑞洛加安慰剂与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林组,BARC 2、3、5 级出血的发生率分别为 4.5%和 6.7%(风险比:0.65;95%置信区间:0.47 至 0.91;p=0.012)。与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗与缺血事件的增加无关(4.6%比 5.9%;风险比:0.77;95%置信区间:0.55 至 1.09;p=0.14)。在整个试验人群中,DM 状态和治疗组对主要出血或缺血终点均无显著交互作用。
与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗在降低 PCI 患者临床相关出血风险而不增加缺血事件方面的效果在合并或不合并 DM 的患者中一致。(替格瑞洛加阿司匹林或单用在高危患者 PCI 后[TWILIGHT];NCT02270242)。