• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常技术使用问卷短版(S-ETUQ)的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the short version of the everyday technology use questionnaire (S-ETUQ).

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Nov;27(8):567-576. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1744715. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1080/11038128.2020.1744715
PMID:32242449
Abstract

Everyday technologies (ET) such as smart phones, and internet banking are increasingly incorporated into daily activities. Therefore, valid assessments are needed to identify ability in ET use and to design and evaluate interventions. To evaluate and compare the stability over time (test-retest reliability) of measures generated with the short version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (S-ETUQ) in older adults with cognitive impairment or mild dementia. Data was collected with S-ETUQ at two occasions ( = 20.9 days in between) in a sample of ( = 73) older adults with cognitive impairment of different origin ( = 38) or mild dementia ( = 35). Stability of each participant's S-ETUQ measure was examined using standardised difference -comparisons. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the S-ETUQ measures was determined by Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney u-tests. The S-ETUQ measures were statistically stable between the two occasions. Hence, the group of persons with cognitive impairment demonstrated slightly higher stability and fewer differences compared to the group with mild dementia. The ICCs (0.82-0.90) indicated good to excellent agreement. S- ETUQ can be used with older people with cognitive impairments of varying degree to gather reliable and precise information regarding their use of ET.

摘要

日常技术(ET),如智能手机和网上银行,正越来越多地融入到日常生活中。因此,需要进行有效的评估,以确定其在日常技术使用方面的能力,并设计和评估干预措施。评估和比较有认知障碍或轻度痴呆的老年人使用简短版日常技术使用问卷(S-ETUQ)生成的测量值随时间的稳定性(测试-重测可靠性)。在认知障碍不同来源的( = 38)或轻度痴呆( = 35)的老年人样本中,使用 S-ETUQ 在两个时间点(两次测试之间的时间间隔为 = 20.9 天)收集数据。使用标准化差异比较来检查每位参与者的 S-ETUQ 测量值的稳定性。S-ETUQ 测量值的重测可靠性系数由组内相关系数确定。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行比较。S-ETUQ 测量值在两次测试之间具有统计学上的稳定性。因此,与轻度痴呆组相比,认知障碍组的稳定性略高,差异也较少。ICC(0.82-0.90)表明具有良好到极好的一致性。S-ETUQ 可用于不同程度认知障碍的老年人,以收集有关其日常技术使用的可靠和精确信息。

相似文献

1
Test-retest reliability of the short version of the everyday technology use questionnaire (S-ETUQ).日常技术使用问卷短版(S-ETUQ)的重测信度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Nov;27(8):567-576. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1744715. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
The perceived challenge of everyday technologies in Sweden, the United States and England: Exploring differential item functioning in the everyday technology use questionnaire.瑞典、美国和英国对日常技术的感知挑战:探索日常技术使用问卷中的差异项目功能。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Nov;27(8):554-566. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1723685. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairment.认知障碍人士、脊髓损伤人士和认知正常的老年人在日常技术使用方面的差异。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jul;29(7):1193-1200. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000643. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire.丹麦版日常技术使用问卷的评分者间信度和重测信度
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Apr;26(3):226-234. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Importance of a functional measure in the evaluation of patients in a memory clinic: Validation of the Serbian version of the Amsterdam instrumental activities of daily living questionnaire.功能测量在记忆门诊患者评估中的重要性:塞尔维亚语版阿姆斯特丹日常生活工具性问卷的验证
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;214:107165. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107165. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer's disease? - a pilot study.日常技术使用问卷能否预测轻度认知障碍或轻度阿尔茨海默病老年患者的整体功能水平?——一项试点研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Mar;31(1):201-209. doi: 10.1111/scs.12330. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
Detection of activity limitations in older adults with MCI or Alzheimer's disease through evaluation of perceived difficulty in use of everyday technology: a replication study.通过评估老年人使用日常技术时的感知困难来检测 MCI 或阿尔茨海默病患者的活动受限:一项复制研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(3):361-71. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.605055. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
8
Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: a Rasch analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ).智力残疾者的技术与日常功能:日常技术使用问卷(ETUQ)的 Rasch 分析。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Jun;55(6):610-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01419.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
9
Assessing Everyday Activities Across the Dementia Spectrum with the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire.使用阿姆斯特丹日常生活活动问卷评估痴呆症谱中的日常活动。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(13):1261-1266. doi: 10.2174/1567205015666180925113411.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living questionnaire short version German for Switzerland.跨文化调适与验证:瑞士德语版阿姆斯特丹日常生活活动工具简表。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 2;18(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01576-w.