Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4242-4250. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06828-3. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
To evaluate the usefulness of bilateral mammography in male patients with unilateral breast symptoms, including investigation of the diagnostic performance of unilateral and bilateral reviews and the average glandular dose (AGD) per exposure.
Two hundred seventy-one consecutive male patients (mean age, 57 years) with unilateral breast symptoms underwent bilateral mammography. Image interpretation was performed in two ways, first with a unilateral review of the symptomatic breast and then with a bilateral review. A modified BI-RADS scale (from 1 to 5) was used. The diagnostic performance of unilateral and bilateral reviews was compared, and contralateral breast abnormalities and the AGD per exposure were recorded. We also analyzed ultrasound (US) results and compared them with mammography.
Of 271 male patients, 29 were pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer. There was no bilateral breast cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 96.6%, 96.7%, 77.8%, 99.6%, and 96.7%, respectively, for unilateral review, and 96.6%, 95.9%, 73.7%, 99.6%, and 95.9% for bilateral review. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed excellent diagnostic performance for both methods: the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.966 for unilateral review and 0.962 for bilateral review (p = 0.415). The mean AGD per exposure was 1.10 ± 0.29 mGy for symptomatic breast and 1.04 ± 0.30 mGy for contralateral breast (p < 0.001). Diagnostic performance parameters of US were not significantly different from bilateral or unilateral review of mammography.
The diagnostic performance of unilateral mammography is comparable with bilateral mammography in male patients with unilateral breast symptoms. Unilateral mammography also has the advantage of reducing radiation exposure.
• There is limited knowledge about standardized guidelines or recommendations for imaging the male breast. • Unilateral mammography for male patients with unilateral breast symptoms showed comparable diagnostic performance with bilateral mammography. • Both unilateral and bilateral mammography showed excellent diagnostic performance in the assessment of male patients with unilateral breast symptoms.
评估单侧乳腺症状男性患者双侧乳腺钼靶摄影的应用价值,包括单侧及双侧阅片的诊断效能和平均腺体剂量(AGD)。
连续 271 例单侧乳腺症状的男性患者(平均年龄 57 岁)行双侧乳腺钼靶摄影。首先行单侧乳腺阅片,然后行双侧乳腺阅片。采用改良的 BI-RADS 分类(1~5 类)。比较单侧及双侧阅片的诊断效能,记录对侧乳腺异常和每次曝光的 AGD。同时分析超声(US)结果,并与钼靶摄影进行比较。
271 例男性患者中,29 例经病理证实为乳腺癌,均为单侧病变,无双侧乳腺癌。单侧乳腺钼靶摄影的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率分别为 96.6%、96.7%、77.8%、99.6%和 96.7%,双侧乳腺钼靶摄影分别为 96.6%、95.9%、73.7%、99.6%和 95.9%。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示两种方法的诊断效能均较好:单侧乳腺钼靶摄影的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.966,双侧乳腺钼靶摄影为 0.962(p=0.415)。单侧乳腺的 AGD 均值为 1.10±0.29 mGy,对侧乳腺为 1.04±0.30 mGy(p<0.001)。US 的诊断效能参数与双侧或单侧乳腺钼靶摄影比较,差异均无统计学意义。
单侧乳腺钼靶摄影在单侧乳腺症状男性患者中的诊断效能与双侧乳腺钼靶摄影相当,且具有降低辐射暴露的优势。
① 目前对于男性乳腺影像学检查尚缺乏标准化指南或推荐意见。② 单侧乳腺钼靶摄影用于单侧乳腺症状男性患者,其诊断效能与双侧乳腺钼靶摄影相当。③ 单侧及双侧乳腺钼靶摄影在评估单侧乳腺症状男性患者时均具有较好的诊断效能。